Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 2:36 pm
At least the good scum has a fedora.
my town reads on them are independent of their votes on meIn post 102, CheekyTeeky wrote:Karnage why are you townreading the two people voting you? It reads like you're placating them after a pretty average entrance >.>
EBWOPIn post 103, Karnage wrote:my townIn post 102, CheekyTeeky wrote:Karnage why are you townreading the two people voting you? It reads like you're placating them after a pretty average entrance >.>leanson them are independent of their votes on me
If anyone knows LR.In post 107, Plotinus wrote:LunarRest1 has been prodded and has (expired on 2020-03-02 03:13:00) to post before I start looking for a replacement because the timer runs slower on weekends.
Titus wrote: Theory, Karnage Cheeky scumteam
TrueSoulEnergy wrote: I don’t think Cheeky is but I do think Karnage could be.
I think that's all. Also, I don't like how Karnage called out TSE in 98 for not providing reasoning behind his theory, but later he posts his townleans without us knowing why he feels this way about the particular people he's leaning town on.Karnage wrote:I'm leaning town on Titus and TSE atm
I really like these two posts from Titus. They show a strong town mindset imo. Granted they could be faked which is why I only lean town for now.In post 110, Ph0enix wrote:Can the people who have provided reads/theories for scumteams and haven't explained the reasoning behind them do so :/I think that's all. Also, I don't like how Karnage called out TSE in 98 for not providing reasoning behind his theory, but later he posts his townleans without us knowing why he feels this way about the particular people he's leaning town on.Karnage wrote:I'm leaning town on Titus and TSE atm
Oh yes, my bad. There is a difference, yes, but given that we are currently still early in the game and are working with very limited information, I still believe that providing reasoning behind a townlean could be helpful. Perhaps there's something we've overlooked about this particular player that you have now shed light on, which itself may help us determine his/her alignment.In post 112, Karnage wrote: Re: 98 - that was "calling out" Titus, not TSE. I dont think saying I called them out is a fair description though. It was meant to be kinda snarky to just point out that without reasoning I don't think the vote should be taken too seriously. Also, I think there's a difference between voting somebody without saying why and having a town lean on somebody without saying why.
My apologies.In post 109, Plotinus wrote:You are only allowed to communicate with each other about this game in the topics I've created. When you get a PM on MafiaScum, it sends you an email, so we will wait for LunarRest to check their email.
@TSEIn post 110, Ph0enix wrote:Can the people who have provided reads/theories for scumteams and haven't explained the reasoning behind them do so :/TrueSoulEnergy wrote: I don’t think Cheeky is but I do think Karnage could be.
Your posts you made as a greater possibility of it being done by scum then that of Cheeky’s posts.In post 116, Karnage wrote:@TSEIn post 110, Ph0enix wrote:Can the people who have provided reads/theories for scumteams and haven't explained the reasoning behind them do so :/TrueSoulEnergy wrote: I don’t think Cheeky is but I do think Karnage could be.
I’m curious about the Titus/KarnageIn post 118, QuantumQuasar wrote:Phi posted only once? Two goons versus PR/goon, one silent one talkative
Considering Phi Kappa silent pull info from
tapioca easy pull
karnage close enough to be sideways
lunar both silen
phoenix precise nervous
tse present similar opposite enough to be forgotten
titus blase but could be hiding more
cheeky further aloof
cheeky tapioca
cheeky karnage
cheeky lunar
cheeky phoenix
cheeky tse
cheeky titus
cheeky phi
titus lunar
titus phi ok combo
titus cheeky soso
titus karnage fed
titus phoenix lasso
lunar karnage / karnage lunar commodores
phoenix tapioca
titus tapioca karnage titus
Guys, am I dumb, is QQ using some terminology I'm not familiar with, I don't understand half of this post.In post 118, QuantumQuasar wrote:Phi posted only once? Two goons versus PR/goon, one silent one talkative
Considering Phi Kappa silent pull info from
tapioca easy pull
karnage close enough to be sideways
lunar both silen
phoenix precise nervous
tse present similar opposite enough to be forgotten
titus blase but could be hiding more
cheeky further aloof
cheeky tapioca
cheeky karnage
cheeky lunar
cheeky phoenix
cheeky tse
cheeky titus
cheeky phi
titus lunar
titus phi ok combo
titus cheeky soso
titus karnage fed
titus phoenix lasso
lunar karnage / karnage lunar commodores
phoenix tapioca
titus tapioca karnage titus
He’s just giving buddy reads.In post 121, Titus wrote:TSE, I guess you're on translation duty.
Phoenix, I'll try to explain my theory tonight. It makes sense in my head as an aha type moment but I'm not the clearest.