Page 5 of 105

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:54 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 96, maxwell wrote:bland setup spec that doesn't even come to a meaningful conclusion, pure empty content. Subsequent posts have not been better.
I am willing to follow your line of reasoning for now.
Execute: Titus

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:55 am
by maxwell
username is still probably town because scum probably doesn't go out of their way to suggest an antitown strategy like that and I buy that they sincerely thought it was a good idea.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:55 am
by Alisae
In post 98, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 95, Alisae wrote:Village should always be thinking about who the PA is and use their brains about it methinks.
Who is this "village" you refer to? I'd like you to know that i am under the command of the East India Company in bringing copper to the boonies and i'd like it if you showed some respect to our company's authority by referring to me and all of us as sophisticated merchants.
Well Norwee, you see.

I’m specifically referring to the townies who decided to install Raid Shadow Legends and play through the tutorial.
Did you know that if you installed Raid Shadow Legends and played through the tutorial, you’ll get
- more rands of your preferred alignment
- better teammates
- more rands of your favorite role
- and lastly, less toxic games
(results may vary)

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:55 am
by Titus
In post 97, username wrote:
In post 0, FakeGod wrote:If at end of Day 5, there are at least 2 Smugglers alive, then Smugglers win.

Disregard my last post, I'm illiterate
Unvote:username

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:57 am
by username
In post 99, Titus wrote:
In post 91, username wrote:Okay so this is a fakegod setup which means there's slim to no chance of finding a breaking strategy


I'm usually the first to object to denying tribute to the blood gods on day one but what if we no-execute and send out shipments / shipment check And work off that on day 2?

Reduces our risk of outting / killing the tomboy on day one. There's no night kill, and then we have a jumping off point tomorrow.
We have a jumping off point now. Unilaterally forgoing a lynch is bad.

Execute: username

Yah titus no fucking shit that's why I literally said I went back and read the rules again and realized it was stupid

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:58 am
by NorwegianboyEE
These spambots are getting quite advanced.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:59 am
by Moment
In post 56, Datisi wrote:
In post 47, Moment wrote:VOTE: Norwegianboy
[snip]
Early scumlean on Titus.
:?:
I assumed the read on Norwegian was implicit with the vote.

--
In post 58, Menalque wrote:Fun fact: I am scumreading exactly one (1) person who has posted so far
I'm pretty sure that literally every single time I've seen this in a game I'm in, it's been in reference to me. Am I correct?

--
In post 89, Titus wrote:
In post 83, maxwell wrote:
In post 74, Hel wrote:That's a good point from Titus. Do we check the scummiest 2 people then and try and hit scum?
No, the strategy is we vote Titus today.
Why? I don't recall ever playing with you, so this "strategy" vote/tunnel feels weird and out of place.
Why would the vote make more sense if maxwell was someone who was familiar with you and vice versa?

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:01 am
by Alisae
In post 105, NorwegianboyEE wrote:These spambots are getting quite advanced.
also, another thing you can do is you can go to my twitch channel, and you can "test" to see if your prime is working by clicking the subscribe button and then giving me your prime.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:02 am
by Moment
In post 96, maxwell wrote:bland setup spec that doesn't even come to a meaningful conclusion, pure empty content. Subsequent posts have not been better.
This is basically the same thing that was thinking with regards to Titus' posts. I think this reflects more on maxwell being town than any sort of statement about Titus, however.

--
In post 99, Titus wrote:
In post 91, username wrote:Okay so this is a fakegod setup which means there's slim to no chance of finding a breaking strategy


I'm usually the first to object to denying tribute to the blood gods on day one but what if we no-execute and send out shipments / shipment check And work off that on day 2?

Reduces our risk of outting / killing the tomboy on day one. There's no night kill, and then we have a jumping off point tomorrow.
We have a jumping off point now. Unilaterally forgoing a lynch is bad.

Execute: username
Deliberately suggesting a strategy that's bad for town—the flaws of which are so immediately apparent as to be pointed out within the next three minutes—is not a real scum strategy. This is a bad vote.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:02 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I suggest we kick Hel off the Wheat trade and investigate that ship.
investigate Wheat

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:03 am
by Alisae
In post 109, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I suggest we kick Hel off the Wheat trade and investigate that ship.
investigate Wheat
why?

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:03 am
by Moment
I think I take back my Titus scumread. Despite her vote being bad, I don't think it actually comes from scum – especially her subsequent unvote.

I actually feel quite happy with my initial vote.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:06 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 110, Alisae wrote:
In post 109, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I suggest we kick Hel off the Wheat trade and investigate that ship.
investigate Wheat
why?
I didn't like Moment at first. But the fact that they said they were "happy with their vote" makes me think they're town again.
Datisi is good to keep unchecked for WIFOM maybe. Didn't realize they were on the ship. They should be switched out with someone else.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:06 am
by Moment
I don't feel that I could explain myself particularly well at the current moment and thus I won't attempt to. That being said, if I had to give an example, I think this post is fairly scum-indicative.
In post 100, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 96, maxwell wrote:bland setup spec that doesn't even come to a meaningful conclusion, pure empty content. Subsequent posts have not been better.
I am willing to follow your line of reasoning for now.
Execute: Titus

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:07 am
by NorwegianboyEE
That's one of my least scummy posts. :(

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:08 am
by Titus
In post 106, Moment wrote:Why would the vote make more sense if maxwell was someone who was familiar with you and vice versa?
Early voters on me are usually pressure voters, not tunnelers/serious. I'm not a lead taker day 1. Pressuring me though is an excellent way to get me going and sorting the slots around me.

I am half wondering whether he was told I was weak day 1 and a safe place to push to eliminate me before I hit the point where I take off.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:08 am
by Hel
I buy username's townslip of not knowing scum's alternate wincon. He's giving me good Port Authority vibes too so he can be my shipmaster.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:08 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 113, Moment wrote:I don't feel that I could explain myself particularly well at the current moment and thus I won't attempt to.
Why did you vote me initially though? What was your thoughts in your first post?

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:08 am
by Hel
In post 109, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I suggest we kick Hel off the Wheat trade and investigate that ship.
investigate Wheat
Over my dead body. I'm never parting with my beloved Wheat.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:09 am
by Maki Harukawa
Image
Townreading on Alisae/Titus/Username so far. Can't say anyone has pinged my radar yet.

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:09 am
by Menalque
If anyone would like to know if I am scumreading them, I would request that they ask in the form of the question: “is it me, Jesus?” while quoting the post where I said I was scumreading exactly one (1) person

That number may now be a soft two (2)

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:11 am
by Datisi
In post 106, Moment wrote:
In post 56, Datisi wrote:
In post 47, Moment wrote:VOTE: Norwegianboy
[snip]
Early scumlean on Titus.
:?:
I assumed the read on Norwegian was implicit with the vote.
in retrospect it should have been

i was gonna ask you about it, but considering

~
In post 112, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I didn't like Moment at first. But the fact that they said they were "happy with their vote" makes me think they're town again.
do you like when people scumread you or?

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:12 am
by Hel
Image

Getting some good reads here. I'm compiling my thoughts into a powerpoint presentation. Can I attach that here?

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:13 am
by Titus
In post 120, Menalque wrote:If anyone would like to know if I am scumreading them, I would request that they ask in the form of the question: “is it me, Jesus?” while quoting the post where I said I was scumreading exactly one (1) person

That number may now be a soft two (2)
Let's pretend I understand this here.

Where's the newbie queue Melanque? He's more readable. Did I spell it right?

Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:14 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 121, Datisi wrote:do you like when people scumread you or?
Unknown people that scumread me hard based on my first couple posts have usually been town so i just treat it that way.