Page 5 of 36
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 6:57 pm
by Galron
If you want to go To Close for Comfort or Charles in Charge I will probably have a problem.
I didn't realize that I was voting for the same playe twice, but whoever said one was rvs and the other was serious was prolly right.
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 7:05 pm
by Galron
Sorry Too Close for Comfort. I can't believe I spelled a Jim J. Bullock show incorrectly.
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 7:09 pm
by Spangled
In post 100, Galron wrote:If you want to go To Close for Comfort or Charles in Charge I will probably have a problem.
I didn't realize that I was voting for the same playe twice, but whoever said one was rvs and the other was serious was prolly right.
the person you voted for both times said that
it was me!
do you not want others in the town to take charge? I’m not sure what you’re saying here
pedit
lmao I like this not-gimmick-thing
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 8:19 pm
by Facebones
Sorry for my absence, I was either sleeping or working. On my lunch break now, but before I go back some food for thought: not reading a players post due to apathy seems worse than not reading it due to laziness. Galron, is it just Cook's posts you're apathetic towards? Why?
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 8:23 pm
by Galron
In post 102, Spangled wrote: In post 100, Galron wrote:If you want to go To Close for Comfort or Charles in Charge I will probably have a problem.
I didn't realize that I was voting for the same playe twice, but whoever said one was rvs and the other was serious was prolly right.
the person you voted for both times said that
it was me!
do you not want others in the town to take charge? I’m not sure what you’re saying here
pedit
lmao I like this not-gimmick-thing
No. No gimmick. I hadn't recalled who I voted before. And now I've got to look to see why I decideded it was a serious vote. So much work.
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 8:27 pm
by Galron
In post 103, Facebones wrote:Sorry for my absence, I was either sleeping or working. On my lunch break now, but before I go back some food for thought: not reading a players post due to apathy seems worse than not reading it due to laziness. Galron, is it just Cook's posts you're apathetic towards? Why?
I'm not apathetic toward Cook's posts. I just don't feel like reading them. I guess maybe that is apathy; I don't know. Everyone else's posts are much shorter. That's got something to do with it. Cook could be open-wolfing (I have a personal bias against that term btw), but I don't know. It seems that if anyone is wolfing (there's that term again) it up again, I, and everyone else, would be alerted to it. In a succinct manner ofc.
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:26 pm
by Spangled
In post 104, Galron wrote: In post 102, Spangled wrote: In post 100, Galron wrote:If you want to go To Close for Comfort or Charles in Charge I will probably have a problem.
I didn't realize that I was voting for the same playe twice, but whoever said one was rvs and the other was serious was prolly right.
the person you voted for both times said that
it was me!
do you not want others in the town to take charge? I’m not sure what you’re saying here
pedit
lmao I like this not-gimmick-thing
No. No gimmick. I hadn't recalled who I voted before. And now I've got to look to see why I decideded it was a serious vote. So much work.
oh no I wasn’t calling that a not-gimmick, I was calling using the names of the shows a not-gimmick
Galron wrote: In post 103, Facebones wrote:Sorry for my absence, I was either sleeping or working. On my lunch break now, but before I go back some food for thought: not reading a players post due to apathy seems worse than not reading it due to laziness. Galron, is it just Cook's posts you're apathetic towards? Why?
I'm not apathetic toward Cook's posts. I just don't feel like reading them. I guess maybe that is apathy; I don't know. Everyone else's posts are much shorter. That's got something to do with it. Cook could be open-wolfing (I have a personal bias against that term btw), but I don't know. It seems that if anyone is wolfing (there's that term again) it up again, I, and everyone else, would be alerted to it. In a succinct manner ofc.
this is a pretty different attitude to what you had at the start of the game IIRC
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:32 pm
by Spangled
hey, Facebones, you reckon DArby’s whiteknighting me a wee bit?
Thynhith, what do you think of Facebones’ entrance?
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 9:34 pm
by Spangled
MargotRosa, I see you’ve been giving attention to a few other games.
After you’re back from your D&D session, mind giving this one a bit? :D
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 1:28 am
by Facebones
In post 105, Galron wrote:I'm not apathetic toward Cook's posts. I just don't feel like reading them. I guess maybe that is apathy; I don't know. Everyone else's posts are much shorter. That's got something to do with it. Cook could be open-wolfing (I have a personal bias against that term btw), but I don't know.
It seems that if anyone is wolfing (there's that term again) it up again,
I
, and everyone else, would be alerted to it. In a succinct manner ofc.
Unless that person is Cook, because how can you be alert to an open wolf if you don't feel like reading their lengthy posts? Start being more motivated, goddamn it.
I mean, I guess there's a chance. I have accused people of whiteknighting in the past and been rather embarrassed about the whole ordeal afterwards though. Due to that, and because it's still early stages, I'm gonna put it down to being NAI
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 1:36 am
by Spangled
I have an Opinion on Facebones now but I want to see what Thynhith has to say about him before I detail it.
@Facebones yeah, I get you on the whiteknighting, and what’s more I agree; I don’t think DArby is whiteknighting me, since it seems more targeted
at
Galron than defending
me
especially since he’s disagreed with me a couple times already in-thread
I always get nervous that I’m getting pocketed/buddied, since I like to do it so much as scum
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 1:47 am
by Facebones
How come you're anxious to hear about what Thynhith makes of my entrance? Like, why him specifically?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 2:17 am
by MargotRosa
In post 8, Cook wrote:Hi folks! It's time to break NewD3!
Tracker, please claim. It's not advantageous to scum to claim Tracker.
Don't.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 2:19 am
by MargotRosa
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 2:21 am
by MargotRosa
Aside from anything else, I did the math in Newbie2076 and showed empirically that it's a terrible strat.
The fact that Cook is pushing it, after having pushed it as scum, despite, according to Cook, it not being advantageous to scum, makes me think Cook understands it's a bad strat
VOTE: Cook
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 3:41 am
by Cook
Do. We get either an IC, two confirmed Townies, or a Follow The Cop that can't be broken.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 4:09 am
by DArby
In post 99, Galron wrote: I don't really have a handle on this game yet. Well, maybe a little. I'll let Will Geer in on this; I mean that was six or seven seasons on the Walons and he almost always had a line on everyone in the cast.
Truth be told, I'm not so much of a scum hunter as a town hunter. I can spot a John Boy. But if you want me to find an Ashley Longworth, Sr or Jr, it takes me a bit of work.
Sorry, I don't get this reference, but I'll see how well this holds up.
In post 110, Spangled wrote:yeah, I get you on the whiteknighting, and what’s more I agree; I don’t think DArby is whiteknighting me, since it seems more targeted
at
Galron than defending
me
especially since he’s disagreed with me a couple times already in-thread
^ This
In post 114, MargotRosa wrote:Aside from anything else, I did the math in Newbie2076 and showed empirically that it's a terrible strat.
The fact that Cook is pushing it, after having pushed it as scum, despite, according to Cook, it not being advantageous to scum, makes me think Cook understands it's a bad strat
VOTE: Cook
I agree. If this is a plan that can be pushed by scum and say it's an advantage for town then it's not as advantageous to town as claimed. I'm fine with skipping this plan.
@MargotRosa Can I see your math?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 7:18 am
by Galron
UNVOTE:
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:11 am
by Galron
Giving Roden a town read.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:14 am
by Galron
In post 106, Spangled wrote:this is a pretty different attitude to what you had at the start of the game IIRC
I don't recall how I was at the beginning. I'm not above trying something new.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 8:16 am
by Galron
In post 109, Facebones wrote:Unless that person is Cook, because how can you be alert to an open wolf if you don't feel like reading their lengthy posts?
This proposes that you aren't reading her posts also.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:22 am
by Spangled
In post 111, Facebones wrote:How come you're anxious to hear about what Thynhith makes of my entrance? Like, why him specifically?
I want to hear what Thynhith thinks of you so I can better, or at all, read them. They’ve said only a couple things in-thread, and I want to draw them out and make them take some stances, engage them in the game. They’re obviously
around
, in some capacity, but they could be more
present
.
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:23 am
by Spangled
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:27 am
by Spangled
I would like that too!
In post 120, Galron wrote: In post 109, Facebones wrote:Unless that person is Cook, because how can you be alert to an open wolf if you don't feel like reading their lengthy posts?
This proposes that you aren't reading her posts also.
No, it doesn’t. It means that either Facebones read the posts and decided that they weren’t open-wolfy, or that he didn’t read them. Something tells me that it’s the first, rather than the second.
@Galron: why’d you unvote me? are you no longer scumreading me? why?
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:30 am
by Cook
spangled what are your thoughts on roden