In post 639, MathBlade wrote:It’s not so much whether Mastina makes sense but if she has an overarching view or not.
In post 641, MathBlade wrote:Instead she has empty statements and doesn’t look at the game as a whole.
In post 672, MathBlade wrote:The gist is
Mastina is not looking at the overarching game and instead hyper focusing (see above for difference)
Her posts seem to be factually correct but overall meaningless (Eg town and scum exist in the game. Well duh)
The things that aren’t meaningless are skewed in a weird way (Eg the 52% is well within the standard deviation. If I do something as town or scum then by definition it’s NAI. Her *best* example of me being scum is NAI. That should tell you I am not scum)
Btw going through MathBlade's iso for a different reason and all of these posts in particular are disingenuous as fuck in various ways which prove MathBlade is scum.
640 gives an accurate link to what my scumgame is. Notice something in that game? There was genuinely no effort. I posted the absolute bare minimum and did fuckall of anything. TRUE fuckall of anything. Genuinely did nothing.
To say that game is anything REMOTELY like this game is egregious as fuck. This game is night/day to that one.
A lot of the disjointed nature of my posting can be attributed to the obvious: that I have had a fucking shitty week that is only getting worse and worse and that trying to present coherent thoughts is basically impossible. There is NO world where MathBlade as town doesn't realize a town-mastina with rl shit going on is going to be more "all over" the place. (Which btw is actually a towntell so MathBlade presenting it as a scumtell is itself MathBlade outright lying about my meta.)
My statements are not "factually correct but overall meaningless". The statements have meaning and purpose. All of them are describing WHY my reads are what they are and giving backing for them.
I have an overarching view and have been VERY clear about it all.
In post 264, mastina wrote:LOCKTOWN:
{Past Present Future, Save The Dragons, Dingle Dangle Scarecrow} (most locktown of locktown)
TOWN:
{Yume}
{Maid Cafe, MMR}
TOWNLEAN:
{furtiveglance}
{Enchant}
{T-Bone}
NULL:
{Child of Fairies}
{Radja}
ALSO SCUM BUT DIFFERENT:
{Bunnyonce, Radical Rat}
SCUM:
{Korina/MathBlade, Frozen Angel*, professotic}
Past Present Future is town because literally all three heads are in their town metas. Nancy in particular is the easiest player onsite to read and literally every player not townreading Nancy who has played with her before is automatically suspect for not seeing it because literally all of them should be agreeing with this townread of her.
Auro's stances are exactly the reasoned statements that I have come to know and expect from him as town. They are the casual, but analytical, reasonable, posts of a town player trying to game solve with decent logic and points.
Titus's absentmindedness while providing unusual takes and overall direction is basically town.
And then their hydra talk is transparently not fake and also strongly indicative that they are town. You can tell from the topics they are discussing that they are solving the game without any agenda, and it shows in their play.
Save the Dragons has a night and day town/scum meta where as scum he basically wallposts and is super duper serious while also callous. As town, however, he is basically a spamposter, casual, laid-back, low-pressure, jokey, but still solving.
Klick is playing exactly to his town meta, where he is posting good reads, good takes, with good logic and being active.
Yume's opening posts contained a towntell I don't want to disclose, but also she has since shown some of her more signature traits (ahhh, I'm not in a headspace where I can describe this in a way that isn't rude--the traits aren't bad but I don't have a way to word the traits which doesn't
sound
bad).
Maid Cafe I admit is basically just gut. (Tho that said they're not partnered with MathBlade and they're not partnered with Radical Rat, so if my reads on MB and RR are correct, town by proxy.)
MMR is showing towntells from all three heads. Their views are reasonable, but not too perfect. Flawed, but more good than not. And the dissonance isn't faked, yet is not dissonance pointing to a scum alignment. Their stances, their posts, all show the perspective of three town players who have some similar takes but haven't gotten 100% on the same page, in a way that is basically just town.
furtiveglance is not posting the way he did in Datisi's Maid Cafe, where he was a serial killer. His posting is entirely different tonality and content-wise. His approach is self-evidently different, with him being basically...doing entirely different things. This one I probably can explain better but I shouldn't need to because Datisi's Cafe should still be fresh in people's minds so it should be easy enough to see what he was like there and how he isn't that, here.
Enchant I'm like 75% (give or take 5%) sure this is his town meta.
T-Bone is mostly just gut. (With a side of I don't think his hop onto me was scum--just dumb.)
Child of Fairies has no posts so being null needs no explanation.
Radja I don't really like the content of, but not enough to be strongly scum. PoE is a good slot-in, probably, but not entirely sure.
Bunnyonce, Greeting's posts are
good
, but look exactly like what I would expect scum-Greeting to be doing this game: being reasonable and logical enough to not be seen as town, but being passive enough to not be town enough to get nightkilled. Playing in a way that is, so to speak: "safe". Not being too confrontational, not being too vocal, being reasonable but not front and center with it.
Aisa I have no familiarity with but I get the same vibe: playing safe. In multiball. Not too town, but not too scum. Deliberately not performing at the highest level, but also not deliberately putting in too little.
Radical Rat, this is a more recent read but I want a full post to explain this.
Korina, I explained why his post was a scumclaim: it didn't have the content of an RVS post, but was made without reading. If it had been an RVS post it'd have been town, or if it had been done after reading it'd have been town, but a reasonless vote without reading is why it was scum.
MathBlade I have devoted countless posts towards why he's scum and there's countless more to follow.
professotic has tictac not showing any of their town traits, while showing scum traits.
Professor is also playing to TSE's scumplay with their tone, phrasing, etc.
Both of them are posting reads and reasons that have the semblance of their towngame, but are lackluster compared to the real thing. Cheap imitations, made by having some genuine reads but knowing that they still have to fake things.
Frozen Angel I am pretty sure is in her scumgame. It has to do with her opening focus and what she was doing, her tone, her wording, etc. Her areas of thinking are key, and the points she is/isn't raising. This is something that I DO intend to explain--when I actually have done the work to bump that 90% up to 100%. FA is definitely in ONE meta.
{FA, professotic, MathBlade} have all protected each other and all to varying degrees have suspicion on {Radja, Bunnyonce, Radical Rat}.
{Bunnyonce, Radical Rat, Radja} have all given clear signs they're not scum with any of FA/professotic/MathBlade, but they all fit as scum with each other.
5/6 of them have shown suspicion on me that kicked off after my "approximately 6 scum" post--indicating that they thought I was scum, by having TMI.
These are as clear as views get. There's no ambiguity to be had. I've not wavered on the FA read like MathBlade has implied. My read there--scumread--has been quite consistent the entire time; implying otherwise is disingenuous as fuck.