Mafiascum.net

In post 96, geraintm wrote:

In post 46, RCEnigma wrote:By the end of page 3 I will have caught 1 scum.

Proceed.

Nope. By the end of day 1 no one will have caught scum. Never happened before, it isnt going to change here

Out of the six games I've played on the site, we've eliminated scum on day one twice. What are you talking about?

In post 96, geraintm wrote:

In post 46, RCEnigma wrote:By the end of page 3 I will have caught 1 scum.

Proceed.

Nope. By the end of day 1 no one will have caught scum. Never happened before, it isnt going to change here

We just played together in a game where I caught scum day 1

In post 89, ItalianoVD wrote:I’m out for tonight though. Will catch up and see what happening tomorrow.

^ Continued to visit the site on and off for two hours after I accused them of being scum. Didn't post anything in a public channel though.

Only on mafiascum would my obviously cyber-stalking someone be anything but a sign of a malcontent mindset.

After reading through up to page 4 again, what it looks like to me is we were out of RVS once callforjudgment made his serious vote. @ callforjudgment I know you said that we left RVS before you made your post/vote, but I didn’t find that. Can you point to where you saw it move out of RVS?

@SJReaver: Listen I’m not gonna waste time trying to prove to you that I’m town, but can you honestly say that all of your posts have added to the gamestate and have helped in finding scum?

If you’re town your tunneling doesn’t help, but if you’re scum, you picked the wrong person to target.

VOTE: Banana

Gotta say something better than bruh my dude. Even though we’ve all been “fluffing” it overall your posts have felt very apathetic.

Scum should kill Italiano

NM might be town lol.

In post 96, geraintm wrote:

In post 46, RCEnigma wrote:By the end of page 3 I will have caught 1 scum.

Proceed.

Nope. By the end of day 1 no one will have caught scum. Never happened before, it isnt going to change here

In my experience, if scum is caught day 1 it's pretty much due to luck lol

In post 102, SJReaver wrote:

In post 89, ItalianoVD wrote:I’m out for tonight though. Will catch up and see what happening tomorrow.

^ Continued to visit the site on and off for two hours after I accused them of being scum. Didn't post anything in a public channel though.

In post 104, ItalianoVD wrote:After reading through up to page 4 again, what it looks like to me is we were out of RVS once callforjudgment made his serious vote. @ callforjudgment I know you said that we left RVS before you made your post/vote, but I didn’t find that. Can you point to where you saw it move out of RVS?

@SJReaver: Listen I’m not gonna waste time trying to prove to you that I’m town, but can you honestly say that all of your posts have added to the gamestate and have helped in finding scum?

If you’re town your tunneling doesn’t help, but if you’re scum, you picked the wrong person to target.

VOTE: Banana

Gotta say something better than bruh my dude. Even though we’ve all been “fluffing” it overall your posts have felt very apathetic.

Bruh

In post 104, ItalianoVD wrote: @SJReaver: Listen I’m not gonna waste time trying to prove to you that I’m town, but can you honestly say that all of your posts have added to the gamestate and have helped in finding scum?

No, but I am not you.

That's the thing. Instead of being a 'good townie' you should have been a 'good ItailianVD.'

Literally everyone read you as town at the end of day 1. Your play was perfect. And now it's ass.

The sad thing is that you'd going to persist with this because (ego, ego, ego) a more experience scum would understand how he'd blundered and try to cut his losses, but instead you'd going to give townies more time to think about things and figure out who your buddies are.

When the game finishes, I will tell you what my biggest hint that you drew a red PM was. You might not believe it, but as a fellow newbie, I want to help you get better, even if we are on different teams.

((And yes, my posts are largely fluff. That's always been the case. That's the thing you don't get: it's not about playing optimally. Townies NEVER play an optimal game. But you're a complete 180 from town!ItalianVD.))

But we can chat about this after the game ends.

Who are your scum buddies?

Sorry, sorry, you're still pretending to be town.

Who are your strong "town reads?"

Who are your "scum leanings?"

Who are your "null slots?"

^hint, I expect you to place your fellow scum in null

In post 105, Not_Mafia wrote:Scum should kill Italiano

Then I would stop tunneling them.

Do scum want to accuse me of being mafia?

Come at me, bros. You can miseliminate me but I will make you look like pigslop in the process.

Come on, mafia.

I'm vanilla townie. I don't care if you night kill me or not. Hang me on D1. You know people are going to look at the VC.

Try to miseliminate me. Come on, grow a pair and vote against SJR. Help save Italian VD.

Are you too scared?

I'm just a stupid newbie. If you miseliminate me and I flip green, you can just be like "that bitch was crazy, even if she's out of the game, at least she's not in elo."

Okay, I'll help you out: I am scum.

10000% scum.

Now you can vote against me and no one will hold it against you. Any townie would vote against someone claiming to be scum, right?

lol SJ, you are definitely my type of people

In post 81, callforjudgement wrote:

In post 77, SJReaver wrote:

In post 75, Raya36 wrote:More from me tomorrow

What happens when someone fluffposts a lot is that the thread ends up expanding quickly and making the useful content harder to find; then people end up dreading having to catch up (and get frustrated at the "thread has been bumped" indicators), stop reading for a while, their eyes glaze over and they stop scumhunting. Then scum win. Reducing the number of posts like that (even if you simply just combine them) makes it easier for players to get into the game, and makes people generally easier to read.

Oh I can definitely agree to that. Too much volume makes it harder for me to catch-up and easier for smart scum to hide between the lines.

I'm with it VOTE: SJReaper

In post 98, RCEnigma wrote:What if I told you I've already caught 2?

If you have caught scum, you may as well tell the rest of us, together with sufficient reasoning to convince us, so that we can vote them out.

In post 99, RCEnigma wrote:COJ why does your sjr read end at 22 and not say... 27 where Sjr had already done exactly what you're scumreading me for?

Because that sort of post is more scummy from someone who has a lower post count. It doesn't matter much if one individual post is being guarded/defensive if the rest of the ISO is giving away information. It does matter if the majority of a player's posts are being cagey and the rest of the ISO isn't there.

In post 104, ItalianoVD wrote:After reading through up to page 4 again, what it looks like to me is we were out of RVS once callforjudgment made his serious vote. @ callforjudgment I know you said that we left RVS before you made your post/vote, but I didn’t find that. Can you point to where you saw it move out of RVS?

The game isn't in the random voting stage as soon as there's something non-random to vote about. #31 appears to be the first post which contains a non-random (if weak) read, so it ended there.


VOTE: BananaCucho
This is a stronger read than the read I had on RCEnigma. #107 and #109 (I haven't checked #108 because I have images turned off) are the sort of content that's a) easy to post as either alignment, and b) doesn't help solve the game at all as town. This wouldn't be particularly scummy if it were posted together with more townish posts, but in isolation, it's pretty suspicious.

@SJReaver (#110): Why are you talking about day 1 in the past tense? Are you talking about a different game?

(Also, I have a mild scum read on SJReaver from #115; people are way more likely to joke about being scum when they actually are scum.)

Side note: I have limited access on Mondays and Thursdays, so I probably won't be able to post here for a few hours.

In post 118, RCEnigma wrote:I'm with it VOTE: SJReaper

Could you point out what you view as scummy exactly from SJ?

In post 113, SJReaver wrote:Come on, mafia.

I'm vanilla townie. I don't care if you night kill me or not. Hang me on D1. You know people are going to look at the VC.

Try to miseliminate me. Come on, grow a pair and vote against SJR. Help save Italian VD.

Really Sj, Saying you are vanilla townie does not help.
Only helps scum narrow down prs.

In post 119, callforjudgement wrote:

In post 98, RCEnigma wrote:What if I told you I've already caught 2?

If you have caught scum, you may as well tell the rest of us, together with sufficient reasoning to convince us, so that we can vote them out.

In post 99, RCEnigma wrote:COJ why does your sjr read end at 22 and not say... 27 where Sjr had already done exactly what you're scumreading me for?

Because that sort of post is more scummy from someone who has a lower post count. It doesn't matter much if one individual post is being guarded/defensive if the rest of the ISO is giving away information. It does matter if the majority of a player's posts are being cagey and the rest of the ISO isn't there.

In post 104, ItalianoVD wrote:After reading through up to page 4 again, what it looks like to me is we were out of RVS once callforjudgment made his serious vote. @ callforjudgment I know you said that we left RVS before you made your post/vote, but I didn’t find that. Can you point to where you saw it move out of RVS?

The game isn't in the random voting stage as soon as there's something non-random to vote about. #31 appears to be the first post which contains a non-random (if weak) read, so it ended there.


VOTE: BananaCucho
This is a stronger read than the read I had on RCEnigma. #107 and #109 (I haven't checked #108 because I have images turned off) are the sort of content that's a) easy to post as either alignment, and b) doesn't help solve the game at all as town. This wouldn't be particularly scummy if it were posted together with more townish posts, but in isolation, it's pretty suspicious.

@SJReaver (#110): Why are you talking about day 1 in the past tense? Are you talking about a different game?

(Also, I have a mild scum read on SJReaver from #115; people are way more likely to joke about being scum when they actually are scum.)

Side note: I have limited access on Mondays and Thursdays, so I probably won't be able to post here for a few hours.

You write essays

I shitpost

We can understand each other, or be at odds with one another. Up to you

In post 120, BananaCucho wrote:

In post 118, RCEnigma wrote:I'm with it VOTE: SJReaper

Could you point out what you view as scummy exactly from SJ?

In post 115, SJReaver wrote:Okay, I'll help you out: I am scum.

10000% scum.

In post 121, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

In post 113, SJReaver wrote:Come on, mafia.

I'm vanilla townie. I don't care if you night kill me or not. Hang me on D1. You know people are going to look at the VC.

Try to miseliminate me. Come on, grow a pair and vote against SJR. Help save Italian VD.

Really Sj, Saying you are vanilla townie does not help.
Only helps scum narrow down prs.

Do you scum read this move? An early VT claim like this is pretty much what townies do, even though it's anti-town in nature