is that what you think?In post 7848, midwaybear wrote:Imagine if this is TvT
-b
In post 6297, Annie Edison wrote:I’m not saying it doesn’t. But I know I’m opening Pandora’s box with this.
I feel like I've been trying to maintain the structural integrity of a very muddy dike regarding Cabd's read of you, ever since mid-ish Day 2. And sometimes my certainty erodes.In post 6304, Annie Edison wrote:Hi ffery!
Now I understand part of the bell readflip are the crumbs from the doctor that never happened. Other than the aforementioned ate and sowing discord is there something else I’m missing?
Because I really had a lot of concern for the timing of cabds readflip on me and then going “well sucks it came up now when we can’t talk about it” when he was the one who brought it up lol
prevailing reason as of 7300 you thought he was scum i guess would be nice springboardIn post 7852, skitter30 wrote:bork sure, but i'm gonna sign off shortly. what do you want to talk abt ?
yeahIn post 7855, skitter30 wrote:eh actually very shortly but if you wanna pick it up tomorrow i'm happy to do that
yeahIn post 7855, skitter30 wrote:eh actually very shortly but if you wanna pick it up tomorrow i'm happy to do that
Once upon a time I was easy to snow.In post 7852, skitter30 wrote:ffery i'm like reasonably confident you have said to me recently that cabd would relish the challenge to try to snow you. i have no idea how he relates to imperium etc but this is my impression of him
bork sure, but i'm gonna sign off shortly. what do you want to talk abt ?
what as of 6600 did you not like about his iso in the other thread?In post 7853, petapan wrote:i was the one who was most strongly scumreading spiffeh and i got into it with him some dozens of pages back or whatever it was, i've made a few posts about it if you'd like me to quote. i'm not sure skitter's arguments were as strong aside from him just not being towny here
I saw this and thought I'd posted in the wrong thread!In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=12488555#p12488555]post 7859[/url], Annie Edison wrote:Well I’ve been the pretty consistent wagon today. I think this is a do or die time to get me sorted before we get there? I think we both know I’m making it to tomorrow even if I flip.In post 7854, Deacon Blues wrote:I feel like I've been trying to maintain the structural integrity of a very muddy dike regarding Cabd's read of you, ever since mid-ish Day 2. And sometimes my certainty erodes.
I can't maintain my read of you and that sucks. :/
I'm not looking forward to it if I survive to be in the same thread with you.
wouldn't actively seek it out if he had other avenues i guess is my argument; if he got put in that position then sure, game onIn post 7864, skitter30 wrote:you're currently making the argument that he wouldn't even try
Oh he would absolutely try if he were scum and he might very well succeed.In post 7864, skitter30 wrote:ffery i'm p sure you told me this like recently ... ?
and that he'd want to snow you?
putting aside the issue of whehter or not *he can*, you're currently making the argument that he wouldn't even try, but i'm under the impression from you + other people in said cohor that he would definitely enjoy the challenge and would wnat to make the attempt
ok really bouncing now, g'night
which?In post 7866, petapan wrote:in particular i felt the reads he threw out were just implausible and didn't reflect critical thinking
small w weakIn post 6306, Annie Edison wrote:I suppose curiosity and cats apply here. But I was wondering because that made me wonder why not swap a weak modifier role that could actually get stuff done than superb? Plus it’s massclaim anyways? So why does it matter I want more elaboration?
because you don't agree w/ them or because they don't make sense together or whatIn post 7873, petapan wrote:but i still dont see how someone looks at the game and thinks all those people can be town and the scumteam is in that group
Do you understand why that query caused extreme concern?In post 6306, Annie Edison wrote:About the weak thing?
I suppose curiosity and cats apply here. But I was wondering because that made me wonder why not swap a weak modifier role that could actually get stuff done than superb? Plus it’s massclaim anyways? So why does it matter I want more elaboration?
i just called it confbiasy because you're using his entire body of work as data points to fit a conclusion; i don't think you need to get hung up on the semantics i used thereIn post 7899, petapan wrote:is it confbiasy if i'm just literally referencing everything he said on shelly? it's fine to disagree if you like and say you don't think it's a bad trajectory but i'm just pointing things out and making a conclusion
just noting that i see this and am thinking it over but like, i can totally see somebody scumreading a50 this game over the entire game i guess.In post 7902, petapan wrote:he wouldn't, but he's still on that read days later w/ no readjustment, he was talking about the thread needing to refocus but then has reads that feel, well,i wouldn't say consensus-y, but not very conflicting?In post 7897, Deacon Blues wrote:7354 how would spiffeh have known a50 was a tracker when he made the post you quoted?
-b
We're voting skitter and a50In post 7934, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:which of those 3 do you want btwIn post 7932, Deacon Blues wrote:Literal wine club. 2017 Old Vine Zin.
In post 7979, borkjerfkin wrote:You are straining my creduiltyIn post 7973, petapan wrote:it's quite possibly both of themIn post 7968, skitter30 wrote:dunn, i have run out of fucks to give, so i don't really care.In post 6334, Dunnstral wrote:Skitter your purple room stuff and talking about Dandelion Wine's role stuff both look really scummy
either there's scum in dandelion/deacon, or the pair is functionally acting like the 7th and 8th members of the scumteam given how the game has unfolded to this point. this is unpopular take, but true.
if there's scum it's dandelion because the role is literally a scum role
-b
This shit is really getting old to hear. You're acting like im just shitting the game up or just blatantly not trying or something and thats kinda fucking crap.In post 7968, skitter30 wrote:either there's scum in dandelion/deacon, or the pair is functionally acting like the 7th and 8th members of the scumteam given how the game has unfolded to this point.
I mean, yeah, ok: we disagree on a read. I get it.In post 7982, skitter30 wrote:Tbf i actually dont have much of an issue with *your* play in particular. The confluence of how your slot has interacted with cabd's is the problem
And i also feel like i've tried shaking you (collectively) out of it a whole bunch but here we are so that clearly hasnt worked
Lol, who's lobbying? LLD might be.In post 7985, petapan wrote:so yeah i changed my mind you can lobby for support from someone else
In post 7880, borkjerfkin wrote:ok. i think the point about all the investigatives being a team together being pretty obviously silly is a pretty good point.In post 7876, petapan wrote:i don't think the way things have been going and the kills reflect that. his scumteam guess also included every non-skitter investigative. but in general i feel as though he's been surface level with his takes, like that midwaybear driveby he just did. (midwaybear is maybe in the iffy range in that i think he could totally post like he's been doing today as scum, but on tone still town i think). i don't like the stickiness of his a50 read, i feel that's a lazy lurker elim scum would want to push, and some of his reasoning on that dishonest. i had words about it earlier.
let me mull this over a bit more but i like this take at first glance
-b
In post 7886, borkjerfkin wrote:the thing is, like,In post 7876, petapan wrote:aren't trying to sort just push eliminations on easy targetsnobody'sbreaking through the mist here; we've got a loose status quo, we've got some lurkfucks, fluffing, and when i challenge people to find the "true legit deepwolfs" that they claim are there or whatever i don't feel like i'm getting a whole lot of stuff i can empathize with so i have to switch my own worldview to find ports in the storm i can rely on and man is that fucking hard this game
-b
In post 7888, borkjerfkin wrote:i gotta say just fucking ignoring forward thread has been really helpful, just to hone conversation and i think we should keep doing that for the moment at least.
-b
is vs was.In post 7957, Almost50 wrote:Would you have been trying to be ON the radar if you were a Tracker??In post 7938, Deacon Blues wrote:really, I feel like a50 is under the radar?
That's why I threw a vote down
we're scum if we vote you and scum if we don't?In post 7973, petapan wrote:it's quite possibly both of themIn post 7968, skitter30 wrote:dunn, i have run out of fucks to give, so i don't really care.In post 6334, Dunnstral wrote:Skitter your purple room stuff and talking about Dandelion Wine's role stuff both look really scummy
either there's scum in dandelion/deacon, or the pair is functionally acting like the 7th and 8th members of the scumteam given how the game has unfolded to this point. this is unpopular take, but true.
if there's scum it's dandelion because the role is literally a scum role
Not what I said or meant. If he saved either of our slots he went directly against what we suggested, by intent or by not reading.In post 7993, Dandelion Wine wrote:I agree that such an agreement is basically meaningless and probably won't be adhered to, but people do it all the damn time. It annoys me, but this is hardly a new idea or a scummy one.In post 7965, skitter30 wrote:this is functionally meaningless wrt you having any stake in this bet, because you're going to ultimately back out of this as either alignment. which makes this stupidly performative and manipulative because it looks decent and real at first glance, but if anybody thinks abt this for more than two seconds it should be apparent that she won't (and can't) actually follow up on this, even if she's townIn post 7921, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:and the first time one of them flips town, I'll vote myself and we can kill me.
also aside, i just wanna call out that i think the narrative that you and cabd have pushed that gamma died protecting you is unlikely bordering on ridiculous in the gamestate at eod yesterday (long sidebar showing that i'm p damn accurate making these sorts of assessments that i'm sure nobody cares abt reading, blah blah blah)
pedit peta it literally loses the game if she's town and wrong. hence stupidly performative and manipulative ...
LLD has said she thinks gamma might have died protecting her but also actively stated she doesn't really expect anyone to agree or care about this, and i think deacon was the one who suggested he might have saved deacon or us?
-ceph
does this mean you'll talk with me about how you came by your skitter read or no?In post 6365, Bell wrote:@deacon, okay.
yes, I'd like!In post 6366, Bell wrote:I could give you the whole history from beginning to end if you’d like.
I agree something feels deeply wrong. Day 2 was all about compromises, in some ways, at least for us, and that's not how I want this day to play out.In post 8007, petapan wrote:i didn't full-on switch to scumreading you (i'd be voting you if i were), iIn post 8003, Deacon Blues wrote:Yesterday was a bad day all around for me. I've had you settled in my mind as town for a long while. Your flip on us gave bork a case of ffery-hives. That's not where my head is currently at, but I couldn't figure out why you're scumreading us and dandelion both now.entertained the possibilitybecause it feels like something is deeply wrong and at some point i start to wonder whether someone is blinkered or actively looking to mislead me, and i'm beginning to feel issues with the way some things have been asserted. i look at other people and i start to worry more. i grew uncomfortable with the idea of a skitter vote. i might be able to rant on it later
I'm trying to parse this. Does this mean you can see her as scum with one or more of LLD, Dandelion or us, or that you can't see her as scum with anyone else either?In post 8047, petapan wrote:so really i don't blame LLD for calling me scum with skitter because if you look outside LLD/DB/DW, i'm one of the only people who makes much sense as her teammate
I don't have an answer to your concern. I'm trying to work through this game the way I almost always do. townread/poe.In post 8057, petapan wrote:that doesn't answer me in any satisfactory way whatsoeverIn post 8055, Deacon Blues wrote:Bottom line, I'm not voting Dandelion or LLD today.
Spiffeh's play this game prior to turnstiling looked like his town play in recent games, especially day 1. Today kinda feels like a stripped down, snarkier version of his early play in the other thread. If he's town I feel bad about dragging him over here. I've scanned the pooky vs FL scum game and didn't come away with much in the way of points of parallel. I'm meh about whether he's the kind of player where meta is actually that useful, though. Maybe someone could convince me he's scum with a great argument.
I go back and forth on FB but his interactions with skitter feel to me like he's town.
I'm basically trusting bork (and you since you agree with bork) on mwb.
My unvotes are on A50 and Skitter.
Fix your algorithm, then.In post 8066, Almost50 wrote:I have no idea. I just had him down as a Forwards Cop eversinceIn post 8064, Deacon Blues wrote:Did FB make another role claim and I missed it? He retracted his day 1 claim.
I wish there were an appropriate punctuation mark to put behind "yeah" to this. I'm not trying to convince you I'm right and I'm not trying to get you to vote with me.In post 8067, petapan wrote:okay but i gave anti-alignment reads for skitter on 3 of the other 8 people who started in this thread, take me out, and do you see why i start to get concerned? i do not mind if you think the reasons for seeing people as unpaired is notIn post 8062, Deacon Blues wrote:I don't have an answer to your concern. I'm trying to work through this game the way I almost always do. townread/poe.
I don't know who skitter is scum with if she's scum. Is she WKing town-A50? Is she WKing scum-A50?
If we were in the same timeline with Bell, that's who I'd probably be voting, unless somehow a lot more direct interaction changed my mind about him.validbut if i am looking at someone and having a hard time seeing potential partners i'm not going to want to vote them. you should recognize me having used this reasoning before.
I think part of the core of all this is how and why his read of you differs from mine. Not THAT my read differs, but WHY it differs, if that makes sense.In post 8072, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Can I ask why you think that reasoning that amounts to essentially doing pre-flip associatives from a player who apparently gets "super paranoid and uncertain" in endgame/lategame makes any sense as a reasoning we should be nodding along with?In post 8070, Deacon Blues wrote:I wish there were an appropriate punctuation mark to put behind "yeah" to this. I'm not trying to convince you I'm right and I'm not trying to get you to vote with me.In post 8067, petapan wrote:okay but i gave anti-alignment reads for skitter on 3 of the other 8 people who started in this thread, take me out, and do you see why i start to get concerned? i do not mind if you think the reasons for seeing people as unpaired is notIn post 8062, Deacon Blues wrote:I don't have an answer to your concern. I'm trying to work through this game the way I almost always do. townread/poe.
I don't know who skitter is scum with if she's scum. Is she WKing town-A50? Is she WKing scum-A50?
If we were in the same timeline with Bell, that's who I'd probably be voting, unless somehow a lot more direct interaction changed my mind about him.validbut if i am looking at someone and having a hard time seeing potential partners i'm not going to want to vote them. you should recognize me having used this reasoning before.
I think your stance on this makes internal sense, and maybe external sense as well.
and you are one of my townreads where I feel like I can actually get something useful in terms of improving my own reads by interacting with you.
that's where you stand with me. I didn't include you in the "not voting today" list because I'm talking to you about other players, but that's where you are.
yeah internal consistency, but getting harder and harder to follow because our world views are diverging.In post 8076, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So bad but consistently applied by him as town, is what you are saying?In post 8075, Deacon Blues wrote:I think part of the core of all this is how and why his read of you differs from mine. Not THAT my read differs, but WHY it differs, if that makes sense.In post 8072, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Can I ask why you think that reasoning that amounts to essentially doing pre-flip associatives from a player who apparently gets "super paranoid and uncertain" in endgame/lategame makes any sense as a reasoning we should be nodding along with?In post 8070, Deacon Blues wrote:I wish there were an appropriate punctuation mark to put behind "yeah" to this. I'm not trying to convince you I'm right and I'm not trying to get you to vote with me.In post 8067, petapan wrote:okay but i gave anti-alignment reads for skitter on 3 of the other 8 people who started in this thread, take me out, and do you see why i start to get concerned? i do not mind if you think the reasons for seeing people as unpaired is notIn post 8062, Deacon Blues wrote:I don't have an answer to your concern. I'm trying to work through this game the way I almost always do. townread/poe.
I don't know who skitter is scum with if she's scum. Is she WKing town-A50? Is she WKing scum-A50?
If we were in the same timeline with Bell, that's who I'd probably be voting, unless somehow a lot more direct interaction changed my mind about him.validbut if i am looking at someone and having a hard time seeing potential partners i'm not going to want to vote them. you should recognize me having used this reasoning before.
I think your stance on this makes internal sense, and maybe external sense as well.
and you are one of my townreads where I feel like I can actually get something useful in terms of improving my own reads by interacting with you.
that's where you stand with me. I didn't include you in the "not voting today" list because I'm talking to you about other players, but that's where you are.
llike internal consistency?
I still hate everything about how day 1 went down after pooky showed up especially given how he'd been playing in the forwards thread prior. It was so frustrating even getting posts through during that hour and there's some residual pissed-offness about it.In post 8082, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:okay so talk to me about Pooky then. You think they're scum?In post 8081, Deacon Blues wrote:yeah internal consistency, but getting harder and harder to follow because our world views are diverging.In post 8076, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So bad but consistently applied by him as town, is what you are saying?In post 8075, Deacon Blues wrote:I think part of the core of all this is how and why his read of you differs from mine. Not THAT my read differs, but WHY it differs, if that makes sense.In post 8072, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Can I ask why you think that reasoning that amounts to essentially doing pre-flip associatives from a player who apparently gets "super paranoid and uncertain" in endgame/lategame makes any sense as a reasoning we should be nodding along with?In post 8070, Deacon Blues wrote:I wish there were an appropriate punctuation mark to put behind "yeah" to this. I'm not trying to convince you I'm right and I'm not trying to get you to vote with me.In post 8067, petapan wrote:okay but i gave anti-alignment reads for skitter on 3 of the other 8 people who started in this thread, take me out, and do you see why i start to get concerned? i do not mind if you think the reasons for seeing people as unpaired is notIn post 8062, Deacon Blues wrote:I don't have an answer to your concern. I'm trying to work through this game the way I almost always do. townread/poe.
I don't know who skitter is scum with if she's scum. Is she WKing town-A50? Is she WKing scum-A50?
If we were in the same timeline with Bell, that's who I'd probably be voting, unless somehow a lot more direct interaction changed my mind about him.validbut if i am looking at someone and having a hard time seeing potential partners i'm not going to want to vote them. you should recognize me having used this reasoning before.
I think your stance on this makes internal sense, and maybe external sense as well.
and you are one of my townreads where I feel like I can actually get something useful in terms of improving my own reads by interacting with you.
that's where you stand with me. I didn't include you in the "not voting today" list because I'm talking to you about other players, but that's where you are.
llike internal consistency?
You became an axis that this game is pivoting on for me. That axis doesn't exist in his view of the gamestate.
I'm not explaining this very well.
One of my problems with having you as an axis is my pooky read.
I think it looks like I'm the only one who thinks they are town. I'm willing to admit I might be wrong, but I feel reaaaallllllly strongly about that townread. Same way I'm willing to risk my life about skitter scum, you know?
She'd be in the same thread with her arch scumread(s) and in the timestream where if she IS a town watcher, she could use the ability tonight if she gets more traction there than she has here.In post 8087, Firebringer wrote:we can only do that if one would move over. would skitter even agree knowing she would get yeeted doing so? i don't think so
You're replying to the waffling one.In post 8112, skitter30 wrote:no offense but you're ridiculously tunneledIn post 8062, Deacon Blues wrote:I don't know who skitter is scum with if she's scum. Is she WKing town-A50? Is she WKing scum-A50?
In post 8112, skitter30 wrote:no offense but you're ridiculously tunneledIn post 8062, Deacon Blues wrote:I don't know who skitter is scum with. Is she WKing town-A50? Is she WKing scum-A50?if she's scum
It's certainly not a tunnel.In post 8126, skitter30 wrote:that's supposed to be understood as a waffle?
this is such a cheap shot.In post 8184, petapan wrote:remember when cabd was promising an epic dunk on skitter yesterday and then ghosted and now their bigtime townread just turnstiled skitter out of the thread apparently