Mafiascum.net

t3 VERY LIGHT TWN READ, he could be good scum, but on the face of it, he looks town, he is at least trying.
So town bloc day q:
Moz, t3, Bendover, Cool Cookie.
Derby...fck knows.

The why policy lynch is defintely worth going fro, I have been in a few agnes where town dont lynch the annoying movekty act, and it screws town over later on.

*a few games

In post 89, Pan Smierc wrote:cool cookie is a slot that seems scummy early but towntells later give em a chance everyone

wait why though

In post 100, mozamis wrote:t3 VERY LIGHT TWN READ, he could be good scum, but on the face of it, he looks town, he is at least trying.
So town bloc day q:
Moz, t3, Bendover, Cool Cookie.
Derby...fck knows.

my post where i hard scumread darby is pretty towny imo but also fakeable by scum

In post 93, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 87, Pan Smierc wrote:may i ask why?

i think it's clear why

If why is clear how are we voting him?

In post 104, T3 wrote:

In post 89, Pan Smierc wrote:cool cookie is a slot that seems scummy early but towntells later give em a chance everyone

wait why though

Ill link a large normal in a bit

In post 65, T3 wrote:something town me is really bad at is Getting Townread
in all my recent scum games except one i've endgamed

we played together before, you were pretty widely scumread as I recall, but still managed to evade danger and win as scum. probably partly thanks to me so not a happy memory

In post 64, T3 wrote:

In post 54, cool cookie wrote:

In post 41, Pan Smierc wrote:t3 town

why? sequencing felt to me like:

1. T3 makes random vote claiming "hard scumread"
2. T3 makes a point of acknowledging the "hard scumread" bit was not serious (slightly odd thing to clarify as it was obvious)
3. T3 calls out somebody for also transparently random voting on the same wagon, also slightly odd.

so my starting point is t3 mildly scummy.

In other related news VOTE: dArby

I wasn't sure if the vote was random or not.

maybe. i think it looked very likely random, and your post assumed it was very not random. it was a weird pivot in the early stages.

In post 80, ben dover123 wrote: cookie scummy

oh dear this is not good news, I'm very town on you haha.

In post 83, Klick wrote:VOTE: cookie

A lot of faer focus is currently on how fae are going to be read this game in a way that scum like to do

I think I made 1 post on that, and then responded to a follow-up question. you were actually in my last game so you would know why I thought it good to start on the right footing. so I think this take is a bit disingenius at best.

In post 84, Egix96 wrote:

In post 76, Klick wrote:

In post 73, Egix96 wrote:

In post 72, DArby wrote:

In post 57, IOnlyAskWhy wrote:

In post 23, Pan Smierc wrote:Why=fry

Why?

In post 58, IOnlyAskWhy wrote:

In post 55, cool cookie wrote:My way of words was a bit controversial in my last game.

Why?

Out of policy this can go.

VOTE: Why

Do you not think that there's enough content to be able to form even a couple of rudimentary reads? Thus kinda feels like you're just trying to take an easy way out.

What are your reads, then?

Ben is a light town lean for 61. Sure, it's thought process, but I'm not seeing much in the way of overtly towny content so far this game.

54 and 56 from cookie are bugging me, mainly because not only does fae vote one person right after calling someone else mildly scummy, but also that the latter post feels pockety.

Not only is Klick's opening post a bit LAMIST, but 44 is also awkward.

VOTE: cool cookie

I'm not really sure on the word pockety, but post 56 was an overt buddying. I have experienced Ben's play before this game, so if town he will be a key asset and he is vibing town for me so far. knowning Ben, almost a guarantee he will vote me now as is his nature.

the take on post 54 is fair. I wanted to:

A. See how people would react if I put someone at -2, especially without explanation. sometimes you can draw out a bad faith take that way (scum can assume the worst and be more close-minded than town who will consider possibilities and ask questions).
B. Particularly interested in whether it got a reaction from T3 or dArby, in case there was a hero Day 1 solve in me. seems unlikely but what if T3 and dArby were scum, T3 did the obligatory distancing vote on Day 1, and then got cold feet when it started to get a bit of momentum. since my last observation, T3 switched back to criticism of dArby. but not convinced dArby is scum individually and the reaction seemed fine.

In post 107, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 104, T3 wrote:

In post 89, Pan Smierc wrote:cool cookie is a slot that seems scummy early but towntells later give em a chance everyone

wait why though

Ill link a large normal in a bit

oh alts

...i played in a large normal before. anyway you are not giving me good vibes T3, making bold claim of your own towniness already in post 105.

it would be pretty neat if we only had 1 or less persons without an avatar

In post 112, cool cookie wrote:...i played in a large normal before. anyway you are not giving me good vibes T3, making bold claim of your own towniness already in post 105.

nah i'm saying pan is an alt
i forgot you were in 236 though

it doesnt make much difference, you still needto do pronouns

https://www.google.com/search?q=cool+co ... 8A2tql-sHM

make it this or something?

In post 111, T3 wrote:

In post 107, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 104, T3 wrote:

In post 89, Pan Smierc wrote:cool cookie is a slot that seems scummy early but towntells later give em a chance everyone

wait why though

Ill link a large normal in a bit

oh alts

Surprised you haven't recognized me since it is pretty obvious imo but dont out me rn

it would mean a lot to me because i already thought there was only one of yous without an alt and read you as the same person

mozamis wrote:The why policy lynch is defintely worth going fro, I have been in a few agnes where town dont lynch the annoying movekty act, and it screws town over later on.

But why isn't annoying...? I don't see the problem here.
And if you are town then your win condition is to kill scum, not PL anyone you think is gonna be unresolvable. Let night actions take care of that.

cool cookie wrote: A. See how people would react if I put someone at -2, especially without explanation. sometimes you can draw out a bad faith take that way (scum can assume the worst and be more close-minded than town who will consider possibilities and ask questions).
B. Particularly interested in whether it got a reaction from T3 or dArby, in case there was a hero Day 1 solve in me. seems unlikely but what if T3 and dArby were scum, T3 did the obligatory distancing vote on Day 1, and then got cold feet when it started to get a bit of momentum. since my last observation, T3 switched back to criticism of dArby. but not convinced dArby is scum individually and the reaction seemed fine.

Nooooooooo stop doing RT's please. They don't work as well as people make them out to be. Also yea this was a bad RT that shouldn't have happened.
Also wait what I've played with you before? If I'm supposed to remember who you are I unfortunately forgot because its been 6 (?) months since I was last on this site.

I retract my scumread on cookie for the time being while I reconsider how this RT affects faers alignment but bleh.

honestly i'm tempted to townread ben just because he's active

"You know an RT sucks if it backfires on you" ~ me, probably

In post 117, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 111, T3 wrote:

In post 107, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 104, T3 wrote:

In post 89, Pan Smierc wrote:cool cookie is a slot that seems scummy early but towntells later give em a chance everyone

wait why though

Ill link a large normal in a bit

oh alts

Surprised you haven't recognized me since it is pretty obvious imo but dont out me rn

for some reason i had it in my head that you were a newbie in their first game outside of the newbie queue lol
yes i like tacos

UNVOTE:



^ These two quotes are towny tbh

Also lemme pull up some stuff which made me think T3 was town
I know there was this one quote that I really don't think he makes as scum

whats an RT?