Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 12:58 pm
*she, her, etc. Sorry tex.
1. Meta cases are garbage.In post 988, CultOfAthena wrote:I'm not voting mozamis. Unless he haswidlyimproved his scumgame as of recent, he's almost certainly town here. I've seen mozamis as scum before, and he simplycannotreplicate his posting style as town.
Is there some reason we've all eliminated Beefster as a lynch today? Nothing about his reaction has changed my mind, and that's still where I'd like to lynch today. Absent the votes required I would switch to EP, but I'm still far more confident in scum Beefster.
In post 519, RadiantCowbells wrote:oh and btw there's a thing I want to point out which is sort of why I claimed anyway
the correct play mechanically is to run jailkeeper/IC/tracker. 2-shot vig and 1-shot cop are far ahead of the others in power level, though there is some argument to be made for running jailkeeper/vig BUT that would mean that scum didn't run IC which would be stupid so like if I were scum I'd have run jailkeeper/vig/IC but since there's a confirmed tracker if scum thought about what they were doing at all we're looking at tracker/jailkeeper/IC
so most likely there is a jailkeeper in this game and since scum have no PRs I can only know if I was jailkept if I am in fact tracker
which is another way of saying that the jailkeeper, if any, should flip two coins and unless both come up tails you should jail me, and since scum already know whether or not a jailkeeper exists in the setup I'm not giving them any information by hardclaiming my result at the start of tomorrow
it's genius really
VOTE: TexcatIn post 1004, texcat wrote:VOTE: Beefster
I think it was the whole volunteering to be lynched thing that pushed him to the scum side for me.
Why? Beef was under a lot of pressure. He got to L-1 or L-2. Have you never seen scum do something like that to avoid being lynched?In post 1005, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: TexcatIn post 1004, texcat wrote:VOTE: Beefster
I think it was the whole volunteering to be lynched thing that pushed him to the scum side for me.
I find it flagrantly unbelievable that someone would actually say this.
In post 911, Transcend wrote: "WE SHALL LYNCH BEEFSTER HE IS THE OBVSCUM VOTE: BEEFSTER I AM THE BEST EVER BLA BLA BLA"
"duhhhh sure rc VOTE: beefster"
"OBVTOWN OBVTOWN OBVTOWN OBVTOWN"
"hey dudes beef is prob town let's not vote him VOTE: elsewhere"
"curse that damn dog, he derailed my attempt to mislynch a townie! i need a plan b quick"
"I AM THE GREAT AND MIGHTY THOR. WE SHALL LYNCH FLUBBER VOTE: FLUBBER"
"i think this will do, VOTE: flubber"
VOTE: Moneybags
i made that post before i saw flubber claimed Ic.In post 984, HeWhoSwims wrote:But - if he's not the tracker, then certainly someone is gonna CC within the next 70h? Or not?In post 974, mozamis wrote: 2) you're not conf. town. Maybe you are town that just made a bad decision. But obviously the jury is still out.
Annoyingly this is true. Transcend can probably confirm this. My scum game is - to quote Noel GallagherIn post 988, CultOfAthena wrote:I'm not voting mozamis. Unless he haswidlyimproved his scumgame as of recent, he's almost certainly town here. I've seen mozamis as scum before, and he simplycannotreplicate his posting style as town.
Is there some reason we've all eliminated Beefster as a lynch today? Nothing about his reaction has changed my mind, and that's still where I'd like to lynch today. Absent the votes required I would switch to EP, but I'm still far more confident in scum Beefster.
yeah I'm probably gonna vote Tex, i can t see people voting Thor, though if my Hewho wagon picks up steam then i think were onto a winner.In post 990, Moneybags wrote:I'd like to forward that question to moz as well.
You seem to have missed my post 970 where I started a push on tex. RC is here, you're welcome to join us.In post 922, Transcend wrote:ur probably gonna need to hard push on someone or im ust gonna lynch u
ur not soundin town anymore either