In post 93, Datisi wrote:if that were almost anyone else, i'd start screaming for their head because they're obviously making it up as they go, but gut tells me this is not *completely* out of t3's townrange.
I have limited experience with T3, but this is about where I'm at with it as well.
-----
Seanzie, any thoughts about the Flubber/Umlaut interaction?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 6:12 am
by T3
In post 93, Datisi wrote:if that were almost anyone else, i'd start screaming for their head because they're obviously making it up as they go, but gut tells me this is not *completely* out of t3's townrange.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 6:13 am
by T3
I don't think Flubber taking it seriously is AI.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 6:19 am
by Datisi
i mean, that's not my issue here... my issue is that you said umlaut is scummy for "taking [flubber's] rvs interaction seriously" (57), and then later on saying that "flubber's reacting to something that wasn't totally rvs" (72) which makes it sound like you did actually think that flubber's post/interaction was not rvs, so.
and after i asked about it, you only then voted umlaut, saying you'd answered that already, then realizing you didn't, answering onl after being prodded about it again, and *then* unvoting umlaut after being prodded about it too? like uh. doesn't feel like a natural thought process at all.
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
VOTE: t3
I already responded to this. Also, I think Titus's 'mindmeld' is towny.
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
VOTE: t3
I already responded to this. Also, I think Titus's 'mindmeld' is towny.
This doesn’t mesh imo
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 7:16 am
by Lukewarm
In post 82, Vulture wrote:How does one man who joins so many mafia games never learn.
I think that that might actually be part of the problem tbh
I have heard someone describe it as criminally over gamed -> criminally under focused
so I'm asking for a clarification on how serious you feel about this.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:13 am
by T3
Nah i was hard confbiasing.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:15 am
by Flubbernugget
In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong
In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong
In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong
What do you think of my idea that Seanzie may have been testing to see who would try defending/pocketing me?
In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong
What do you think of my idea that Seanzie may have been testing to see who would try defending/pocketing me?
In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong
What do you think of my idea that Seanzie may have been testing to see who would try defending/pocketing me?
I'm not seeing it and you're probably overthinking things. dude got pressured on why he voted for you then straight up lied
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:22 am
by Alchemist21
In post 1, tris wrote:IMPORTANT SPECIAL NOTE;
There are exactly three players in this game that have access to private topics.
This has been on my mind a bit, but have mods recently started putting info like this in their rulesets? This was an oddly specific detail to include and if there’s a neighborhood it means there’s a guaranteed scum in there.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:23 am
by Datisi
In post 54, Datisi wrote:@flubber, what do you find ridiculous about 34?
In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong
What do you think of my idea that Seanzie may have been testing to see who would try defending/pocketing me?
I'm not seeing it and you're probably overthinking things. dude got pressured on why he voted for you then straight up lied
He only lied if you take the “you posted more” comment literally which only you and Titus claim to have done.
In post 54, Datisi wrote:@flubber, what do you find ridiculous about 34?
see 112 116 and 120
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:32 am
by Datisi
how is that wrong? at the time of him saying that his vote became serious, alchemist was making small talk and asking people how they were? like, it seems like making friends to me... (don't think he's scum for it, but i can see the thought process as plausible.)
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:36 am
by Alchemist21
In post 122, Datisi wrote:how is that wrong? at the time of him saying that his vote became serious, alchemist was making small talk and asking people how they were? like, it seems like making friends to me... (don't think he's scum for it, but i can see the thought process as plausible.)
It was an incorrect statement because I did joke and make an RVS vote as well. I actually called it out and the response from Seanzie was just a winky face. I didn’t really know what to make of that response but just assumed he was trolling and let it go because I was more interested in the potential Seanzie wagon.
