Mafiascum.net

In post 997, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 994, Performer wrote:I am part of the NRG so I understand how certain folks review. I have you as not town because of the super fishy claim along with having lucky/schadd/me as scum reads.

I'm warming up to the otter actually. And I'm also part of the NRG and I think that this argument is complete garbage, this seems like an incredibly faked angle shoot from you and easily dismissed.

HOLD UP

you are?! Who are you!? I find this very hard to believe as I don't recall any of our staff having alts.

In post 996, MaryJoLisa wrote:What's NRG?

We're the site's team that reviews and passes setups before they're ever run...including this setup being run by GIF.

I have alts

In post 1002, PenguinPower wrote:I have alts

This is news to me

In post 1000, Performer wrote:

In post 997, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 994, Performer wrote:I am part of the NRG so I understand how certain folks review. I have you as not town because of the super fishy claim along with having lucky/schadd/me as scum reads.

I'm warming up to the otter actually. And I'm also part of the NRG and I think that this argument is complete garbage, this seems like an incredibly faked angle shoot from you and easily dismissed.

HOLD UP

you are?! Who are you!? I find this very hard to believe as I don't recall any of our staff having alts.

If this is a lie, I swear to god...

I don't think schadd and redemption are scum together, but schadd/performer/NM seems fine, schadd/performer/MJL seems fine, schadd/performer/CDB seems fine.

If schadd somehow is town and just really, really obnoxious (hope not), then I'd probably sub redemption in for him with the same pairings.

In post 962, PenguinPower wrote:Who reviewed the setup and where are you seeing that? I don't see it in the first post.

Radiantcowbells & mastina.

In post 968, schadd_ wrote:

In post 687, schadd_ wrote:

Per the Former:

are you worried you'll get lynched / run up at some point this game?

yes I am but why would you ask me this weird question

Penguin, you said you don't necessarily believe my claim. Put that aside. Performer is arguing that the reviewers would try to force GIF to not have a UB. Do you think that is likely?

In post 1000, Performer wrote:

In post 997, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 994, Performer wrote:I am part of the NRG so I understand how certain folks review. I have you as not town because of the super fishy claim along with having lucky/schadd/me as scum reads.

I'm warming up to the otter actually. And I'm also part of the NRG and I think that this argument is complete garbage, this seems like an incredibly faked angle shoot from you and easily dismissed.

HOLD UP

you are?! Who are you!? I find this very hard to believe as I don't recall any of our staff having alts.

My expectation is that they'd all have alts if they want to play the game they work so hard to produce.

@pikachu I DONT BELIEVE YOUR CLAIM EITHER,

but I'm not going to go into why today . Anyway, I think I've made myself clear enough.

Now all of a sudden you say you're a part of our team, that schadd knows your alt, and you're keeping a tight lip on you're alt in the nrg ? If anything that sequence of events make me more suspicious.

I would think it more likely they would work to modify the setup to be conducive to a UB if he wanted one. Been awhile since I reviewed a game though.

Oh that was a total misquote.

In post 1003, Performer wrote:

In post 1002, PenguinPower wrote:I have alts

This is news to me

That's what I was trying to reply to.

even the reason of voting schadd for something about meming, is scummy (from pika)

In post 1010, PenguinPower wrote:I would think it more likely they would work to modify the setup to be conducive to a UB if he wanted one. Been awhile since I reviewed a game though.

Ok so why have you been ignoring Performer pushing this load of crappy fake angle-shooting at me? Now he wants to pretend he hasn't figured out who I am yet, his entire load of incredulity looks really fake

One of the problems that is helping scum is also that psyche/nm/cdb/luv haven't been easy to read.

So I want to see who the replacement will be for cdb (been over 6 days)

In post 1010, PenguinPower wrote:I would think it more likely they would work to modify the setup to be conducive to a UB if he wanted one. Been awhile since I reviewed a game though.

Is it safe for me to believe that no one playing this game could have reviewed it, even on an alt? Is that a stated policy with no loopholes for people to jump through?

In post 1012, Performer wrote:even the reason of voting schadd for something about meming, is scummy (from pika)

fake

In post 1015, MaryJoLisa wrote:

In post 1010, PenguinPower wrote:I would think it more likely they would work to modify the setup to be conducive to a UB if he wanted one. Been awhile since I reviewed a game though.

Is it safe for me to believe that no one playing this game could have reviewed it, even on an alt? Is that a stated policy with no loopholes for people to jump through?

That is correct.

Why are you not voting Performer yet?

In post 1014, Performer wrote:One of the problems that is helping scum is also that psyche/nm/cdb/luv haven't been easy to read.

So I want to see who the replacement will be for cdb (been over 6 days)

after fake certainty comes the desire to stall

In post 1013, Detective Pikachu wrote:

In post 1010, PenguinPower wrote:I would think it more likely they would work to modify the setup to be conducive to a UB if he wanted one. Been awhile since I reviewed a game though.

Ok so why have you been ignoring Performer pushing this load of crappy fake angle-shooting at me? Now he wants to pretend he hasn't figured out who I am yet, his entire load of incredulity looks really fake

I'm not even voting you anymore, and the continued ignoring of my question is so real that it hurts.

I'm not telling the whole list my main if that's what you're waiting for

Something is starting to make me think that you're something_smart

Also, mastina and RC would allow a UB any day of the week if it was important to GiF's idea for the setup, so your whole line of reasoning is off the rails and fake. There is no reason to think mastina or RC would deny GiF a UB if he wanted one.

Pika, that's not the thing I'm getting at. Obviously ub is allowable by itself in a setup. the balancing issues make that entirely a different matter

If pika somehow does flip green, looking at the vc and what's transpired itt - I would need to reevaluate nm/schadd/mary/cdb .