Mafiascum.net

In post 1000, Svenskt Stål wrote:Desp you are scummy yo.

In post 998, Ravenpaw wrote:

In post 992, MonkeyMan576 wrote:

In post 990, Ravenpaw wrote:

In post 978, MonkeyMan576 wrote:

Unvote:
Vote: Desperado

What is the point of this vote at this stage of the day? Desp is not going to gather 10 more votes in a day.
Do something helpful and vote for Krabs.

I would, if I thought he was scum.

Why do you think he's town?

In post 896, Desperado wrote:If it's a theory discussion that you have no interest in having, then how are you using it as a tell? In order for "he's playing opportunistically" to be a legitimate tell, you must have some sort of baseline where my play goes from "not opportunistic" to "opportunistic," in which case you should have no problem telling me what that is. If you can't (or won't), then are you just admitting that you were applying a blanket statement that didn't really hold any meaning?

And my point was, my definition of "playing opportunistically" is following whatever wagon is popular at the moment with the most surface level analysis possible to accompany it. If there is a clear line of thinking re: my read on Krabs (in other words, I publically stated he was a suspect of mine earlier in the game, and when he did something extremely scummy, I voted him), to me, that is not opportunistic. If I had never mentioned Krabs before voting him for his reaction to GCBC's gambit then I would understand where you are coming from, but given the actual context, I simply don't, and you aren't doing a whole lot to help me understand.

In post 1007, Desperado wrote:I'm scum because I'm not in favor of "extending the deadline

for as long as it takes to replace squid and Krab

"?

He's already been looking for two three days, and this is now a 41 page day one. What if he never finds both replacements? Or even one? We just sit here, waiting, posting, and making the game even longer and less appealing to a potential replacement?

And I specifically said

"if these are my only two options,"

implying that if there was an option for three days, or five days, or a week, that I would be in favor of it. But I'm not going to commit myself to a game that may never end.

In post 956, ferretlover wrote:Let's try to bring it up to 4-5 votes and then see how malcom responds to it.

In post 999, Desperado wrote:If those are my only two options then I'm against. I'm not in favor of indefinitely extending the day...I think the other 19 of us should be able to figure something out without potentially holding D1 up forever.

In post 1005, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really see the town gaining anything from it.

In post 1007, Desperado wrote:We just sit here, waiting, posting, and making the game even longer and less appealing to a potential replacement?

In post 1011, xMALCOLMx wrote:

In post 956, ferretlover wrote:Let's try to bring it up to 4-5 votes and then see how malcom responds to it.

I won't respond to it if the case is still "This isn't Nacho's town game".

In post 999, Desperado wrote:If those are my only two options then I'm against. I'm not in favor of indefinitely extending the day...

I think the other 19 of us should be able to figure something out without potentially holding D1 up forever.

We can extend it so the leading wagon can get replaced and claim.

In post 1005, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really see the town gaining anything from it.

A claim, for one.

In post 1007, Desperado wrote:We just sit here, waiting, posting, and making the game even longer and less appealing to a potential replacement?

Or we could lynch someone. The appeal to fear of "the game will last forever if we get an extension" is stupid and inaccurate.

In post 1010, Desperado wrote:If Krabs were Doctor or Cop then I think he would have claimed when he felt threatened enough to soft claim, as other people have already stated.

I can't control the way other people vote, and you calling me bad because of your unconfirmed reads on other players who are also voting similarly to me is just astounding.

Finally, what do you suggest if he never finds a Krab replacement then?

In post 1016, Desperado wrote:Why are you laughing at me when other people share my view on his soft claim, Sven? Your opinion is not The One True Way.

What information, specifically? Your personal opinion of who is scummy? This is a pretty insane standard you are trying to set.

In post 1019, xMALCOLMx wrote:You guys act like you've never been wrong about someone being town. Someone else asked and it hasn't been answered...why is Krabs town?

There are theories going around as to what scum may or may not be doing in this situation. How about some facts? Like Krabs' contradictory patterns?

In post 959, Amethyst Actor wrote:Sven, I am reading the thread and I don't like the reason on Cops. if there is a good reason, it's not coming from you because it isn't present in your Iso, I am reading I wouldn't be able to make questions and comments if I wasn't.

I will say the vote on Malcom is shit, because it is shit. they are so transparently town that I have no fucking clue to why you are scum reading them, all I can see is "Nacho is lurking" which is a shitty reason to have to vote for anyone

and even so, you ignore a fair amount of other lurkers who have done nothing. You still havn't addressed that point.

Questions are easy to post as scum, sure but they are my biggest weapon in games, especially in larges and it doesn't help when people decide to ignore them