↑dramonic wrote:
All I remember is the third-party/third-party/town masonry from RMMMM. It was bastard, but it IS reck.
What IS more likely is that this magic neighbourhood already existed, and reck just decided that "lolz its a 5 men neighbourhood, let's dump all the hydras in it for the lolz" and spiked the randomizer. He wouldn't just pull a QT out of his ass 3 secs before the game starts.
This hilariously bad wagon on Wyrd is sad.
That said, Wyrd's hydra reads are awful. OD and SPB are
quite
scummier than kawaii and Chessderp.
We should still lynch BT/thunderhog first. They're full of scummy goodness.
Your ISO is literally devoid of scumhunting or anything resembling effort.
It's k, you get used to it after a while.
PEDIT: It's me.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:21 pm
by Quilford
↑Wyrd wrote:did quilford seriously just post a quote wall of every game hes voted without reasons in it
Quilford wrote:I'm pretty sure after I said Empking was 'goodposting' waaaaaay back when, and Meransiel called it 'buddying', he instantly tried to distance from me. I'm also pretty sure he's been sheeping almost all game. Plus Mask's reactions have made me unsure about voting him.
↑vollkan wrote:How? Quilford claimed he'd done something for X reason. X reason did not appear to make sense. So I questioned him about it.
Yes, it didn't end up being a smoking gun, but that doesn't mean it was "silly" - nor does it mean I was "trying too hard" (hint: "The Interrogator" is my title for a reason)
It was dragged out far too long for how little sense it made as a push.
Time-wise, it lasted 45 minutes.
If you want to talk about things that don't make sense lasting too long, maybe try looking at the first 15 pages of this game.
More constructively:
- Quilford's 343 contained two relevant points:
1) Impliedly, that the p-dra wagon had a risk of going to lynch; and
2) Expressly, that Quilford had decided p-dra was town.
- 1) above was plainly false and 2) was unexplained
- In 350, quilford then added that the reason for the unvote was to "free" his vote. This doesn't make sense because, like I said, you're just as free to move your vote to a player when you are voting somebody else as you are when you are not voting anybody
- 355: I respond to Quilford's argument that the wagon was getting high (It wasn't)
- 361 is just me clarifying the same point about "freeing" (which Quilford argued was being too technical)
- 369: he explained at least the fact that he was compiling the list, so I ended pursuit there.
have at it kuribo and vollkan; with 40 pages i don't even know who to place a vote on
First you vote the P-dra for lulz, then you unvote the thing because you find it "townie" without explanation, then for some reason you're on Drench and then you sheep the crowd on Wyrd... no explanation. Then unvote? It's all very sketch.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:33 pm
by Quilford
I love how you need to amend 'It's all very sketch' to that to indicate that we should be reading this as scummy behaviour as opposed to can't-be-fucked-town behaviour.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:33 pm
by Quilford
↑zoraster wrote:come on, kuribo. That was kind of awesome.
there's actually a few more, but i'm saving that for the special collector's edition! can't put all your eggs in one basket, ha ha
↑vollkan wrote:How? Quilford claimed he'd done something for X reason. X reason did not appear to make sense. So I questioned him about it.
Yes, it didn't end up being a smoking gun, but that doesn't mean it was "silly" - nor does it mean I was "trying too hard" (hint: "The Interrogator" is my title for a reason)
It was dragged out far too long for how little sense it made as a push.
Time-wise, it lasted 45 minutes.
If you want to talk about things that don't make sense lasting too long, maybe try looking at the first 15 pages of this game.
More constructively:
- Quilford's 343 contained two relevant points:
1) Impliedly, that the p-dra wagon had a risk of going to lynch; and
2) Expressly, that Quilford had decided p-dra was town.
- 1) above was plainly false and 2) was unexplained
- In 350, quilford then added that the reason for the unvote was to "free" his vote. This doesn't make sense because, like I said, you're just as free to move your vote to a player when you are voting somebody else as you are when you are not voting anybody
- 355: I respond to Quilford's argument that the wagon was getting high (It wasn't)
- 361 is just me clarifying the same point about "freeing" (which Quilford argued was being too technical)
- 369: he explained at least the fact that he was compiling the list, so I ended pursuit there.
Here's something I was looking for.
This answers one of your questions Quilford.
1. wasn't plainly false to me, call it the heat of the moment
2. unexplained =/= reasonless. it just happens that i didn't put my reasons in the unvote post, because i didn't think it was worth the effort.
THEN SUDDENLY I AM SCUM FOR UNVOTING WITHOUT REASONS WHOOPS
↑Quilford wrote:are you going to be absurdly technical about this? i only have one vote. therefore, i need to unvote to replace it. even by typing 'vote: y' i am still unvoting.
my point is, what harm was your vote doing on pretentious if you wanted to replace it? if you no longer supported the wagon, why didn't you explain your reason for that at the time? don't you think the town should know why you felt pretentious was town?
sure, but unexplained votes and unvotes are common. the town should know why i felt pretentious was town but in my opinion the reasons weren't compelling enough to be explained.
Why did the drench read make you think they were town?
because it was a good point expressed with townie conviction
What is "townie conviction"?
a tone of conviction that comes off as very sincere and therefore probably comes from town
and these were the reasons
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:36 pm
by Pretentiousdra
↑Wyrd wrote:I'mma tell you what you do see: CHESSKID trying to be brazen about his scumplay, because it's all he knows how to do ("Chesskid and LLD wouldn't just start bussing for no reason... and then he wouldn't try to shoot his scum partner and claim vig, right?"). He's hoping that if he hells SCUMSLIPSCUMREAD FATE ABSENT AND AFRAID, the momentum will be enough to dampen any important questions.
Also I'm sorry this is BULLSHIT.
I DISTANCED AND VOTED LLD IN THAT GAME THEN WHEN IT WAS ACTUALLY LOOKING LIKE A LYNCH I VOTED TEH FUCK OFF, WHICH IS WHY I GOT IN TROUBLE, AND SPYREX WAS WALKING DEAD SO I MIGHT AS WELL HAVE SHOT HIM.
THIS IS CHESSTOWN HAS A SCUMREAD IS GOING TO LYNCH IT.
I hAVEN't SAID SCUMSLIPPED. I've said BEEN OBVSCUM. BECAUSE YOU. ARE. OBV. FUCKIJNG. SCUM
Pedit: Dw about it Quilford DGB is scum
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:36 pm
by Pretentiousdra
↑Wyrd wrote:I'mma tell you what you do see: CHESSKID trying to be brazen about his scumplay, because it's all he knows how to do ("Chesskid and LLD wouldn't just start bussing for no reason... and then he wouldn't try to shoot his scum partner and claim vig, right?"). He's hoping that if he hells SCUMSLIPSCUMREAD FATE ABSENT AND AFRAID, the momentum will be enough to dampen any important questions.
Also I'm sorry this is BULLSHIT.
I DISTANCED AND VOTED LLD IN THAT GAME THEN WHEN IT WAS ACTUALLY LOOKING LIKE A LYNCH I VOTED TEH FUCK OFF, WHICH IS WHY I GOT IN TROUBLE, AND SPYREX WAS WALKING DEAD SO I MIGHT AS WELL HAVE SHOT HIM.
THIS IS CHESSTOWN HAS A SCUMREAD IS GOING TO LYNCH IT.
I hAVEN't SAID SCUMSLIPPED. I've said BEEN OBVSCUM. BECAUSE YOU. ARE. OBV. FUCKIJNG. SCUM
Pedit: Dw about it Quilford DGB is scum
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:37 pm
by Quilford
Now, enough about me. I'm awfully embarrassed I haven't yet managed to secure universal townreads, and I will try harder next time. Let's move on.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:39 pm
by Pretentiousdra
What are your important fucking questions? Why is chesskid buddying people in a QT he has townreads on? MANNNNNNN THAT'S A REALLY BIG SCANDAL RIGHT THERE.
CHESSKID BUDDIES HYDRA BUDDY.
NEWS AT 11
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:39 pm
by Pretentiousdra
>Buddying
>finding reads in common with
>2012
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:41 pm
by dramonic
Cap posting is cute and all, but you cant really be taken seriously while pushing a Wyrd lynch.
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:42 pm
by Pretentiousdra
There's scum in my QT.
The only scum in my QT
We could coordinate night actions if there weren't scum in my QT
Why is there some rule that we can't lynch Fate scum day 1 instead of waiting fucking ages to do it?
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:43 pm
by dramonic
There is scum in your QT, and you CAN lynch Fate scum day 1.
The issue is that there is no Fate scum here, only your delusion.
