Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 7:10 pm
Marci is town.
In post 90, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Huh? What do you know that I dontIn post 89, Kokabiel wrote:scum don't need to pretend to be scumhunting this game
Buttering up maybe.
OK, I see where you come from.In post 44, The Bombay wrote:
This feels like you misunderstood. My point was that the mafia would bemorecognizant of the existence of the 3rd party, while StarPower's post reads like someone who was not thinking about the existence of a 3rd party.
Therefore, town being the most likely alignment to make such a post.
Not the basis for a strong read, but as far as page 1 posts go, it is nice to have an inkling on someone
~Luke
OK, did post 74 change your read?In post 59, Passenger wrote: The difference between DeasVail and the people who have been posting but not DeasVail is two things.
1. The fact that DeasVail posted about his inability to solve. This shows that DeasVail is scum concerned whether people believe he is solving or not. Statistically this has proven to be a weak but >rand tell.
2. The content of his post. He says that he’s trying to make posts AI in his head, but can’t. Scum when out of ideas tries to do exactly that: look at posts and see if they follow a list of common tells, rather than organically notice a post and realize that it follows a tell, which town does. I suppose the gist of what I’m saying is that DeasVail is scum trying to find reads by creating thought processes, meanwhile town finds reads not by creating thought processes but by simply having those thought processes.
What a useless fucking question.In post 103, Flavia wrote:OK, did post 74 change your read?
What makes you assume Passenger is telling the truth?In post 103, Flavia wrote:Ah, psychoanalysis...not my favorite but what can you do?
In post 69, Frogsterking wrote:Thinking and reading* if you have poor control over your phonological loop.In post 67, Frogsterking wrote:Or you could listen and hit scum early more often but that would require both thinking and listening at the same time.In post 60, Passenger wrote:As such, take nearly everything he says in the early game with a grain of salt.
In post 70, Frogsterking wrote:In case anyone's confused this isn't a reaction test, I do have a full team solve I expect to be roughly 2/3 precise. I'm clarifying it's not a reaction test specifically because I know that no one interprets me to be joking because I'm sharp enough to realize a player who claims to think I'm joking is unlikely to be the telling the truth.In post 65, Frogsterking wrote:I have reviewed the thread and have a full team solve virtue of you guys being really easy reads.
In post 105, Frogsterking wrote:What a useless fucking question.In post 103, Flavia wrote:OK, did post 74 change your read?
What makes you assume Passenger is telling the truth?In post 103, Flavia wrote:Ah, psychoanalysis...not my favorite but what can you do?
In post 57, Flavia wrote:PS: I'm taking frogsterking's readings on page 1 as a joke, not them being serious
@Kookaburra I'm not as confident in my read on you as the other two, fwiw #110 at least is more likely to come from a Resident. I'll let others decide if our interactions look TvT or not.In post 110, Kokabiel wrote:Since you chose to ignore my question about why you thought i was pretending, i will be making my own conclusions on that matter.
Which one posted this and why are all of you ghosting the thread?
@BellIn post 111, Frogsterking wrote:@Kookaburra I'm not as confident in my read on you as the other two, fwiw #110 at least is more likely to come from a Resident. I'll let others decide if our interactions look TvT or not.
SureIn post 82, The Bombay wrote:can you vote kokabiel?In post 80, DeasVail wrote:Why didn’t you ask me?In post 77, The Bombay wrote:can you vote kokabielIn post 76, Frogsterking wrote:IMO I don't think you are a dull player so if you haven't seen anything suspicious yet then I think you should reread and be more open to being skeptical and critical of others. I think the idea of whether or not most posts are NAI is tricky. In this particular game I believe that a lot more AI content than usual has been created.In post 74, DeasVail wrote:I tend to think that most posts are probably NAI, at the end of the day. But particularly in the early game I think it’s helpful to think about whether particular posts are more likely from town, and to push on anything that might be from scum. For the posts made thus far, I had some thoughts along the lines of “this could be from town”, but then also counter-arguments in my head about why what I thought was town, wasn’t necessarily.In post 54, Passenger wrote:rcan you please explain what you mean by “make posts AI in your head?”In post 49, DeasVail wrote:I'm trying to make posts made so far AI in my head, but I'm not really coming up with much.
For example, I agree that Star Power’s post isn’t particularly indicative of scum, but I also can’t townread that post. In the end it’s just a colourful way of saying “let’s kill scum!”
-marci
I feel like getting wagons happening is a pretty common way of moving the game out of the early stages. Has your experience been different?In post 85, Kokabiel wrote:Awww how cute~This, on the other hand, is NOT cute at all. I fail to see how calling acquaintances to join a... RVS? vote is town behavior.
I doubt scum would blatantly call their buddies like this so thats one association down.Yuck. Can totes see this as a scum theater.In post 82, The Bombay wrote:can you vote kokabiel?In post 80, DeasVail wrote: Why didn’t you ask me?
In post 119, DeasVail wrote:@RH I think you might have missed this post