Mafiascum.net

In post 92, CheekyTeeky wrote:Nah that's the towniest town that ever towned XD

In post 101, T3 wrote:Nero WIM < something = scum

In post 6, Dwlee99 wrote:I noticed that the site meta has changed over time.

It used to be that power roles were helpful to the town, and that claims helped solve the game. This is no longer true.

I just finished playing Sybil's Elegy which was a great example of the role distribution being designed to confuse at best, and F up at worse, the town. I have played others with similar anti-town mod shenanigans.

Here's the deal.

We should not claim, ever.

Treating the game as mountainous will increase our chances of winning.

What we should do (and I include vanilla townies) is to crumb our night choices somehow BEFORE the night. Vanilla townies must crumb fake targets.

When you're dead, and we know your role and alignment, we can go back and use the crumbs for the solve.

Solving games by way of RESULTS and CLAIMED ROLES will not work. It just doesn't work anymore.

VOTE: DGB

In post 105, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 6, Dwlee99 wrote:I noticed that the site meta has changed over time.

It used to be that power roles were helpful to the town, and that claims helped solve the game. This is no longer true.

I just finished playing Sybil's Elegy which was a great example of the role distribution being designed to confuse at best, and F up at worse, the town. I have played others with similar anti-town mod shenanigans.

Here's the deal.

We should not claim, ever.

Treating the game as mountainous will increase our chances of winning.

What we should do (and I include vanilla townies) is to crumb our night choices somehow BEFORE the night. Vanilla townies must crumb fake targets.

When you're dead, and we know your role and alignment, we can go back and use the crumbs for the solve.

Solving games by way of RESULTS and CLAIMED ROLES will not work. It just doesn't work anymore.

VOTE: DGB

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

In post 29, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 28, T3 wrote:

In post 20, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'll be using a system I have used in other games in this game. I believe Norweigh is familiar with it since I used it in a game we played together.

LOCKTOWN

TMI?

In post 31, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 14, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm gunna veto this, but still read it as Townie.

Scum?

In post 100, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 92, CheekyTeeky wrote:Nah that's the towniest town that ever towned XD

I know you're being sarcastic althought town do omgus really hard.

Roden the only reason that you are voting me is bc I called u scum while my vote wasn't on u right?

T3 wrote:Nero WIM < something = scum

In post 81, Roden wrote:Pressure on T3 isn't a bad idea, but he's more likely to sort himself for us. If he's scum he'll likely out himself the longer the game goes on, and he's likely to form incriminating associatives as well.

Can't say I'm good at actually reading him, but I've played enough games with him that I kinda know his meta. It's generally detrimental to scum to keep him around regardless of his alignment.

In post 109, Shrek wrote:ayo wtf my mans dgb been here since 2005???

In post 111, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 81, Roden wrote:Pressure on T3 isn't a bad idea, but he's more likely to sort himself for us. If he's scum he'll likely out himself the longer the game goes on, and he's likely to form incriminating associatives as well.

Can't say I'm good at actually reading him, but I've played enough games with him that I kinda know his meta. It's generally detrimental to scum to keep him around regardless of his alignment.

You're suggesting that "the longer the game goes on, and he's likely to form incriminating associatives" is a characteristic of T3 and not every player out there, so we should give T3 special treatment - only pressure, but

not eliminate

?

I'll figure out what this all means as soon as I finish scraping my brain matter from the walls.

In post 113, Nero Cain wrote:Hey Shrek what's roden saying in y'all's scum pt?

In post 114, Nero Cain wrote:Win=wants it more.

In post 114, Nero Cain wrote:Win=wants it more.

In post 116, Roden wrote:I'm panicking that you already figured out the scum team

In post 117, T3 wrote:

In post 114, Nero Cain wrote:Win=wants it more.

I never knew either I thought it meant post frequency.

In post 118, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 116, Roden wrote:I'm panicking that you already figured out the scum team

VOTE: Roden

In post 120, Roden wrote:

In post 118, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 116, Roden wrote:I'm panicking that you already figured out the scum team

VOTE: Roden

Nero associative?

In post 121, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 120, Roden wrote:

In post 118, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 116, Roden wrote:I'm panicking that you already figured out the scum team

VOTE: Roden

Nero associative?

Bad fake scum hunting?

In post 121, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 120, Roden wrote:

In post 118, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 116, Roden wrote:I'm panicking that you already figured out the scum team

VOTE: Roden

Nero associative?

Bad fake scum hunting?