Page 41 of 323

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:30 pm
by OkaPoka
i mean

im not confident

but its the best we have

and since half the playerlist is being a poo poo and refusing to vote until "later" i dont want to be "lol sucks to suck" lynched

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:31 pm
by chennisden
In post 998, RadiantCowbells wrote:even aside from that though there's nothing that he's done that justifies anyone being confident in a read there and i'd rather hit someone who i have a better read on
^this

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:31 pm
by RadiantCowbells
who is we?

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:32 pm
by OkaPoka
everyone

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:32 pm
by chennisden
In post 969, themilkcartonkid wrote:Also, scum most definitely 8 balled RC I'm calling that right now
this is a terrible take

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:33 pm
by OkaPoka
chennis arent u the one who says better mislynch than no lynch

and tried to justify voting me bc deadline was in 4.5 days and u were worried we'd get no lynch

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:33 pm
by chennisden
mislynch better than no lynch.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:33 pm
by chennisden
In post 965, NanceFloor wrote:VOTE: tmck
hmm

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:34 pm
by OkaPoka
In post 1001, chennisden wrote:
In post 998, RadiantCowbells wrote:even aside from that though there's nothing that he's done that justifies anyone being confident in a read there and i'd rather hit someone who i have a better read on
^this
where does this come from

since you were very quick to compromise to a worse lynch that you admitted

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:34 pm
by chennisden
In post 1005, OkaPoka wrote:chennis arent u the one who says better mislynch than no lynch

and tried to justify voting me bc deadline was in 4.5 days and u were worried we'd get no lynch
shadowless wagon has no substance and will break easily.

there's more scummy people to lynch

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:35 pm
by chennisden
In post 1008, OkaPoka wrote:
In post 1001, chennisden wrote:
In post 998, RadiantCowbells wrote:even aside from that though there's nothing that he's done that justifies anyone being confident in a read there and i'd rather hit someone who i have a better read on
^this
where does this come from

since you were very quick to compromise to a worse lynch that you admitted
what do you think my read on you is?

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:38 pm
by OkaPoka
In post 681, OkaPoka wrote:and look

you vote shadowless

we have confbias who is voting me, who just indicated they tr one of my posts
we have creature who hasnt moved their vote since rvs and has fully admitted they arent reading
we have bef who is voting me to "get things done"

the foundation of my wagon is built on a pillar of lies and no conviction
In post 682, chennisden wrote:tr post neq tr slot

if you present a better alternative i will compromise. you aren't my ideal lynch at all.
i argued that my wagon had no substance and you argued that one slot had substance

you are also the person who was willing to go compromise for a worse lynch because deadline

do you actually care for how substantive a wagon is?

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:39 pm
by OkaPoka
i mean

go and throw down your vote i guess

then we continue dancing

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:40 pm
by chennisden
answer 1010.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:41 pm
by chennisden
ill throw my vote when you answer 1010.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:42 pm
by OkaPoka
i think you have no read on me

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:43 pm
by chennisden
nah

i have an unsureish scum read on you

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:43 pm
by chennisden
normally i would tunnel you for opportunistically using shadowlessclouds

but here its more towny because a no lynch is terrible.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:44 pm
by OkaPoka
where the vote at

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:45 pm
by chennisden
its coming.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:46 pm
by chennisden
actually oka i apologize for ever voting you in the first place.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:46 pm
by chennisden
VOTE: BrightEyedFish

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:47 pm
by RadiantCowbells
bad vote.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:47 pm
by OkaPoka
In post 655, chennisden wrote:he has
one
zero vote.

Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:47 pm
by chennisden
In post 220, BrightEyedFish wrote:VOTE: chennisden

I don't have any experience with chennisden and I don't want to jump on okas wagon, so I'm placing my vote there.

Feel free to sheep me unless you have reason to believe scum put the 8ball there. If so let us know.
In post 231, BrightEyedFish wrote:My Chen vote has nothing to do with a SR or activity. It just feels like a safe place to lynch. IMO, a mislynch > an 8ball lynch.
guys.