Mafiascum.net

In post 98, Frogsterking wrote:Cape I just nailed the PoE called 2/2 scum townread everyone else on D2, do I get a prize?

Oh shit my sample size of players on maf.gg is about to increase from 7 to like 25, wish me luck.

wow im so cool

In post 100, Cape90 wrote:

In post 98, Frogsterking wrote:Cape I just nailed the PoE called 2/2 scum townread everyone else on D2, do I get a prize?

Oh shit my sample size of players on maf.gg is about to increase from 7 to like 25, wish me luck.

wow im so cool

oh wait you are talking about your own mafia.gg game lmao, I thought you were mocking me or something

This guy's defense could be called Ricochet defense at this point. he just keeps bouncing off and attacking people instead of giving a real defense in various degrees of randomness and intensity. also yes mafia.gg players are shit. thats a fact. I have played it and there are a lot of shit players. its surprising how bad some of them are. some are decent though.

^ But most quite bad

In post 101, Cape90 wrote:

In post 100, Cape90 wrote:

In post 98, Frogsterking wrote:Cape I just nailed the PoE called 2/2 scum townread everyone else on D2, do I get a prize?

Oh shit my sample size of players on maf.gg is about to increase from 7 to like 25, wish me luck.

wow im so cool

oh wait you are talking about your own mafia.gg game lmao, I thought you were mocking me or something

Yes I just played a game and there was only one helpful player in the lobby and I nailed the PoE perfect on D2 (despite no alignment flip from the D1 lim) and then somehow we lost.

I tried to play a second game but I became a spectator despite clearly clicking "become player" and accepting the ready check before the game started.

In post 104, Frogsterking wrote:and then somehow we lost.

By somehow I mean a lot of spammy navel-gazing.

In post 104, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 101, Cape90 wrote:

In post 100, Cape90 wrote:

In post 98, Frogsterking wrote:Cape I just nailed the PoE called 2/2 scum townread everyone else on D2, do I get a prize?

Oh shit my sample size of players on maf.gg is about to increase from 7 to like 25, wish me luck.

wow im so cool

oh wait you are talking about your own mafia.gg game lmao, I thought you were mocking me or something

Yes I just played a game and there was only one helpful player in the lobby and I nailed the PoE perfect on D2 (despite no alignment flip from the D1 lim) and then somehow we lost.

I tried to play a second game but I became a spectator despite clearly clicking "become player" and accepting the ready check before the game started.

sounds like the amazing experience

It's Tuesday night...did everyone get a date or something?

In post 107, Nero Cain wrote:It's Tuesday night...did everyone get a date or something?

Ye.

im alrdy bored can we kill someone now

my vote is for sale to the highest bidder until sunday

I am making Pooky a Double Voter today. Wherever Pooky Votes, my vote follows. No questions asked.

Pooky, read through logs. ISO Cape specifically. you may understand why we are voting them

In post 109, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:im alrdy bored can we kill someone now

It talks! Kill it!

Jokes aside, lot to catch up on. Fennec has some good reads that I’m tracking as well. I can’t discuss the ongoing game for obvious reasons, but there is definitely some misinformation being presented by your assessment of that unfortunately.

I started with a joke here because there’s not much else to do in the RVS. Feel like there is a lot of players that we haven’t heard from yet. Looking forward to hearing more.

I do agree that Cape looks a little suspect at this juncture. At least more than most. Let’s get this train on the tracks.

Sirrhett, do you have any reads other than fennec and cape?

UNVOTE: cape VOTE: crescent

For something something. Also, based on 75.

Crescent hasn't even been here, so I don't understand why you'd pivot to them right now

In post 115, Fennec wrote:Crescent hasn't even been here, so I don't understand why you'd pivot to them right now

I'm a deep thinker.

Glad to see out of the 100 posts almost none of them were that helpful given how objectively nai they were

but hey VOTE: Nero it wasn't all that bad

In post 48, Cape90 wrote:I find posting about posting the survey start thing to be completely pointless if you are mafia here as that part can easily be left out. It felt like random insecurity over... nothing which to me says towny concern.

Does this transfer analogically to sirrhett's comment in 113 about their rvs joke?

I need more reads from Pooky, Nero and Charlotte by the way.

I'd like marci to elaborate on the rationale for their malcolm read.

114 had an intent behind it which may have chang

PEdit

Thank you for volunteering Maria. Can you talk more about which posts you consider AI vs NAI?

In post 118, Frogsterking wrote:Thank you for volunteering Maria.

Oh no.

In post 118, Frogsterking wrote:Can you talk more about which posts you consider AI vs NAI?

that's effort? Don't you know how lazy I am? Besides the obvious RVS votes that are just >rand on if you want to call them AI or not, I think most of the stuff said so far has a level of effort put in that on a baseline looks towny (because people TR effort a lot) but on the stuff that is AI in and of itself? Not much, I suppose the conversation about Nero was the most interesting thing said in the thread so far besides the busywork questions.

In post 119, MariaR wrote:Not much, I suppose the conversation about Nero was the most interesting thing said in the thread so far besides the busywork questions.

Why, who and where?

In post 110, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:my vote is for sale to the highest bidder until sunday

In post 111, Toogeloo wrote:I am making Pooky a Double Voter today. Wherever Pooky Votes, my vote follows. No questions asked.

I bid a guaranteed hit on scum D1 and at elo with no promises in between. Do I get to be a triple voter?

In post 120, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 119, MariaR wrote:Not much, I suppose the conversation about Nero was the most interesting thing said in the thread so far besides the busywork questions.

Why, who and where?

Fourth question: what do you predict marci's rationale will be for their suspicion on MalcolmTucker?

How is it going keeping up with my iso so far?

In post 102, Fennec wrote:This guy's defense could be called Ricochet defense at this point. he just keeps bouncing off and attacking people instead of giving a real defense in various degrees of randomness and intensity.

pointing fingers is funner/better in RVS anyways.

I find all of the commotion around me strange like with the whole Frogster/Nero thing which I feel like Nero actually looked better coming off of that

Frogsterking started out townreading me 35, 46, 51
Then he reconsiders his read on 51 saying 59 making it look like a weird pocketing thing that looked w/w to me (when I thought about this more, the less it made sense, but this is still possible).
Frogster then just kinda votes me on 65 flipping """his""" read on me. If the read even is original. I don't know whether Frogster voted for 49/53 or 55 as these were the only posts that could sway him without explanation on his end.
so I post 66 right after Frog votes me, then Frog immediately in 68 calls bull on my meta. Which is fair, I didn't really think the whole thing through as it's situational also most maf.gg players stink, I was basing it off of playing privately with some actual players who knew what they were doing + phases were longer then usual.

The thing all about this is now Frogster is off of me and has gone onto Crescent who is rand right now. I can never tell if pushes behind me are always scum-motivated or not, but as far as my track record goes, it leans not so I would say Max 1 scum in Frog/Nero/Fennec. Even if the ladder I highly doubt as they are talking in a way that peeves me. But they also look solvy at the same time