"Nah. I think there's a scum on my wagon, and I think [Red]'s the one." is what you were saying.
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:37 pm
by Johhog
Yeah, exactly. I don't think that Xanatos is on my wagon.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:25 am
by redFF
yes empking clearly picked up the thing that i cant talk about that makes xanatos town =D
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:36 am
by Johhog
I don't see it, but I have to trust you for now. UNVOTE: David Xanatos
This probably makes redFF town too. :/ VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
Non-poster. Will change it when I get a reasonable scumread on someone.
Oh, and Red, you probably have to explain why David is town either tomorrow or today, so we know it's not a scumgambit.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:45 am
by Empking
↑redFF wrote:yes empking clearly picked up the thing that i cant talk about that makes xanatos town =D
Oh no, I'm just taking your word for it.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:58 am
by Johhog
↑redFF wrote:i demand you to explain now its anti town to withhold information/analysis. plus u might die that night.
↑redFF wrote:for reasons i cant go into, i really really really think davidxanatos is town, based on something i cannot talk about, but im sure vifam knows about it, but i can't talk about it, but i think xanatos is town.
Um...
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:24 am
by Ironhead
VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
Non-poster. Will change it when I get a reasonable scumread on someone.
This is a good point -- the discussion is being driven by the same players who are actively posting; and the rest of the players have failed to join the discussion. If there is scum in the lurkers -- which there almost certainly are, based on mathematical odds alone -- then we are letting them fly under the radar for free.
GM: Has everyone responded to their prods from when the game restarted?
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:34 am
by Vifam
Lurking has been a problem in this game since page 13.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:28 am
by redFF
vifam will back me up on the reason i cant talk about that xanatos is town. RIGHT VIFAM.
↑redFF wrote:i demand you to explain now its anti town to withhold information/analysis. plus u might die that night.
↑redFF wrote:for reasons i cant go into, i really really really think davidxanatos is town, based on something i cannot talk about, but im sure vifam knows about it, but i can't talk about it, but i think xanatos is town.
Um...
im not withholding information/analysis, im putting it out there, its just im not allowed to talk about the reason i think xanatos is town.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:39 am
by Johhog
O_o
Well then. When will you tell us? You have to realise that I'm afraid this is a lolgambit from scum.
Or I'm just curious.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:32 am
by Vifam
It's due to an ongoing game.
RedFF is taking it way to seriously.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:46 am
by Johhog
No fuck no. You realise that this can cause a modkill/force-replacement on you/redFF/David depending on what happened, right? FUCK!
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:50 am
by Vifam
I don't think so, we never specified the game.
If we get modkilled, I guess I'm just gonna have to deal with it.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:52 am
by mastin2
Could've sworn I posted this last night. Guess I was just too tired to tell the difference.
Spoiler: RQS Responders
1. Empking <--Answered in 23, all 25.
2. Hoppster Kcdaspot <--Hoppster answered the first 24 in 854. Can't find 25. Kcdaspot answered first 24 in #64.
3. Estyn <--Answered all my questions in 32.
4. Xeras <--Answered first 24 in 188.
5. Foolish Fool (Haylen + JordanA24) <--Jordan answered in 85 (first 24+custom) and 124 (25). If Haylen answered, I can't find it in their ISOs.
6. mastin2 <--I should go as close to last as possible.
7. Vifam <--First 24 in #37, finished in 92.
8. Lady Lambadelta BomberMan <--LLD hasn't posted. Bomberman answered first 24 in 361.
9. projectmatt Fool_Hardy <--Fool did First 24 in #87. Can't find 25. Matt answered first 24 in 872.
10. David Xanatos <--Refused to answer.
11. Oversoul <--Answered first 24 in #26, fininshed in #48.
12. Ironhead MintKitten <--Mint never posted. Ironhead answered first 24 in 890. Didn't answer 25, though.
13. bvoigt whiTE_Teaz <--White never posted. BV hasn't answered.
14. LordChronos <--Answers first 24 in 227. Didn't answer 25.
15. Johhog <--First 24 in #30, 25 in 125.
16. LTP Mafia <--Only has a confirm post.
17. Secret Project (evilpacman18 + MrBump) <--Pac Answered first 22 (!) in 57. And continued in 60/62 to answer my questions. The other head answers in 474.
18. donkwich <--No posts.
19. lewarcher82 <--Also no posts.
20. redFF <--Answered first 24 in 26, finished in 27.
Hoppster, Xeras, Matt, Ironhead, and Chronos:
Please answer questions 25A+25B. I realize they're a little easier to miss, but just as important.
Haylen half of Foolish Fool, LLD/Bomberman's slot,
(technically)
David Xanatos, BV/WT's slot, LTP Mafia's slot, Donkwich's slot, and Lewarcher's slot:
You'll need to answer all of the questions.
They can be found here (first 24) and are finished here.
Yes, these questions are important. Once I've gotten fully into the game, they're potentially groundbreaking.
I realize it isn't much to you, of course. When you see this list compiled and posted, your first cry would most likely be "Fluff!" It's not. It not only is a way to scumhunt, but is ALSO a convenient reference, doubling as a way to get me back into the game. It'll be very time-consuming to do, but hey. I'm Mastin. Obsessively giving games far more than a normal person is just what I *do*. (And, y'know, the whole "last game before semi-retirement" thing--wanting to end on a high note, rather than an all-time-low.)
i neither confirm nor deny the validity of this statement.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:10 am
by Johhog
I will beat you up badly if he said something like "I've not been scum the latest 10 games" and you believed it. Oh well, I suppose we shouldn't talk about this any more.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:23 am
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
Working on vote count/prods/etc. now. It'll be up soon.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:43 am
by ObliviousDruidMuncher
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 11:47 am
by David Xanatos
10) Prods will be issued after 72 hours without posting.
I've not been off for 72 >.>
CMAR put that. My rule is 48. Just a heads up. I changed it in the OP.
~sorasgoof/ObliviousDruidMuncher
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:51 pm
by Ironhead
↑mastin2 wrote:An additional question I want to ask everyone:
25A: Do you play more for fun, or more for the thrill of victory?
25B: Your stance aside, do you think others should play with a similar outlook? Explain why or why not.
A. Both -- victory is fun. But it is only a game, so I don't get too wrapped up in a loss.
B. Yes -- over-competitiveness turns players into jerks; under-competitiveness turns them into pushovers.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:45 pm
by Secret Project
It's back!
Guess I shoulda been checking this hydra account more often. I'll get Marill and we'll get back to work.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:21 pm
by LordChronos
Mod: Please replace me.
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:43 am
by Vifam
SIGH.
This day is depressing.
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:51 am
by Hoppster
↑mastin2 wrote:An additional question I want to ask everyone:
25A: Do you play more for fun, or more for the thrill of victory?
25B: Your stance aside, do you think others should play with a similar outlook? Explain why or why not.
25A: Thrill of victory.
25B: Yes, I do. Playing for thrill of victory is the only way that the game is playable. Playing for any other reason undermines the integrity of the game.
David Xanatos wrote:10) Prods will be issued after 72 hours without posting.
I've not been off for 72 >.>
Why are you posting content in other games but not here, David?