in a not so surprising note, I don't really like him that much.
Didn't really like his soft defense of me in VOTE: 48 and I think his thought that there could be 3 scum is laughable. Would be funny if he was scum that slipped that his team was 3 wich means there'd be a traitor and guy true claimed his traitor role.
scum!nero thinks everything is amusing. And yet more shade.
in a not so surprising note, I don't really like him that much.
Didn't really like his soft defense of me in VOTE: 48 and I think his thought that there could be 3 scum is laughable. Would be funny if he was scum that slipped that his team was 3 wich means there'd be a traitor and guy true claimed his traitor role.
scum!nero thinks everything is amusing. And yet more shade.
...ain't it.
So yeah you are SCUM!! You die today!
I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of and I am by no means going to put trust into someone that could very well be scum and just throw off a miselim as "oh guess I was wrong this time".
If this is serious, make a case on them based on the current game as people who do not know nero that much can actually add onto the case, refute some points etc. Actual team style deduction, ya know?
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 7:35 pm
by Nero Cain
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?
Maybe months, if not nearly a year ago. I had a decent time off of the site, nor do I remember how many people play except those that I talk with on a regular basis and even then I try not to meta-read as it's almost useless to say, nobody is going to follow a read that they also cannot follow and meta is an easy way to just cherry pick information.
It's a terrible route to go down.
Posted: Mon May 23, 2022 7:43 pm
by NashedPotato
Maybe as a supplementary case but definitely not anywhere near primary.
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:going to put trust into someone that could very well be scum
ngl but this line seems weird and worrisome to me. You've never expressed any suspicion of VD so it comes across a bit like distancing to me.
The line is stating that I'm not just going to believe somebody's word just because they said it. I have no realistic way to verify meta, and thus it's just me either trusting or not trusting their word. Which I am not doing
pretty sure this is untrue. I mean true, I don't yell I'm town ad nausem but the idea that I don't call myself town as town is ludicrous and I don't think you actually believe this.
I feel like accusing someone of "shade" has prob lost its meaning these days. I and others are accused of "shade" all the time when it's just scumhunting. In this particular case, it was more of a cheeky comment b/c the how many scum are in a particular setup is or should be pretty easy to discern. Now over90 might actually be new and not an alt so I don't hold it against him but hamma's 3 in a 16 is
no, I am not. What makes you think the leading poster is being lazy? "zzzzzzzz" is something I post when I think things are boring. For someone that claims to know me, it sure is odd that you didn't know that.