Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:20 pm
eh the cobble mistake was my own fault
never seen a mod put game necessary content in the flavor text before
never seen a mod put game necessary content in the flavor text before
can we start talking you out of a scum!Icon read already?In post 10049, Miss Lane wrote:I hate that I felt like I played pretty darn well this game
but i was mechanically fucked upside down and backwards
You believe ML now? What is going on?!In post 10052, pisskop wrote:i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.
my gut would say that scumteam is panicking? fire was all but confed and theyre dropping like flies now.In post 10039, Cephrir wrote:FB was the scum kill... why?
If you don't believe ML, why are you pushing me together?In post 10053, Amrun wrote:You believe ML now? What is going on?!In post 10052, pisskop wrote:i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.
i think the reaction is genuine, and the flavor seems to be fairly in line.In post 10053, Amrun wrote:You believe ML now? What is going on?!In post 10052, pisskop wrote:i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.
EP confirmed to me last nightIn post 10045, Bingle wrote:^In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.
EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.
I NEED THIS INFORMATION IT'S IMPORTANTIn post 10057, gobbledygook wrote:EP confirmed to me last nightIn post 10045, Bingle wrote:^In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.
EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.
if you weren't scum, i would be open to itIn post 10051, Iconeum wrote:can we start talking you out of a scum!Icon read already?In post 10049, Miss Lane wrote:I hate that I felt like I played pretty darn well this game
but i was mechanically fucked upside down and backwards
In what wayIn post 10057, gobbledygook wrote:EP confirmed to me last nightIn post 10045, Bingle wrote:^In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.
EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.
Quite literally because we have bigger fish to fryIn post 10055, Iconeum wrote:If you don't believe ML, why are you pushing me together?In post 10053, Amrun wrote:You believe ML now? What is going on?!In post 10052, pisskop wrote:i think you did fine. Sometimes the best roles are those that are negative, because they force you to play differently.
Why aren't you pushing a GUILTY on a serial killer?
why are you so intent on this? the sk isnt our biggest problem rn, and were actively talking about right now.In post 10055, Iconeum wrote:Why aren't you pushing a GUILTY on a serial killer?
In post 10063, pisskop wrote:why are you so intent on this? the sk isnt our biggest problem rn, and were actively talking about right now.In post 10055, Iconeum wrote:Why aren't you pushing a GUILTY on a serial killer?
He is mod confirmed town to me unless he was also recruited the same nightIn post 10061, Amrun wrote:In what wayIn post 10057, gobbledygook wrote:EP confirmed to me last nightIn post 10045, Bingle wrote:^In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.
EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.
it looks pretty desperate imo.In post 10062, gobbledygook wrote: Quite literally because we have bigger fish to fry
Yeah that’s the point. It’s a scummy thing to do. Ergo, Iconeum is scummy and needs rope.In post 10069, pisskop wrote:it looks pretty desperate imo.In post 10062, gobbledygook wrote: Quite literally because we have bigger fish to fry
who's the bigger literal fish gobbles?
P: ZOR WAS SCUM. Scum directly benefits from an SK lynch. not a good look
In post 10070, Iconeum wrote:I redirected EP into Zor N3
It is day 5. You have one night action?In post 10070, Iconeum wrote:I redirected EP into Zor N3
So we have 2 friendly neighbors? :/In post 10068, gobbledygook wrote:He is mod confirmed town to me unless he was also recruited the same nightIn post 10061, Amrun wrote:In what wayIn post 10057, gobbledygook wrote:EP confirmed to me last nightIn post 10045, Bingle wrote:^In post 10026, pisskop wrote:Im kind of for leashing an sk, if only to not waste a lynch on what ml is claiming. and the extra town-driven kill is nice
Also, lynching elements means we have to then lynch ml, which is two cult recruits without a lynch between them.
EP claimed to be confirmable, btw, resolve that today.