Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:19 am
So you also read Naerys' behavior and it suddenly didn't appear as genuine as you first thought?
*options.In post 999, NorwegianboyEE wrote:opinions.
*options.In post 999, NorwegianboyEE wrote:opinions.
Because of possible association with Map Wolf who looked really scummy, also may i add that you scumread Naery's pretty much the whole game until i "convinced" you otherwise at some point.In post 1000, Ph0enix wrote:So you also read Naerys' behavior and it suddenly didn't appear as genuine as you first thought?
Given how cocky you are, do you really have a preference? Wouldn't you be able to "easily sway" who you have to to vote who you want?In post 999, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Because i would have waited until either one of you had claimed and then gauged my opinions. Because scum or town, anyone could figure out that there would be exactly 1 town, 1 mason and one scum. So if scum waits they can choose and pick who they'd go against.
Referring to which part of the game in particular?In post 1002, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Because of possible association with Map Wolf who looked really scummy, also may i add that you scumread Naery's pretty much the whole game until i "convinced" you otherwise at some point.In post 1000, Ph0enix wrote:So you also read Naerys' behavior and it suddenly didn't appear as genuine as you first thought?
In post 1000, Ph0enix wrote:So you also read Naerys' behavior and it suddenly didn't appear as genuine as you first thought?
You're not exactly a saint either regarding Naerys. Why are you pushing this angle?In post 734, Ph0enix wrote:True.In post 725, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Naery's i don't like how you were completely ok with voting Saladman but now you're stalling.
How is that convincing me otherwise? I already scumread her at that point.In post 1005, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1000, Ph0enix wrote:So you also read Naerys' behavior and it suddenly didn't appear as genuine as you first thought?You're not exactly a saint either regarding Naerys. Why are you pushing this angle?In post 734, Ph0enix wrote:True.In post 725, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Naery's i don't like how you were completely ok with voting Saladman but now you're stalling.
The part where Naery's refused to vote Map Wolf. And the other thing that part where everyone asked me why i TR Naerys.In post 1004, Ph0enix wrote:Referring to which part of the game in particular?In post 1002, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Because of possible association with Map Wolf who looked really scummy, also may i add that you scumread Naery's pretty much the whole game until i "convinced" you otherwise at some point.In post 1000, Ph0enix wrote:So you also read Naerys' behavior and it suddenly didn't appear as genuine as you first thought?
So in which part do you convince me otherwise, as you say in the post above?In post 1008, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The part where Naery's refused to vote Map Wolf. And the other thing that part where everyone asked me why i TR Naerys.In post 1004, Ph0enix wrote:Referring to which part of the game in particular?In post 1002, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Because of possible association with Map Wolf who looked really scummy, also may i add that you scumread Naery's pretty much the whole game until i "convinced" you otherwise at some point.In post 1000, Ph0enix wrote:So you also read Naerys' behavior and it suddenly didn't appear as genuine as you first thought?
Can you hammer already, what's the point in me arguing all day with scum!Phoenix. I already know he's going to misrepresent, nitpick or deny every point i have against him.
If I have something about your points that I don't agree with, of course I'm going to say something, what?In post 1010, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Can you hammer already, what's the point in me arguing all day with scum!Phoenix. I already know he's going to misrepresent, nitpick or deny every point i have against him.
Oh so now you're playing that card? Now that none of the other stuff worked.In post 1012, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just look at Jackson's ISO and decide for yourself how bad his slot was until Ph0enix did some damage control.
So scum!you would genuinely give up if i had a super strong argument? Or would you fight it.In post 1013, Ph0enix wrote:If I have something about your points that I don't agree with, of course I'm going to say something, what?In post 1010, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Can you hammer already, what's the point in me arguing all day with scum!Phoenix. I already know he's going to misrepresent, nitpick or deny every point i have against him.
Yeah i don't know how you convinced me into it.In post 1015, Ph0enix wrote:You're pretty talkative for someone who stated he doesn't want to talk to me 2 hours prior.
I have one other game on this site and I have examples to show why that's not a valid argument to make in order to convince someone to not vote you.In post 1012, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just look at Jackson's ISO and decide for yourself how bad his slot was until Ph0enix did some damage control.
Misrep^In post 1014, Ph0enix wrote:Oh so now you're playing that card? Now that none of the other stuff worked.In post 1012, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just look at Jackson's ISO and decide for yourself how bad his slot was until Ph0enix did some damage control.
?In post 1020, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Misrep^In post 1014, Ph0enix wrote:Oh so now you're playing that card? Now that none of the other stuff worked.In post 1012, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just look at Jackson's ISO and decide for yourself how bad his slot was until Ph0enix did some damage control.
Innate charisma, what can I say.In post 1018, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Yeah i don't know how you convinced me into it.In post 1015, Ph0enix wrote:You're pretty talkative for someone who stated he doesn't want to talk to me 2 hours prior.
Do you think your other arguments were valid or what?In post 1021, Ph0enix wrote:?In post 1020, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Misrep^In post 1014, Ph0enix wrote:Oh so now you're playing that card? Now that none of the other stuff worked.In post 1012, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just look at Jackson's ISO and decide for yourself how bad his slot was until Ph0enix did some damage control.
Yes? What arguments are not valid?In post 1023, Ph0enix wrote:Do you think your other arguments were valid or what?In post 1021, Ph0enix wrote:?In post 1020, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Misrep^In post 1014, Ph0enix wrote:Oh so now you're playing that card? Now that none of the other stuff worked.In post 1012, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Just look at Jackson's ISO and decide for yourself how bad his slot was until Ph0enix did some damage control.