"Morning everyone! I hope you enjoyes tour stay last night. Why is there red paint splattered on my walls?"
Malakittens (3):
farside22, notscience, Dunnstral
HK 50 (2):
votato, bob3141
notscience (1):
geraintm
Not_Mafia (1):
Ghost Ganster
Ghost Ganster (1):
Not_Mafia
farside22 (1):
Green Crayons
Dunnstral (1):
DoctorPepper
Not voting (3):
Battle Mage, HK 50, Malakittens
Mod Notes:
Majority is 7 players.
Day 1 has begun and will end in (expired on 2020-06-22 07:23:04).
Battle Mage is V/LA until Sunday.[/area]
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:50 pm
by farside22
See the thing that I found odd is 2 things
1) In regards to mala is that she said she thought them scum together and wanted to keep that on the back burner even when it was just a reference to a video game. So that just made no sense this early in the game.
2) was this post from GC:
In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:also obviously mala's suspicion of votato is bad, and her back-burner nonsense is silly, but lol nonetheless at farside and notscience
Which to me reads that, well he agrees that everything mala said looks bad or silly but it's scummy to point that out. Then he says this:
I’m a manager- new company I joined a month ago and I’ve never opened a location before
That's cool. Man the guide lines and the social standards are going to be a pain in the ass for a few months. I haven't even been called to come back to work and my place has been open a month now. They had some people come back so far, but not all.
That she has a bad reason for suspecting votato/HK can go either way in terms of Mala’s alignment.
The fact that her suspicion is bad is because she isn’t familiar with SW video games means her bad suspicion isn’t alignment indicative.
You “expecting more” of Malta here means you “expected Mala to get the SW reference so she wouldn’t have had the bad suspicion.”
Unless if you think she’s lying about missing the SW reference.
I think she said she sees it was in regards to a video game but still finds them suspect as possible team is more then a bit ridiculous
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 9:03 am
by Malakittens
Alright guys I admit I missed the Star Wars reference and i took it a bit too serious. I am admitting that. So can we move on?
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 9:47 am
by bob3141
Green I don't quite get where you Vote on farside is coming from. Is it a RVS vote or do you have some sort of scum lean towards him so far. As you don't seem to have actually called him scum once, at all. Even though you have critiqued a few of his posts while having your vote on his slot.
Take teh post that state your opinion on farside suspecting mala over the hk related events. But do you actually suspect him based on this to be scum. You seem to be more finding the very notion of players suspecting mala over this to be humorous.
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2020 10:08 am
by bob3141
In post 101, farside22 wrote:See the thing that I found odd is 2 things
1) In regards to mala is that she said she thought them scum together and wanted to keep that on the back burner even when it was just a reference to a video game. So that just made no sense this early in the game.
2) was this post from GC:
In post 68, Green Crayons wrote:also obviously mala's suspicion of votato is bad, and her back-burner nonsense is silly, but lol nonetheless at farside and notscience
Which to me reads that, well he agrees that everything mala said looks bad or silly but it's scummy to point that out. Then he says this:
But. Like. Anyone who has played videogames and likes Star Wars knows the reference. There's nothing to back burner.
Again that was in my post that he disagreed with. So none of his disagreement match with what he is saying after.
VOTE: Green Crayon
Also funny enough I now have a scum ping on Dunn
So how strong was your read on mala at that point. As it feels more to me like someone poking a small bump in the lawn. Than a suspected ants nest. ( i know i'm bad at analogies )
You say certainly scum read her to some degree but if mala is scum then why are your voting for green now?
As you haven't said you no longer suspect mala. But if you still think mala could be scum even if it is weak reads so far. Then what do you think greens motive would be.
As rather i get teh impression from greens actions that if he is scum. Then it feels more like him trying to white knight a fellow townie rather than instead trying to deflect us from suspecting mala.
In post 109, Malakittens wrote:You know I’m glad I played a game with you before because that comment is just eh.
Yeah, I'm glad there are a few people here I've played with so my day1ness wont be too much of a problem
The last game was fun and so tiring at the same time. Although i did get some fun out of punishing scum for no killing twice. Ild find it hilarious if it turns out mala has infact rolled scum again after repping into that game.
)