Mafiascum.net

LOL

Okay so then you know a scum has posted because of the number of people posting…

When you are reading the thread just write every thought that comes to mind on a piece of paper
When done reading, read your paper, organize it, and post that.

If you note any contradictions what are they and why did they happen?
If something is remarkable highlight it.

Yo this started. Completely forgot.
Won the last one. Gotta win this one too.

VOTE: MathBlade

Will catch up asap

bearly missed the pagetop

In post 95, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 89, MathBlade wrote:I view mafia as more a collaborative painting

I'm ok at finger paint and stick figures.

Think dw would have moved off toog if scum, liked mala's interactions on page 4.

Think there must have been one scum at least out of the five people on the toog wagon (based on how quick it moved), immediate objective should be sorting there.

In post 70, Roden wrote:

In post 67, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Is anyone voting for Toog voting because of the reasoning in 12? I'd be interested in hearing why

I voted Toog for claiming Ninja Godfather. Or whatever a "Reverse Miller Polar Bear in a Ninja Suit" is supposed to be.

Why did you think that was vote worthy?

In post 74, Greeting wrote:

In post 66, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I also think the Toog read is bizarre fwiw. I just know it's not necessarily scummy

Can 31 even be called a read? Because like, this is bad, seems intentionally bad to start a discussion about it, and worst thing about this it could all come from town who just want RVS gone even if it resorts to discussion over trivial things like that.

Math says it is and even seems to think some people might've been sheeping his read.

I kind of think we're out of RVS already, but I mostly wanted to read something that wasn't Math and Vanders talking about the read, since I wasn't getting anything out of that conversation.

In post 107, momo wrote:Think dw would have moved off toog if scum, liked mala's interactions on page 4.

Think there must have been one scum at least out of the five people on the toog wagon (based on how quick it moved), immediate objective should be sorting there.

Go on then. Who's on wagon scum?

In post 51, MathBlade wrote:

In post 50, MegAzumarill wrote:Still don't see how that would implicate town!momo but I see your point on roden

Generally if someone thinks the same thought I had (before I post it) they’re usually town.
Doesn’t always work but it’s enough to start

In post 81, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 51, MathBlade wrote:

In post 50, MegAzumarill wrote:Still don't see how that would implicate town!momo but I see your point on roden

Generally if someone thinks the same thought I had (before I post it) they’re usually town.
Doesn’t always work but it’s enough to start

Agree with this, especially since I'm fairly confident that people that I mind-meld with mostly similar thoughts are more often than not town.

So you think people who mind meld with you are often scum, which is opposite of what Math is saying.

So i'm really easy to pocket so I'm trying to be wary that math is trying to pocket me really early game so i'm just weary rn

In post 107, momo wrote: Think there must have been one scum at least out of the five people on the toog wagon (based on how quick it moved), immediate objective should be sorting there.

This was, at the time, a joke wagon, why is people moving off it relevant and not the destination to which they moved? I mean, it went a bit too far, but I still see it as a joke wagon.

In post 111, Malakittens wrote:

In post 51, MathBlade wrote:

In post 50, MegAzumarill wrote:Still don't see how that would implicate town!momo but I see your point on roden

Generally if someone thinks the same thought I had (before I post it) they’re usually town.

Doesn’t always work but it’s enough to start

In post 81, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 51, MathBlade wrote:

In post 50, MegAzumarill wrote:Still don't see how that would implicate town!momo but I see your point on roden

Generally if someone thinks the same thought I had (before I post it) they’re usually town.
Doesn’t always work but it’s enough to start

Agree with this, especially since I'm fairly confident that people that I mind-meld with mostly similar thoughts are more often than not town.

So you think people who mind meld with you are often scum, which is opposite of what Math is saying.

Let me rephrase that, because you clearly misread what I said. I meant that I'm fairly confident that people I mind-meld with are more often town.

In post 108, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:

In post 70, Roden wrote:

In post 67, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Is anyone voting for Toog voting because of the reasoning in 12? I'd be interested in hearing why

I voted Toog for claiming Ninja Godfather. Or whatever a "Reverse Miller Polar Bear in a Ninja Suit" is supposed to be.

Why did you think that was vote worthy?

Because I don't think claiming something that ridiculous when getting wagoned is a particularly townie thing to do.

I was never in fear of actually being eliminated over an obvious joke wagon that I brought upon myself.

If you're not afraid, you typically don't have to tell people how not afraid you are

VOTE: Toog

K.

In post 114, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 111, Malakittens wrote:

In post 51, MathBlade wrote:

In post 50, MegAzumarill wrote:Still don't see how that would implicate town!momo but I see your point on roden

Generally if someone thinks the same thought I had (before I post it) they’re usually town.

Doesn’t always work but it’s enough to start

In post 81, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 51, MathBlade wrote:

In post 50, MegAzumarill wrote:Still don't see how that would implicate town!momo but I see your point on roden

Generally if someone thinks the same thought I had (before I post it) they’re usually town.
Doesn’t always work but it’s enough to start

Agree with this, especially since I'm fairly confident that people that I mind-meld with mostly similar thoughts are more often than not town.

So you think people who mind meld with you are often scum, which is opposite of what Math is saying.

Let me rephrase that, because you clearly misread what I said. I meant that I'm fairly confident that people I mind-meld with are more often town.

Nah, I reread it, you are right. I apologize

In post 101, MathBlade wrote:Okay so then you know a scum has posted because of the number of people posting…

When you are reading the thread just write every thought that comes to mind on a piece of paper
When done reading, read your paper, organize it, and post that.

If you note any contradictions what are they and why did they happen?
If something is remarkable highlight it.

@Toog did you do this?

VOTE: Momo

First serious wagon of the game should be here
Only 3 posts so far (which is NAI) but 1 is an rvs vote, 1 gives lamist vibes, and the other feels like poor logic because it wasn't reasoned out and was just wanting to look solved.

In post 121, MegAzumarill wrote:VOTE: Momo

First serious wagon of the game should be here
Only 3 posts so far (which is NAI) but 1 is an rvs vote, 1 gives lamist vibes, and the other feels like poor logic because it wasn't reasoned out and was just wanting to look solvey.

EBWOP

In post 120, MathBlade wrote:

In post 101, MathBlade wrote:Okay so then you know a scum has posted because of the number of people posting…

When you are reading the thread just write every thought that comes to mind on a piece of paper
When done reading, read your paper, organize it, and post that.

If you note any contradictions what are they and why did they happen?
If something is remarkable highlight it.

@Toog did you do this?

Uh, no. Never done this before, and not gonna start now. I do the tried and true "skim read and respond."

almost....