Mini 1194: Reverse Mafia [Game Over]

MrTrow · Post Post #1025 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:26 am

AntB wrote:In no way do I say we should continue under the assumption that we should play as though we have those kinds of roles.

I say we must have those kinds of roles based on what was said

said by the mod right?

So what should we not do?
Believe the mod?

Barring some very strange events on scum-team-returns-sunday i have no choice but to conclude you are town, but this combination really strikes me as off.

ToastyToast · Post Post #1026 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:29 am

FFFF I really trust the other 2 more...
but fine

Unvote:Vote:bobsnox

If this is our one shot, we have to do it.

ToastyToast · Post Post #1027 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:31 am

IM SO CONFUSED! WHY IS BUB GUARANTEED TO BE REVIVED?

MrTrow · Post Post #1028 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:54 am

@Toasty:

that was under the assumption of a pom/bub/malp scumteam.
bub was the first to hit 2.
If pom and malp both decide not to move their vote (which is what that scumteam will do if they either have sufficient power in the medium(and or bub) or confidence in their race-ability to win)
by the first-come-first-serve rule in case of ties bub will be revived and the game will end or turn into a race.

Considering the 'minor details' neither of those 3 players have actually played D3 and those among them that actually hold the votes flat out refuse to turn this into a guaranteed not completely scum-controlled revival
I`d say it is a pretty reasonable assumption.

ToastyToast · Post Post #1029 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:09 am

well that sucks.

Packbat · Post Post #1030 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:14 pm

ToastyToast wrote:FFFF I really trust the other 2 more...
but fine

Unvote:Vote:bobsnox

If this is our one shot, we have to do it.

UNVOTE: StrangerCoug
VOTE: bobsnox

But we all agree - keep reviving bobs.

IceGuy · Post Post #1031 (ISO) » Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:19 am

malp, when you read this, get my vote on bobsnox. Failure to do so will be treated as a scum claim.

Packbat · Post Post #1032 (ISO) » Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:36 am

IceGuy wrote:malp, when you read this, get my vote on bobsnox. Failure to do so will be treated as a scum claim.

QFT.

MrTrow · Post Post #1033 (ISO) » Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:38 am

IceGuy wrote:malp, when you read this,
unvote
. Failure to do so will be treated as a scum claim.

FTFY

Packbat · Post Post #1034 (ISO) » Sun Aug 21, 2011 4:50 pm

MrTrow wrote:
IceGuy wrote:malp, when you read this,
unvote
. Failure to do so will be treated as a scum claim.

FTFY

Good point - if malp has some thought on a better strategy than the bobsnox revive, there's no need to end the day instantly.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #1035 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:20 am

bobsnox, Bub Bidderskins and malpascp are all being prodded. Apologies for continued mod quietness - settling into new house & job.

bobsnox · Post Post #1036 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:27 am

Sorry - I've been busy as well. Read the last several pages. I'm under the impression malp should still be my shot. Is there any better target? (speaking to MrTrow and Packbat here)

malpascp · Post Post #1037 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:09 am

I'm not an idiot. Bub is defenitivelly town.

IceGuy · Post Post #1038 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:11 am

malpascp wrote:I'm not an idiot. Bub is defenitivelly town.

Last chance. Get my vote off Bub or be purged by bobsnox.

bobsnox · Post Post #1039 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:18 am

Trigger is cocked

Packbat · Post Post #1040 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:49 am

malpascp wrote:I'm not an idiot. Bub is defenitivelly town.

Have you read up on everything posted during your V/LA?

Packbat · Post Post #1041 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 5:21 am

EBWOP: If you have not, have you read #985, #998, and #1014?

Packbat · Post Post #1042 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:33 am

P.S. bobsnox: if malpascp unvotes, purge Bub Bidderskins.

bobsnox · Post Post #1043 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:33 am

Packbat wrote:P.S. bobsnox: if malpascp unvotes, purge Bub Bidderskins.

Ok

StrangerCoug · Post Post #1044 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:44 am

I think we have this.

Packbat · Post Post #1045 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:50 am

If ToastyToast blocks malpascp again, we'll have two shots - I'd say the odds favor us, but I'm far from equanimous.

ToastyToast · Post Post #1046 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:00 pm

malpascp: you are dumb. You just claimed scum.

Packbat · Post Post #1047 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:09 pm

ToastyToast wrote:malpascp: you are dumb. You just claimed scum.

I don't think that's quite fair, ToastyToast - smart people do stupid things all the time. Besides, many people believe that it is more often an error to back off than it is to commit, and that is all that malpascp has done in this case.

MrTrow · Post Post #1048 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:34 pm

bobsnox wrote:
Packbat wrote:P.S. bobsnox: if malpascp unvotes, purge Bub Bidderskins.

Ok

Short version: against
Long version: not until the unvote

Packbat · Post Post #1049 (ISO) » Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:56 pm

I'd like to hear it after the game if it's all right, MrTrow. Unvote doesn't seem likely.

My logic is pretty simple: even if malpascp unvotes, we will still be certain of Pomegranate's alignment, and Pom voted Bub. Obviously malpascp would still be a strong candidate for jinxing, but I don't see that purging him is the lesser risk.