Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:57 pm
I mean, yeah. That's what happens when you lim the last scum lolIn post 999, T3 wrote:margot has such extreme conviction bc sheknows if she lims me she wins
I mean, yeah. That's what happens when you lim the last scum lolIn post 999, T3 wrote:margot has such extreme conviction bc sheknows if she lims me she wins
Margot's Ate does seem towny thoIn post 995, Roden wrote:I'm leaning towards Margot at this point since T3's ISO does add up with his explained thought process. He's also been gradually mistrusting of me which feels natural.
I wanted to vote Margot yesterday because of N1 scum actions not adding up for anyone but her and I'm still pretty sure I'm right about that. The only thing that gives me pause is that T3 could've chosen to no-kill N1, but I'm fairly certain he never directly targets the Tracker N1 because his plan relied on the chance of there being a Doc regardless of his alignment.
Just remember, when we lose, that we lost because you thought it was more likely that I spent most of d1 aggressively bussing the scum power role than T3 decided to no kill on n1, despite the fact that it makes the game last no more days than it does currently (as proved by current game state. It would be the same ELO situation, just with 3 players rather than 4).In post 1003, Roden wrote:VOTE: Margot
I think this is just it. I really don't wanna lose because we didn't follow the logic that pointed to her just because of AtE. Unless your analysis brings up something damning about T3, I don't want to change my vote. I've reread the game so many times now and I just don't see what other info we could possibly analyze. I've asked all the questions I can think of and there's just nothing left to discuss at this point.
I'm really sorry if it isn't you Margot, I just think T3's most likely town here.
ok ithink ur town. if ur scum u deserve to winIn post 1010, Roden wrote:I really need Grandpa to start posting, I'm starting to doubt myself and we're already halfway to deadline.
In post 607, T3 wrote:okay wow
Hopefully he's VT or maf.
If LQ is something stupid like cop then this will be one of my top 3 mafia fals, along with the fake slip in NQN and the macho 2-shot cop.
the problem is that t3 townread lq while hammering
smh imagine not being in like 4 gamesIn post 1005, Roden wrote:I do think it's possible T3 is scum, but his thought process here is similar to what I've seen in his past town games. Grandpa ultimately has the final word though since he's the only one that can hammer. If he thinks it's T3 I'm completely open to hearing his case, since I'm never gonna live this down if we fuck up at the end after such a strong D1.
This is my only active game atm so it's got my full attention.
i think margot is most likely to flip town more than t3.In post 852, MargotRosa wrote:I do remember thinking it was a bit odd that everyone took the claim at face value, when it kinda seemed like it wasn't even a serious claim to begin with. IdkIn post 851, GrandpaMo wrote:That claim looks so fake by the way now looking back at it. I know hockeyfan personally, he fakeclaims A LOT.In post 846, Roden wrote:Anyway.In post 151, HockeyFan wrote:Ok fine I'll just claim so we can get T3/Roden to play the game!! I am tracker, im gonna go for the night so i will probs re read game tmr afternoon or smh after work
can u explain that process/In post 1005, Roden wrote:I do think it's possible T3 is scum, but his thought process here is similar to what I've seen in his past town games. Grandpa ultimately has the final word though since he's the only one that can hammer. If he thinks it's T3 I'm completely open to hearing his case, since I'm never gonna live this down if we fuck up at the end after such a strong D1.
This is my only active game atm so it's got my full attention.
In post 975, Roden wrote:If anyone says Tracker should claim and then specifically mentions a Doc, it implies a Follow The Cop strat.
In post 976, Roden wrote:I've been saying this for awhile now? Why are you surprised now?
In post 978, Roden wrote:In post 22, T3 wrote:BTW if there is a tracker you should claim now.In post 41, T3 wrote:If there's no Tracker then we play normally. If there is a Tracker then if there's a Jailkweper they should Jail the Tracker. If there's a FN they should target the Tracker. If there's a Doctor they should protect the Tracker.In post 23, HockeyFan wrote:Why?
Once day 2 hapens we massclaim.
If Doctor/FN is run up to E-1 then just claim 'PR'.How is this not a Doc soft? Why would I not think you were Doc here?In post 44, T3 wrote:Mafias don't know if there's a FN or a Doctor.
In post 979, Roden wrote:In post 93, T3 wrote:Yep Roden is locktown.In post 79, Roden wrote:I can't answer this unfortunately.In post 78, HockeyFan wrote:Okay you saying this implies that youIn post 77, Roden wrote:I think you'll just see as the game goes on. I'm sensing a spicy T3 play and scum might not be happy starting Day 2.wanttracker to claim d1 f1? If thats true, what do u think the benefit actually is in claiming tracker d1 f1?
SOUL MASONSDid you think I knew you were using a strat from a completely different ongoing game?In post 133, T3 wrote:Roden knows exactly what is going on and he is locktown for that.In post 130, alstroemerial wrote:Okey dokey, here is where I am at.
I am getting strong town sense from Margot, contrary to what some others have said. It seems like she is really trying to sort -- some internal back and forth is good. I really liked 53 although I didn't check the math. It reads to me like a newbie who is really determined to put in the work.
Hockey is a town lean for me, though I disagree with the argument in 94 that withholding information isalwaysanti-town. If someone is trying to bait a trap or is an investigation role who doesn't want to share results until they have a guilty, etc, there are some cases where that's good to hold back. If T3 was trying to do a spicy town play, which is totally T3, then not spelling out the details is beneficial. But the way that he's making his argument reads town, even if I disagree with it. Although I just realized it could be scum trying to get info on what the play is. Still not enough to change my read though.
T3 is probably town for the exact reason that Hockey outlined -- it's a huge gambit for scum to do right out the gate, so it seems unlikely.
Roden is null. 77 struck me as weird as well, but I don't see why scum would town lock T3 after that risky play. Then again, he then went on to walk back that town lock in 91.
Clasko and Egix are null.
The Astra slot is a sliiiiight scum lean because even with so few posts and the swift replace out, it seemed like she might have been jumping on the LQ wagon, and her RVS vote was also a wagon.
LQ -- I get a bad sense from 125. It reads a bit like complaining about getting scumread with a liiitle smidgeon of omgus, especially considering they imply that T3's gambit isn't scummy in 57 before bringing in a little more setup speculation.
The main thing that gives me pause is the very fact that LQ is a wagon already. It could be a quick and easy miselim. I also have no interest in pushing anyone to E-1 right now, so I'll leave my vote on the Astra slot for now to put a little extra fire on whoever joins in.
In post 981, Roden wrote:In post 79, Roden wrote:I can't answer this unfortunately.In post 78, HockeyFan wrote:Okay you saying this implies that youIn post 77, Roden wrote:I think you'll just see as the game goes on. I'm sensing a spicy T3 play and scum might not be happy starting Day 2.wanttracker to claim d1 f1? If thats true, what do u think the benefit actually is in claiming tracker d1 f1?This is the earliest I directly mention power roles wrt T3. I don't know how I can make it clearer I thought you were Doc.In post 355, Roden wrote:In post 337, StrangeMatter wrote:I say Roden or you right now is my top two candidates for scum has to be you and the former is honestly better to flip than your slot. Roden elim. To me, getting some information involving the meta (of T3 and Roden) is probably more useful than eliminating you because of what some people here consider a slip.In post 333, Clasko wrote:Also wanna ask SM who their two strongest elimination candidates are rn for D1, and why?
I say two, because one is most likely me which you've hinted the potential reasons for in #279 and iterating that doesn't say much.Imagine threatening to vote a townie out because they refuse to out town power roles. This is such an overtly scummy thought process you might as well be scum claiming.In post 339, StrangeMatter wrote:Even if this flips green it means we still have some sort of information, so either way I think this vote is fine.
VOTE: Strange
In post 982, Roden wrote:How would I know about this strat though? I don't typically read ongoing games that I'm not a part of.
what happened to this @roden?In post 983, T3 wrote:I thought you were like "hmmmmmm yes where did t3 get this strat and he won't say why
*looks at ongoing game'*
ok must be town"
VOTE: margot
its quotes like this that make margot to be townIn post 155, MargotRosa wrote:Totally misunderstood what e-X rules were. Thought it meant that your vote would only count up to n-1 votes, which meant people couldn't hammer off your vote. I believe the only votes for LQ are Roden, T3 and myself, so I'll correctIn post 149, HockeyFan wrote:licketys at E-1 lol wtf? I think from Lickety's reactions to being put at e-1 is town+. They arent panicking like scum would nor are they doing damage control(ie giving some last min scumreads to distance from thier maf partner)
VOTE: LQ e-2
also this is funIn post 96, MargotRosa wrote:I think Roden and T3 could easily be playing mindgames here. Idk. Could go either way.