Your eagerness to find another wagon tells me how frail your belief is in this wagon, and you're the main proponent of said wagon. Scummy. Think about it for a second. I explicitly said L-1, no scum would hammer D1 under those circumstances, and no town would either, anyone who would, deserves the following lynch. Now, try again, but with better logic.RestFermata wrote:If MafiaMann doesn't talk, he'll be replaced eventually. It's conversation this game needs. There has been some conversation. If you want more, engage in it. What do you want MafiaMann to do, claim on page 4? I'm also suspicious of him, but I think it'll be to our advantage if we let him be replaced first. If we want replacements to be made, we will have to start discussion so there will be a difference between inactive and active players.
Bringing him to L-1 at this point bothers me. I feel that it's too soon, and too risky.
Unvote; Vote: Lord Gurgi
You're just holding the door wide open for a scum/idiot town quickhammer. Anti-freaking town.
Mini 683 - Intentionally Vague Mafia, Over
Forum rules
- Lord Gurgi
- Lord Gurgi
-
Lord Gurgi
- Mostly Harmless
- Mostly Harmless
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: March 26, 2004
(11:26:07 PM) thesheamuffin: I'm counting gurgi because I would probably make out with him if I were drunk enough
- RestFermata
- RestFermata
-
RestFermata
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: July 26, 2008
- Lord Gurgi
- Lord Gurgi
-
Lord Gurgi
- Mostly Harmless
- Mostly Harmless
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: March 26, 2004
Did IRestFermata wrote:I didn't even vote for MafiaMann. I FoS'ed him. Think before you talk.
say
you voted him? Doesn't mean you can't be the proponent of a wagon, good try at maintaining innocence.(11:26:07 PM) thesheamuffin: I'm counting gurgi because I would probably make out with him if I were drunk enough
- RestFermata
- RestFermata
-
RestFermata
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: July 26, 2008
I think it's BS to say I'm the main proponent of the wagon. I think it's significant that I didn't even think he was the most worthy of my vote. I want to know if his post/vote restriction really checks out, and if he's replaced I'll be interested in how his replacement treats it. I didn't call for a wagon--not that I'm against one, but I think it's prudent to wait until MafiaMann gets back before he's wagoned to the extreme.
"Time forks endlessly toward innumerable futures. In one of them I am your enemy." —Jorge Luis Borges
- forbiddanlight
- forbiddanlight
-
forbiddanlight
- Blowfish
- Blowfish
- Posts: 5882
- Joined: May 30, 2008
- Location: VA
- Contact:
umu...that last post seems to imply that deadline is tomorrow. I'm thinking an MM lynch is better than no lynch :S.
"Never have I seen anybody glorify their own lynch."
-StrangerCoug
TTGL Mafia is over. Going to mod [b]Umineko No [color=red]Na[/color]ku Koro Ni[/b] Mafia. Pre-/ins, as always, are accepted.
-StrangerCoug
TTGL Mafia is over. Going to mod [b]Umineko No [color=red]Na[/color]ku Koro Ni[/b] Mafia. Pre-/ins, as always, are accepted.
- Lawrencelot
- Lawrencelot
-
Lawrencelot
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: October 3, 2006
- Location: the Netherlands Alignment: Town
Deadline so soon? I think the mod means something else.
Okay, it's interesting to see the reactions to my "forgot my role" thing (it was not really a gambit, as it was true, but I did post it to see reactions). Most reactions to it were quite townie, whether they suspected me for it or not. But firestarter seemed very opportunistic, he saw someone doing something antitown (I don't think what I did was antitown though, of course I wouldn't deliberately forget my role to become unreadable or something) and put a vote on me. Actually, CF riot summed it up pretty well, and I agree with his post 94.
Lord Gurgi puts Mafiamann on L-1. He says it's L-1, but still I think it's too soon for the day to end. Mafiamann hasn't even had a chance to explain himself, and everybody considers him the best lynch. I don't.
Mod: please prod Mafiamann.
Maybe he meant that, but in case he didn't...Okay, it's interesting to see the reactions to my "forgot my role" thing (it was not really a gambit, as it was true, but I did post it to see reactions). Most reactions to it were quite townie, whether they suspected me for it or not. But firestarter seemed very opportunistic, he saw someone doing something antitown (I don't think what I did was antitown though, of course I wouldn't deliberately forget my role to become unreadable or something) and put a vote on me. Actually, CF riot summed it up pretty well, and I agree with his post 94.
Lord Gurgi puts Mafiamann on L-1. He says it's L-1, but still I think it's too soon for the day to end. Mafiamann hasn't even had a chance to explain himself, and everybody considers him the best lynch. I don't.
Unvote; Vote: Firestarter. FoS: Lord Gurgi
.Leaving mafiascum temporarily or not due to circumstances
That looks like deadline. Remember that this game is "Intentionally Vague." We don't have vote counts. Our Role PMs told us next to nothing. I'd expect an unexpected deadline. What else could it be? I don't think Mafiamann is a good lynch otherwise, but I'd vote him in case of a deadline.
Willing to hammer over a no lynch. Thoughts?
Willing to hammer over a no lynch. Thoughts?
KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare
- RestFermata
- RestFermata
-
RestFermata
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: July 26, 2008
If it really is deadline, a MafiaMann lynch would probably be better than a no lynch, I agree. But I think Kmd shouldn't hammer. What if it really isn't deadline? And what the hell is wrong with letting MafiaMann get deadline lynched instead of hammering him?
"Time forks endlessly toward innumerable futures. In one of them I am your enemy." —Jorge Luis Borges
QFT, though you seem a bit frantic about a MM lynch.RestFermata wrote:If it really is deadline, a MafiaMann lynch would probably be better than a no lynch, I agree. But I think Kmd shouldn't hammer. What if it really isn't deadline? And what the hell is wrong with letting MafiaMann get deadline lynched instead of hammering him?
Looking for someone with modding experience to review a mini theme, pm me if interested.
- RestFermata
- RestFermata
-
RestFermata
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: July 26, 2008
EBWOP: This is assuming of course that at the deadline, the one with majority votes will be lynched. Thats the usual for most games, right?Scattered wrote:QFT, though you seem a bit frantic about a MM lynch.RestFermata wrote:If it really is deadline, a MafiaMann lynch would probably be better than a no lynch, I agree. But I think Kmd shouldn't hammer. What if it really isn't deadline? And what the hell is wrong with letting MafiaMann get deadline lynched instead of hammering him?
Looking for someone with modding experience to review a mini theme, pm me if interested.
This
MafiaMann (5) - Drake, Forbiddanlight, Sun Tzu, Scattered, LG
Sun Tzu (2) - Kmd, Riot
LG (1) - Restfermata
Firestarter (1) - Lawrencelot
Lawrencelot (1) - Firestarter
Non-voters: Rich, MafiaMann
----
Scattered, why in post 95 did you agree with me that FS made a scum move, but didn't vote him? You weren't voting anyone at the moment. Your next vote was MafiaMann, who at that point went to L-2.
Lawrencelot, do you still suspect MafiaMann, and if LG had not put him at L-1 would you still be voting him? Would you vote him at deadline? Of the two, who do you suspect more: Firestarter or MafiaMann?
For that reason, switching my vote to
Vote Count
made possible by CF Riot
, and the contributions of voters like you. MafiaMann (5) - Drake, Forbiddanlight, Sun Tzu, Scattered, LG
Sun Tzu (2) - Kmd, Riot
LG (1) - Restfermata
Firestarter (1) - Lawrencelot
Lawrencelot (1) - Firestarter
Non-voters: Rich, MafiaMann
----
Scattered, why in post 95 did you agree with me that FS made a scum move, but didn't vote him? You weren't voting anyone at the moment. Your next vote was MafiaMann, who at that point went to L-2.
Lawrencelot, do you still suspect MafiaMann, and if LG had not put him at L-1 would you still be voting him? Would you vote him at deadline? Of the two, who do you suspect more: Firestarter or MafiaMann?
Mod: Prod/Replace Rich
. Hasn't posted yet all game. For that reason, switching my vote to
Vote: Sun Tzu
for posting nothing at all then asking for the day to be over, while voting MafiaMann with no reason attached.- Lawrencelot
- Lawrencelot
-
Lawrencelot
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: October 3, 2006
- Location: the Netherlands Alignment: Town
I think it's safe to assume that, at deadline, the one with the most votes is lynched. I think this is the rule:rules wrote:If we hit something, the someone with the most somethings will be something'd and all someones not wearing a seatbelt will be flung through the windshield. If there is a something, the someone who reached that number of somethings first is something'd.
"If we hit deadline, the players with the most votes will be lynched and all players not wearing a seatbelt will be flung through the windshield (?). If there is a tie, the player who reached that number of votes first is lynched. "
I suspect Mafiamann since the start, but by far not enough to lynch him. If LG had not put him at L-1 I would not still be voting him, because Firestarter looks scummier now. I would only vote for Mafiamann at deadline if it makes a difference between lynch and no lynch, or if he becomes my top suspect of course.CF wrote:Lawrencelot, do you still suspect MafiaMann, and if LG had not put him at L-1 would you still be voting him? Would you vote him at deadline? Of the two, who do you suspect more: Firestarter or MafiaMann?
Also, I am pretty sure there is at least 1 scum on Mafiamann's wagon, it doesn't look like a 100% town wagon. But I don't know who that would be.
Leaving mafiascum temporarily or not due to circumstances
- JDodge
- JDodge
-
JDodge
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
- Contact:
Something Count
Someone - (Some) (Some People)
Someone - (Some) (Some People)
Someone - (Some) (Some People)
Someone - (Some) (Some People)
Someone - (Some) (Some People)
Someone - (Some) (Some People)
Please pay something to the newly added something #11.
MafiaMann and Rich will be something'd.
- RestFermata
- RestFermata
-
RestFermata
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: July 26, 2008
Rule 11:
Maybe this means we have to request prods, and it's our responsibility to keep this game moving? Seems consistent with:JDodge wrote:11. I will not something someone unless someone asks. It will be some people's responsibility to keep this something doing something.
But it's possible he means "replaced"...JDodge wrote:MafiaMann and Rich will be something'd.
"Time forks endlessly toward innumerable futures. In one of them I am your enemy." —Jorge Luis Borges
- Firestarter
- Firestarter
-
Firestarter
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
LOL....CF Riot wrote:Opportunistic, hoping a lot of people will hop onto a wagon based on anti-town rather than scummy play. Gives a disclaimer to shuck responsibility for his vote, "getting the day started." Scum move.Firestarter wrote:in the interests of getting this day started, and for the simple fact that the mod specifically mentioned that this game would start when ALL players picked up their PM, Im gonna...
UNVOTE..
VOTE: Lawrencelot
BW time folks!!
FoS: Firestarter.
It worked
___________
Anywhooo... for reasons expressed beforehand...
Unvote:
Vote: MafiaMann/
Vote: MafiaMann/
('') (':') ('')
- Firestarter
- Firestarter
-
Firestarter
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: April 20, 2008
- Location: Eire
I didn't think it was enough to warrant a vote to be honest. I believed a IGMEOY was enough in that case. And I think my vote on MM was well reasoned, wasn't it?CF Riot wrote:ThisVote Countmade possible byCF Riot, and the contributions of voters like you.
MafiaMann (5) - Drake, Forbiddanlight, Sun Tzu, Scattered, LG
Sun Tzu (2) - Kmd, Riot
LG (1) - Restfermata
Firestarter (1) - Lawrencelot
Lawrencelot (1) - Firestarter
Non-voters: Rich, MafiaMann
----
Scattered, why in post 95 did you agree with me that FS made a scum move, but didn't vote him? You weren't voting anyone at the moment. Your next vote was MafiaMann, who at that point went to L-2.
Lawrencelot, do you still suspect MafiaMann, and if LG had not put him at L-1 would you still be voting him? Would you vote him at deadline? Of the two, who do you suspect more: Firestarter or MafiaMann?
Mod: Prod/Replace Rich. Hasn't posted yet all game.
For that reason, switching my vote to
Vote: Sun Tzufor posting nothing at all then asking for the day to be over, while voting MafiaMann with no reason attached.
Looking for someone with modding experience to review a mini theme, pm me if interested.
- DraketheFake
- DraketheFake
-
DraketheFake
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 918
- Joined: September 1, 2008
A good post amidst a sea of iffy ones, especially from Gurgi.RestFermata wrote:I think it's BS to say I'm the main proponent of the wagon. I think it's significant that I didn't even think he was the most worthy of my vote. I want to know if his post/vote restriction really checks out, and if he's replaced I'll be interested in how his replacement treats it. I didn't call for a wagon--not that I'm against one, but I think it's prudent to wait until MafiaMann gets back before he's wagoned to the extreme.
Misrep? Check. Intimation of chaining lynches? Check. ByLord Gurgi wrote:Your eagerness to find another wagon tells me how frail your belief is in this wagon,and you're the main proponent of said wagon.Scummy. Think about it for a second.I explicitly said L-1, no scum would hammer D1 under those circumstances, and no town would either, anyone who would, deserves the following lynch.Now, try again, but with better logic.
your own logic[/b], a quick hammer on MafiaMann is a "good thing" because it "moves the day along," or something. There's really no difference between L-1 and L-2 for the purposes of pressuring somebody to tell us what he meant, and your seeming unwillingness to concede that discussion could continue on other players without putting a hardcore lurker at L-1 before any sort of deadline was even hinted at strikes me as anti-town.
He's voting you for trying to end the day as early as possible and not giving your reasons for your vote beyond that, which is - to be fair - only what he said when he voted for you.
Unvote, Vote: Lord Gurgi
. Hahaha, very nice. You either agree with it or you find some part of it noteworthy, not both.Scattered wrote:QFT, though you seem a bit frantic about a MM lynch.
Well, I mean I guess you could go ahead an do some analysis, but then you might actually be *gasp* playing.Sun Tzu wrote:What is there to post on day 1 when we know nothing?
You're voting me for not pretending to have something to say?
He's voting you for trying to end the day as early as possible and not giving your reasons for your vote beyond that, which is - to be fair - only what he said when he voted for you.