Mini 878: Nouns Mafia - Da game is ovah!


Forum rules
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1025 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:51 pm

Post by Iecerint »

P.S. -- I'm going to assume that Budja is deliberately trying to make that sound like scumtalk. :roll:
User avatar
MacavityLock
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
User avatar
User avatar
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
Impin' Ain't Easy
Posts: 2486
Joined: August 14, 2008

Post Post #1026 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:20 pm

Post by MacavityLock »

SC, why does Keanu Reeves light people on fire?
User avatar
MacavityLock
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
User avatar
User avatar
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
Impin' Ain't Easy
Posts: 2486
Joined: August 14, 2008

Post Post #1027 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:23 pm

Post by MacavityLock »

By the way, this means that the Neto-lynch was entirely town-driven, except for Boxman. :{
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1028 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:24 pm

Post by Iecerint »

Yeah. Let this be a lesson never to claim prematurely, etc.
User avatar
elvis_knits
elvis_knits
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
User avatar
User avatar
elvis_knits
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
Posts: 8610
Joined: October 13, 2005
Location: Puppytown

Post Post #1029 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:27 am

Post by elvis_knits »

AWESOME!

The best thing about that 3-way SK claim is that it makes them all scum, clearing ML, Iecerint, and myself.

And they can't get a no-lynch without one of us voting with them.

I don't know what Budja was thinking there. He can't make one of the townies vote with the scum

I'm not voting yet... I still have to think this through.

But we know FOR SURE now that SC, PErcy and Budja are all scum. We just have to figure out who is who.
Talk nerdy to me.

"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell
User avatar
StrangerCoug
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
User avatar
User avatar
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
Does not Compute
Posts: 12456
Joined: May 6, 2008
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Contact:

Post Post #1030 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:45 am

Post by StrangerCoug »

Budja wrote::lol:
SC, unvote please.
We are all outed now, surely a nolynch > Percy lynch. We'll let the town guess who the real SK is :P.
Not lynching is likely to help you and Percy most. You and I pick different targets and you win as long as I don't pick one of you.
MacavityLock wrote:SC, why does Keanu Reeves light people on fire?
Because I light the world on fire with my movie performances. Apparently, I bring notoriety.

Something came to me while I was at work, too: elvis_knits has a redirect on her, so if I (or the real SK, if I faked—let's put this in her perspective) get lynched, she has a 50-50 chance of redirecting the kill to the other Mafiate, and if she successfully does so, then we will have one of the easiest LYLO's on this site. So something for you guys to chew on.
STRANGERCOUG: Stranger Than You!

Current avatar by PurryFurry of FurAffinity.
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1031 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:50 am

Post by Iecerint »

The arson flavor is a little silly. Mine and SX's and elvis's all make sense. Neto's and Seol's didn't, though, so maybe that's all there is to it. Budja as bludgeoner fits the flavor best of what we've been given. Could be that we haven't seenthe bludgeoner's real role, though. Still happy with where I am.

SC, what do you mean by "we will have one of the easiest LYLO's on this site"? D'ya mean that we three will?
User avatar
StrangerCoug
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
User avatar
User avatar
StrangerCoug
He/Him
Does not Compute
Does not Compute
Posts: 12456
Joined: May 6, 2008
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Contact:

Post Post #1032 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:53 am

Post by StrangerCoug »

Yeah. You guys.

And I think my flavor's weird too.
STRANGERCOUG: Stranger Than You!

Current avatar by PurryFurry of FurAffinity.
User avatar
Percy
Percy
Rainbow Robot Cthulhu
User avatar
User avatar
Percy
Rainbow Robot Cthulhu
Rainbow Robot Cthulhu
Posts: 1753
Joined: October 11, 2008
Location: Sydney

Post Post #1033 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:39 pm

Post by Percy »

My beautiful bride is asleep, so I've run off to a net cafe to see what's happening with this game. (Addict? Me? Naww.....)

I'm really glad both Budja and SC have outed themselves as the scumteam. I have no idea why SC claimed SK, but Budja's claim is no doubt a result of the accuracy of my claim.

Read my claim again. Read the motives for my initial fakeclaim and what information I gathered from it.

My vote stays. Budja is the lynch today.

@Mod: I will be back in action on the 20th, so if no replacement is forthcoming I'm happy to step back into this game then.
User avatar
Budja
Budja
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Budja
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2594
Joined: October 25, 2008
Location: Australia

Post Post #1034 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:43 pm

Post by Budja »

Rules wrote:10. When Deadline is reached, the player with the most Votes will be lynched. If two or more players are tied, the player who got there first will be lynched. If nobody has any votes, there will be No Lynch. You may also vote for a No Lynch.
FFS, vote for nolynch. I am helping you scum if anything :roll:.
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1035 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:44 pm

Post by Iecerint »

Why would Budja be impressed with your SK claim and consequently counterclaim it? Wouldn't he just go along and lynch SK ftw given that RBscum can happily block EK and win him the game?
User avatar
Budja
Budja
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Budja
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2594
Joined: October 25, 2008
Location: Australia

Post Post #1036 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:44 pm

Post by Budja »

If we tie, we can get a nolynch. Seriously, its our only hope.
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1037 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:47 pm

Post by Iecerint »

Budja wrote:
Rules wrote:10. When Deadline is reached, the player with the most Votes will be lynched. If two or more players are tied, the player who got there first will be lynched. If nobody has any votes, there will be No Lynch. You may also vote for a No Lynch.
FFS, vote for nolynch. I am helping you scum if anything :roll:.
As I read that, Nolynch isn't a player. 3 on Percy trumpets 3 no NL even if NL gets there first.

ML or EK should probably take care of it just in case, though. I've neglected to point this out in the event that the wrong players are on at the time.
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1038 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:47 pm

Post by Iecerint »

Err,
trumps*
! :P
User avatar
Budja
Budja
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Budja
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2594
Joined: October 25, 2008
Location: Australia

Post Post #1039 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:48 pm

Post by Budja »

Iec wrote:I've neglected to point this out in the event that the wrong players are on at the time.
As have I.

No-lynch is a valid vote and thus if we are first we should get a no-lynch (I hope).
You hear this, scum! Last chance now, you better hurry.
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1040 (ISO) » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:49 pm

Post by Iecerint »

I'll literally throw a fit if "NoLynch" is a "player." :roll:
User avatar
elvis_knits
elvis_knits
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
User avatar
User avatar
elvis_knits
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
Posts: 8610
Joined: October 13, 2005
Location: Puppytown

Post Post #1041 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:05 am

Post by elvis_knits »

Iecerint wrote:Why would Budja be impressed with your SK claim and consequently counterclaim it? Wouldn't he just go along and lynch SK ftw given that RBscum can happily block EK and win him the game?
This.

Budja has absolutely no reason to counterclaim Percy is Percy actually is the SK.

Budja only has reason to counterclaim Percy is Percy is the RBer.

vote percy
Talk nerdy to me.

"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell
User avatar
MacavityLock
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
User avatar
User avatar
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
Impin' Ain't Easy
Posts: 2486
Joined: August 14, 2008

Post Post #1042 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:48 am

Post by MacavityLock »

elvis_knits wrote:
Iecerint wrote:Why would Budja be impressed with your SK claim and consequently counterclaim it? Wouldn't he just go along and lynch SK ftw given that RBscum can happily block EK and win him the game?
This.

Budja has absolutely no reason to counterclaim Percy is Percy actually is the SK.

Budja only has reason to counterclaim Percy is Percy is the RBer.

vote percy
My only problem with this is that I would say we were unlikely to lynch the claimed SK, as that would have possibly led to a maf win.

Hypothetical: Percy - SK, Bud, SC - maf. Percy claims and is shunted to the side, and one of Budja, SC, Iec or ML gets lynched. Iec and ML are unlikely to get lynched as well, so one of Budja or SC is likely to be. Budja, realizing this, claims SK as well, thus hoping to take pressure off himself and get Percy lynched through counterclaim.

However, I can't figure out why SC claimed SK too. And this is kind of true in all hypotheticals.

Is my hypothetical probable? Eh, maybe 20%, I don't know. But it's possible.
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1043 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:57 am

Post by Iecerint »

So you're saying that Budja may have mistakenly believed that we would believe Percy's SK claim changed the lynch target as a result?

It's possible, but I doubt it. He claimed SK right after I voted Percy. The rhetoric was going toward a Percy lynch IMO. Budja may have misperceived things, though, or maybe I did.
User avatar
MacavityLock
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
User avatar
User avatar
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
Impin' Ain't Easy
Posts: 2486
Joined: August 14, 2008

Post Post #1044 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:11 am

Post by MacavityLock »

Iecerint wrote:It's possible, but I doubt it. He claimed SK right after I voted Percy. The rhetoric was going toward a Percy lynch IMO. Budja may have misperceived things, though, or maybe I did.
That's actually not true, as I was looking out for that. However, I did previously miss your stated intention to vote Percy in 980. Yeah, I see what you mean. All very strange.
User avatar
MacavityLock
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
User avatar
User avatar
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
Impin' Ain't Easy
Posts: 2486
Joined: August 14, 2008

Post Post #1045 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:24 am

Post by MacavityLock »

MacavityLock wrote:
Iecerint wrote:It's possible, but I doubt it. He claimed SK right after I voted Percy. The rhetoric was going toward a Percy lynch IMO. Budja may have misperceived things, though, or maybe I did.
That's actually not true, as I was looking out for that. However, I did previously miss your stated intention to vote Percy in 980. Yeah, I see what you mean. All very strange.
For clarity, when I said "that's not true," it referred to your voting Percy. I believe you stated your intention to do so, but didn't actually vote him before Budja's claim.
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1046 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:35 am

Post by Iecerint »

Nah, check page 40 again. I vote Percy in 998; he votes NoLynch an hour and 15 minutes later in 999, which I believe is where he crossed the point of no return re: claiming SK.
User avatar
MacavityLock
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
User avatar
User avatar
MacavityLock
Impin' Ain't Easy
Impin' Ain't Easy
Posts: 2486
Joined: August 14, 2008

Post Post #1047 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:42 am

Post by MacavityLock »

Hey, look at that, you're right. I'm dumb. My hypothetical remains possible, but even more unlikely.

I think the die has been cast. elvis, is there anything we need to discuss re: your redirect before I hammer?
User avatar
Iecerint
Iecerint
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Iecerint
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 15766
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: San Francisco

Post Post #1048 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:44 am

Post by Iecerint »

She can do scum->scum OR SK->scum, so no wimping out from you scum! :evil:
User avatar
elvis_knits
elvis_knits
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
User avatar
User avatar
elvis_knits
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
Posts: 8610
Joined: October 13, 2005
Location: Puppytown

Post Post #1049 (ISO) » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:47 am

Post by elvis_knits »

My read of that triple SK claim is that RBPErcy claimed SK ot save himself. Budjabuddy claimed SK to try to save percy when we didn't buy it from PErcy. Then SC had to claim SK (when he actually is the SK) because he wants to give himself the best chance of winning (which is we lynch the RB).

So I will be redirecting one of Budja/SC towards the other one or themself. I don't think I should specify.

ANy better plan, lemme know!
Talk nerdy to me.

"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell
Locked