Mafiascum.net

I don't think I've ever seen CJ engage with a game.

In post 100, Tuxedo Mask wrote:I don't think I've ever seen CJ engage with a game.

My first game with him, he was lurky until he cc'd my fakeclaim, at which point he was fairly engaged. The second game I was in with him, I was partnered with him and he was purposely not engaging too much because he knew his town meta was pretty inactive. That said, he at least did more than a naked vote in his first post in both games, so I would have liked to have seen more from him here.

oh, the wildcard and the jester showed up
I dnt think neither BM nor CJ have too many alignment indicative things this early by style alone

unlike deimos, I dnt blv even distribution is good for psychological reasons, and I dnt think there is a correltation btw voting for oneself and resistance to outside pressure
I do think it is easier to wagon and it is harder to lynch the first wagons tho

tuxedo/drew is a good guess at this point for page 5

there is no such a thing as good guess on page 5 tho

In post 96, Deimos27 wrote:I would like pressure on pi for similar reasons.

I like this one in particular, Im confident it is easier to catch pi the earlier we get a gameview from him from past experiences

I inherently dislike deimos style cause I feel it is rly easy to disguise over logic and optimal game style, unfortunaly that is not relevant in an alignment way, so Im forced to initially reject a sdcum hypothesis until further notice; for now, I think he lays down a good foundation (or act like he is doing as scum, wich still is good advice one way or the other)

VOTE: Midari Ikishima
I want to see u break
U should rly begin worrying and stop voting urself and those kind of nonsenses
That should be L-2 if Im not mistaken

In post 103, word321 wrote:unlike deimos, I dnt blv even distribution is good for psychological reasons, and I dnt think there is a correltation btw voting for oneself and resistance to outside pressure
I do think it is easier to wagon and it is harder to lynch the first wagons tho

Be prepared for lots of similar posting from Deimos. Just finished a game with them, very good player, but their posts are full of analytical data. I felt like I was reading a science journal at points.

In post 104, word321 wrote:tuxedo/drew is a good guess at this point for page 5

Ya, we have done a bad job at hiding our buddying. How about you give us another shot?

Also, town points for announcing the L-2. I have seen wagons fairly quickly formed early in the game where people don't do this and then a lol hammer happens. Though if Midari is in fact scum than there may be an associative tell there, but I don't want to put the carriage before the horse.

In post 95, brassherald wrote:So, by being a trendsetter, I am cool. Thus it is proven.

In post 63, Deimos27 wrote:ceejay do you have meta with Battle Mage?

Uh nope

In post 104, word321 wrote:tuxedo/drew is a good guess at this point for page 5

Why drew specifically? I've got him as a slight TL. Tuxedo might be scum though.

Doctor Drew wrote:Also, town points for announcing the L-2. I have seen wagons fairly quickly formed early in the game where people don't do this and then a lol hammer happens. Though if Midari is in fact scum than there may be an associative tell there, but I don't want to put the carriage before the horse.

Honestly, I think it would be embarrassing if she gets lolhammered after self-voting.

In post 75, votato wrote:im not saying the self-vote was 100% a scumslip, but its something to be looking at going forward.

You mean to say that it's scum indicative

In post 82, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 80, Deimos27 wrote:From what I've seen of you Battle Mage, it's completely within your meta to play suicidally in RVS, and I don't really know what I gain from voting you for that.

Gah! I've been outted! It's not suicidal though, I have legit reasons...but nobody cares.

I might care. Want to talk about those legit reasons?

In post 83, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 79, votato wrote:

In post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...

i think we know better than to pay attention to anything you do

It took you this long to shade me for no reason? You must be scum here! VOTE: votato

Weird post RVS post though...

In post 115, ceejayvinoya wrote:

In post 83, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 79, votato wrote:

In post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...

i think we know better than to pay attention to anything you do

It took you this long to shade me for no reason? You must be scum here! VOTE: votato

Weird post RVS post though...

BM is......weird in general.

Hmm I'll keep that in mind

yep, just ignore BM and you'll be fine. i think VCA and later days should be a good way to sort BM. or a PL.

@votato you should put your vote somewhere.

Also I just noticed that Worcestershire hasn't posted yet.

VOTE: superbowl y u lurk?

In post 119, Marashu wrote:@votato you should put your vote somewhere.

Also I just noticed that Worcestershire hasn't posted yet.

In post 120, votato wrote:VOTE: superbowl y u lurk?

Forced vote?

Also, totally forgot Super is in this game.

eh its page 5 i dont feel obligated to vote. it was a compromise. it wasnt really rvs, but its page 5 so if superbowl shows up and says good things then my vote moves.

In post 99, Deimos27 wrote:Voting ceejay is cool.
Last time I played with him he was scum and I put him last on my PoE. Massive L.

except that was not the only time u played with cj; on Newbie 1998 u also played with cj, he opened the game with a oneliner vote and u opened the game late commenting about every player except cj, wich was town on that ocasion, so Im inclined to blv u r indeed aquatained enough with his playstyle to know his attitude is not alignment indicative nor will u get anything more for voting this early that guy. It is also a fact that effectiveness and optimality of a player r most of the time not related to his alignment too, so that is hardly an argument to heighten the scummness of a raw vote. So where does ur fixation for cj come from, rly?

In post 77, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 76, Midari Ikishima wrote:So you are saying my self vote was a scum slip?

Or could be something to note later in the game when I don't find it for anything else but humour. Due to it was posted with a gif of me with a gun to my head.

I think you are reaching a bit there. I mean I thought we were still in RVS. I have you in my town pile for now but it feels a bit reaching.

Votato's "scumslip" is a reach and a half but this reaction reads like you are very anxious to defend yourself

In post 79, votato wrote:

In post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...

i think we know better than to pay attention to anything you do

These two posts were about an hour apart, from earlier today.

Seems weird that to call someone out for lurking this early, and out of all the people to vote.....vote the person kinda backed you.......who posted more or less right before you.

Back to back scum games my dude?

VOTE: votato