Mafiascum.net

In post 996, xRECKONERx wrote:i felt like revelations had more to chew on i guess. this just feels like empty calories because pooky dumbfucked the whole game into this aggressively stupid challenge

even if there's scum in these pairings, like, we had no time to learn anything. no time for analysis on anybody threatening challenges or whatever. it's just "here are the four options, go"

so i have no motivation to try to read anybody else right now. and considering that 4/4 of the highest spamposters in the game are in the possible yeetpool today, like, i really don't care all that much about who goes because i'm going to aggressively protect my sanity by not forcing myself to read any of your ISOs or posts in detail tbh. i mean im reading ... most of yours VPB but that's an old school professional courtesy.

p.edit: fuck if i know

In post 1001, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 996, xRECKONERx wrote:i felt like revelations had more to chew on i guess. this just feels like empty calories because pooky dumbfucked the whole game into this aggressively stupid challenge

even if there's scum in these pairings, like, we had no time to learn anything. no time for analysis on anybody threatening challenges or whatever. it's just "here are the four options, go"

so i have no motivation to try to read anybody else right now. and considering that 4/4 of the highest spamposters in the game are in the possible yeetpool today, like, i really don't care all that much about who goes because i'm going to aggressively protect my sanity by not forcing myself to read any of your ISOs or posts in detail tbh. i mean im reading ... most of yours VPB but that's an old school professional courtesy.

p.edit: fuck if i know

this is mad scummy

tho that could also be because he's reck

lulz

In post 993, xRECKONERx wrote:what you need to understand is that meta is garbage and every game i play i treat like a brand new wonderful experience with no preconceived notions about anything or anybody.

In post 1003, AGar wrote:Shamless prod dodge. Will get caught up tonight (hopefully) or tomorrow AM. Apologies for my relative absence since Thursday night.

For now, have an explanation in the form of a picture:

Spoiler:

In post 1007, Noraa wrote:Pooky's really dodgy when I ask him to vote me :O

but he also says I'm scummy ...

If people want to make this happen,
I will support,

VOTE: Pooky

In post 1012, Gamma Emerald wrote:Something about 965 hits different. Is it refusing to give actual opinions on VP/Pooky (especially VP given she claims to have him sorted now) because I’m “being a bully” by requesting a read in the timeframe where it holds the most weight, and then going and agreeing with transparency being a good way to be trusted?
Nah, gotta be something else, can’t be that.

I obviously can’t enforce any ultimatum here, I’m just trying to say that your read on Pooky+VP matters less when the challenge ands and they’re not on the table as immediate lim options. I don’t know why you’re so pissed off, I’m sorry your workplace sucks apparently, but the apparent effort from you seemed to have been directed at a half-assed solve that only really promoted easy targets.

In post 966, Starbuck wrote:

In post 743, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 739, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 712, VP Baltar wrote:I agree on notsci being scum most likely. I don't agree so much on cakez

why?

Notsci seems to be cruising for path of least resistance yeet today. Remember when I said scum would use Pooky's insta-challenge as a way to take no responsibility for their actions today? Notsci is like the epitomy of that. He said he's willing to hammer anyone. I also feel like he's not trying to solve. I don't have a case at the moment because I tend to just keep impressions of each player in my head, and then later if I feel super strongly someone is scum, I'll re-iso them to see if their posting matches up with the impression I have or not. More often than not, I get bad feelings about someone for a good reason.

And that's leaving off how he felt you were "exploiting" Noraa's naivete. Basically, blaming you for "tricking" her or some such. I'm not quite sure if his quick turn around to my call out of that is genuine, but time will tell. He could have been a lot more defensive towards me with his response and he wasn't. So that's something.

In post 1014, xRECKONERx wrote:why are you expending so much energy on starbuck when she's not even on the table for today

In post 486, notscience wrote:@UT- Noraa and VP reads are based off their handling of the hood. I think Noraa is being Naive and it’s being exploited by VP.

In post 967, Starbuck wrote:Why? If he has a weak read, he's going to work to sort VPB and the conclusion might be opposite of his initial feelings due to the evolution of his read. It's literally what anyone should do on Day 1. Everyone works through their sorting differently and it seems like you're just mad because he didn't do it your way.

In post 1018, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay. So someone wanna tell me why I’VE caught a ration of shit for thinking like that while that’s gone unanswered for? I don’t think “notscience can’t be limmed today” is a valid excuse rn

In post 999, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:reck is probly scum lol

In post 1020, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 1018, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay. So someone wanna tell me why I’VE caught a ration of shit for thinking like that while that’s gone unanswered for? I don’t think “notscience can’t be limmed today” is a valid excuse rn

I think starbuck and I have both said it's a bad mentality.

I've said notscience is likely scum (not really for that though.) I don't think there's really a disparity in how I've looked at either of your slots.

In post 1016, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1014, xRECKONERx wrote:why are you expending so much energy on starbuck when she's not even on the table for today

I don’t wanna go full “ok boomer” but damn do y’all have no long-term game sense rn