Mafiascum.net

who cares about people's posting styles. it's not scum indicative. if you think his posts are scummy you can point out or ask him questions about his thought process

but you asking others about his 'posting style being weird' is weird af

it's like you are implying that he's posting weird as town?

he's scum for posting weird? or do you really think someone who has an account made in 2013 will 'post weirdly' only as scum and never as town?

i can go with akarin/gypyx/mastina very not likely to w/w

None of the above, nic's style is unusual, you can't deny that, therefore i'm asking if someone knows how he usually acts in general, idk why you're even trying to represent that as me reading him in a specific way

In post 91, Akarin wrote:

In post 89, NicCage wrote: Uh it's not you, it's me.

Should I be voting for this DoubtingThomas character?

That's what they all say *sniffle*

And it depends on how much you like early Day 1 Dastardly Deed -1 (DD-1?)

DT is my top scumread right now, but...

---

It's 5 to Perform a Dastardly Deed

Well yeah if I vote it's on me. But would you vote for him? Is he a D1DD-1 for you, or just a D1DD-2?

In post 93, DoubtingThomas wrote:what's this scummy question

It's a regular, normal question with only good intentions. What makes you think it's scummy?

In post 103, Gypyx wrote:None of the above, nic's style is unusual, you can't deny that, therefore i'm asking if someone knows how he usually acts in general, idk why you're even trying to represent that as me reading him in a specific way

Why not just ask me?

In post 105, NicCage wrote:Why not just ask me?

Why not just answer me?

In post 106, Gypyx wrote:

In post 105, NicCage wrote:Why not just ask me?

Why not just answer me?

Okay. I think my posting is normal enough.

Now what? I wonder, is there anything you're getting at? If you don't think my posting is particularly scummy or particularly townie, what purpose does this question serve?
And as far as DT goes, is he worth an L-1 vote to you, or just L-2?

In post 103, Gypyx wrote:None of the above, nic's style is unusual, you can't deny that, therefore i'm asking if someone knows how he usually acts in general, idk why you're even trying to represent that as me reading him in a specific way

nah that is not a townie mindset.

Again, if someone's style is 'unusual' and if you are genuine about solving someone 'unusual' it's townie for you to be the actually trying to interact with t hat slot and/or figure it out

just saying undirected question gets nothing done. i've seen way more scums just ask (not necessarily the same type of) questions in the open air that a lot of people either don't have answer to or answer is straightforward to make it seem it's more obvious that you are asking questions, but in reality those questions doesn't really help any of your solving (e.g. why is X a wagon?)

I really believe if you are town and you genuine thought nic's posting to be weird, you should be asking nic the questions yourself especially by pointing out what was weird/what you are confused about

in fact, you actually NEVER asked nic any questions yourself, you just openly said, "does anyone know this guy's meta?" and then for some reason you think you asked nic yourself, which you never have..

i am thinking this is slip. you don't even know who you directed your questions to, but yout hink you are asking questions. this literally shows you don't care if your questions get answered or not, you are just throwing shit (questions) to the wall and hope it sticks.

you never cared about your question about getting nic's meta anwered by someone. you never asked nic himself to solve his slot. yet you pretend i am misrepresenting you, and also when nic does come in, instead of trying to solve or ask him legit questions, you mistakenly thought you asked him any sort of relevant question, which you have not.

you are a wolf.

In post 98, Gypyx wrote:Also, nic's style of posting is really weird, does anyone know them?

In post 103, Gypyx wrote:None of the above, nic's style is unusual, you can't deny that, therefore i'm asking if someone knows how he usually acts in general, idk why you're even trying to represent that as me reading him in a specific way

In post 106, Gypyx wrote:

In post 105, NicCage wrote:Why not just ask me?

Why not just answer me?

What questions did he ask nic?

What kind of town forget the questions they ask? This guy obviously isn't even paying attention to the questions he's asking people. He's just pretending to ask questions, and do not care about actually getting answers about them. Which is more likely a wolf than town.

In post 43, Gypyx wrote:Tris could you write you name smaller please? It's quite annoying to read it like that


Also thomas acknowledges the vote on him as RVS and yet he still acts as if he's being seriously suspected
VOTE: Thomas

This further matches with this weird post, which I still do not understand where he comes from AND skye, the person who was the one who interacted with me even thinks is a very awkward misrep/push gypyx is trying to cast upon, and consequently is voting me for.

I think I am never moving off of gypyx. This guy's posts are bleeding wolf, and it is now officially thunderdome time. We need to either kill me or gypyx today.

In post 103, Gypyx wrote:None of the above, nic's style is unusual, you can't deny that, therefore i'm asking if someone knows how he usually acts in general,

idk why you're even trying to represent that as me reading him in a specific way

Bolded strikes me as a very strange point to get defensive over. If a question has no relevance to reads, why ask it?
A town response to the criticism should be to elaborate.

Gypyx’s posting looks to me like easy coasting. He’s not pressing his read on Thomas, nor is he developing any new reads through any kind of purposive questioning. Instead, I see only two lightweight questions, about my posting and mastina’s reads, neither question is likely to go anywhere. That could add up to an attempt to appear active without attracting to much attention or committing to anything.

VOTE: Gypyx After double-checking, this is DD-2.

I would like answers to all my previous questions

Something something frozen

In post 104, NicCage wrote: Well yeah if I vote it's on me. But would you vote for him? Is he a D1DD-1 for you, or just a D1DD-2?

I don't think it's a question of read strength so much as playstyle, strategy, and how spicy you're feeling. The game is smaller than I'm used to. I think in a 13p I probably would, but we have 1 Mistaken Dastardly Deed instead of 3 here so taking more time to look at past games and get real contributions from everyone Day 1 seems more important, and if DT is groupscum and we Mob Justice them correctly, doing it too early leaves less room to look for associations with the partner.

So no, I wouldn't, but an excitable spicy corner of my heart really wants to, especially in light of the 1v1 declaration.

Both because it seems like an over-reaction to pressure, and because I think it'd generate some interesting interactions from the other players.

Like the run of posts starting with post 108, I think DT actually have a point but is also hugely overselling it.

The overselling it seems even more suspicious to me.

But I'm also pretty okay with a Gypyx elimination at the moment.

In post 95, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 91, Akarin wrote: I think it’s currently at
DT (3): Akarin, Gypyx, Mastina
gypyx (2): DT, SKYE
SKYE (1): PlusJOYED
NicCage (1): Nona

Not Voting: (2): Dunn, NicCage

---

For future reference, Page 2 DT vs. SKYE peak wagons were:
DT (3): Akarin, SKYE, Gypyx
SKYE (3): PlusJOYED, Mastina, DT

1 scum in akarin/gypxy/mastina

and 1 in skye/plustjoyed/nona/dunn/niccage i think

What about the votecounts makes you think this?

In post 102, DoubtingThomas wrote:i can go with akarin/gypyx/mastina very not likely to w/w

Also why?

In post 113, Akarin wrote:we have 1 Mistaken Dastardly Deed instead of 3 here

Um, not 1 instead of 3, it's 2 instead of 3. Points stands, just said wrong number.

In post 68, Nona wrote:that's interesting

considering that ari also expected to be read better by you, i guess it's likely true.

VOTE: NicCage

So, does Nic's recent posting make you feel better or worse about him?

And what do you think of Gypyx's questions about Nic's posting, you seem like you might have a perspective closer to Gypyx's?

In post 107, NicCage wrote:

In post 106, Gypyx wrote:

In post 105, NicCage wrote:Why not just ask me?

Why not just answer me?

Okay. I think my posting is normal enough.

Now what? I wonder, is there anything you're getting at? If you don't think my posting is particularly scummy or particularly townie, what purpose does this question serve?
And as far as DT goes, is he worth an L-1 vote to you, or just L-2?

I find your entrance / the way you mostly do some small questions unusual

And i'd rather have a better understeanding of your posting in order to sort you more efficiently

Definetly worth an exe-1 vote

Ok so thomas is making an enormous fuss about me asking about me asking questions about someone's meta, which like, is not AI in any way

Like, sure thomas's case is wordy, but he repeats his points a lot, to compensate for the lack of content in it

He's even getting to the point of not understeanding the obvious formulation of my post, which has got to be the biggest tunnel i have ever seen of simply just deliberate

And also, to anyone who's interested i have already asked open questions about someone's meta before, and i am the kind of person to forget what questions i asked / accidentally make up others

Would be cool to hear from the less active players

Akarin, Gypyx, mastina
DoubtingThomas, SKYEscrapers, NicCage
PlusJOYED
nona

Dunnstral

• slizard

[/area]

In post 69, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 62, NicCage wrote:Who should I vote for?

Why did you ask this?

Oh I thought Dunnstral was a member of the hydra.

There's at least a fair chance he could be scum here, too.

In post 83, NicCage wrote:

In post 81, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 72, NicCage wrote:Why should I?

So when I asked you why you asked the question earlier, what are you trying to do? Are you trying to sheep someone, or trying to question someone, or trying to get into the game, or what

I don’t know yet. If someone else gave you a good read, wouldn’t you follow it?

(I legit get strong scum-scum vibes from NicCage-Dunnstral's interactions.)

In post 85, Gypyx wrote:Could you like, elaborate on these reads instead of just saying town / scum? I'd especially like to see your reason behind the read on nona and thomas

Can I? Yes.

Will I?

Only if need be, and right now I don't feel the need to, so no.