Mafiascum.net

VOTE: Aegor

Sup?

OK, I've had my wincon changed to town MVP, which I am assuming was the work of Aegor. If it was it would make him VT now.

Scum is probably Juls/Kuribo. Juls for all the stuff from yesterday but especially the whole "I suspected dgb/farside" all along thing when dgb's wagon came up, especially given farside was the one that exposed dgb which would make no sense if they were a scumteam. Kuribo's predecessor was scummy in the handful of posts he made and then kuribo's prevarication around the d/l yesterday added to that read.

VOTE: Kuribo

↑ Hostile Intent wrote:VOTE: Aegor

Sup?

Why are you voting the player you were town reading?

Marry Mark, learn the order of events. I suspected farside/DGB for a while. I put my vote down on DGB and then farside outed DGB. I didn't post again after that. Would I have changed my vote had I seen that before the end of day? Maybe, maybe not. I'm not sure. DGB is notorious for the bus. Regardless, why vote kuribos over me? You know I had way more attention yesterday.

Farside and HI didn't die, so I am still of the theory that one is scum. I am vote parking on farside until she or I die. HI had a couple of town-tells yesterday.

VOTE: farside

Fine



States no reason for the current scum read from juls.
Non-responsive comments about why she has the scum reads she's claimed to have.
Loverizatiion explaination reasoning is crap.
When questions are awnsered that juls wants, she does not respond any issues with response, in other words no engagement.
Uses her role as Wifom.

Your reasons are boring and false farside. I answered everything you said.

↑ Juls wrote:Your reasons are boring and false farside. I answered everything you said.

Quote where you did.

↑ Juls wrote:Marry Mark, learn the order of events. I suspected farside/DGB for a while. I put my vote down on DGB and then farside outed DGB. I didn't post again after that. Would I have changed my vote had I seen that before the end of day? Maybe, maybe not. I'm not sure. DGB is notorious for the bus. Regardless, why vote kuribos over me? You know I had way more attention yesterday.

Farside and HI didn't die, so I am still of the theory that one is scum. I am vote parking on farside until she or I die. HI had a couple of town-tells yesterday.

VOTE: farside

Oh and she is lining up lynches.
When I flip town she as scum would go after HI under WIFOM that we didn't die so one must be scum.
Not logical thought process considering scum may no kill just for that WIFOM and juls is smart enough to know that.

No, I probably wouldn't. But nice misrepresenting.

And yes I would want my lunch as long as juls is lynched tomorrow as confirmed scum for non responsive case on dgb, ignoring hip/kuribo who I scum read as well and she is not attacking that player, but attacked everyone else for voting her.
Scum tend to avoid too much interaction with scum buddy as juls displayed with kuribo thus far.

↑ Juls wrote:Marry Mark, learn the order of events. I suspected farside/DGB for a while. I put my vote down on DGB and then farside outed DGB. I didn't post again after that. Would I have changed my vote had I seen that before the end of day? Maybe, maybe not. I'm not sure. DGB is notorious for the bus. Regardless, why vote kuribos over me? You know I had way more attention yesterday.

Farside and HI didn't die, so I am still of the theory that one is scum. I am vote parking on farside until she or I die. HI had a couple of town-tells yesterday.

VOTE: farside

Tell me with the bold how I am misreprensted your position of the one must be scum?

And can someone explain again how my role makes more sense as scum? Yesterday the theory was that I had to loverize two people in the night and get them lynched. Since that didn't happen, what is the reason du jour that scum would have a loverizor?

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ Juls wrote:Marry Mark, learn the order of events. I suspected farside/DGB for a while. I put my vote down on DGB and then farside outed DGB. I didn't post again after that. Would I have changed my vote had I seen that before the end of day? Maybe, maybe not. I'm not sure. DGB is notorious for the bus. Regardless, why vote kuribos over me? You know I had way more attention yesterday.

Farside and HI didn't die, so I am still of the theory that one is scum. I am vote parking on farside until she or I die. HI had a couple of town-tells yesterday.

VOTE: farside

Tell me with the bold how I am misreprensted your position of the one must be scum?

The last sentence clearly states that he town told. How does that equate to me setting up his lynch?

↑ farside22 wrote:Fine

Vote: juls

States no reason for the current scum read from juls.
Non-responsive comments about why she has the scum reads she's claimed to have.
Loverizatiion explaination reasoning is crap.
When questions are awnsered that juls wants, she does not respond any issues with response, in other words no engagement.
Uses her role as Wifom.

↑ Juls wrote:And can someone explain again how my role makes more sense as scum? Yesterday the theory was that I had to loverize two people in the night and get them lynched. Since that didn't happen, what is the reason du jour that scum would have a loverizor?

[quote="In post 1029, farside22]
Uses her role as Wifom.[/quote]

That doesn't explain how it is a scum role. Not everything is wifom. I legitimately want to know how anyone thinks scum has night kills plus the ability to loverize. Clearly I did not expect a no-kill or a kill block yesterday or I wouldn't have stated my role was 100% town. Now I want to know how my role is scum. Please, educate me.

The mod randomized my target because I didn't submit one. He also didn't tell me who I targeted.

↑ Hostile Intent wrote:VOTE: Aegor

Sup?

Weird considering Aegor claimed a role he might have been able to prove (and apparently did prove).

Hey t-tone,
How are you today?

What do you think of juls WIFOM the night kill for the lovers, but she says nothing about a claimed bg being alive and wifom on that?

I disagree with your "scum could no kill for WIFOM" comment, that seems like a dumb play at this point considering a missing kill night 1. As for scum not killing the lovers pair...here's the thing. If one of you is scum, obviously you kill someone else (Konowa I guess). But I feel like the best play for youscum would be to lynch HI (or vise versa for HIscum).

Bottom line in this case analyzing the choice of kill about the lover pair is unproductive. I don't like that immediate jump to conclusion, and coming from anyone but Juls (who has already expressly scumread you) I'd be suspicious.

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ Hostile Intent wrote:VOTE: Aegor

Sup?

Why are you voting the player you were town reading?

I'd like to speak with him and I don't want to string anyone else up too swiftly.

↑ T-Bone wrote:

↑ Hostile Intent wrote:VOTE: Aegor

Sup?

Weird considering Aegor claimed a role he might have been able to prove (and apparently did prove).

False. My wincon was changed N1 just as Mark's was and Aegor hasn't said he was a part of that.

Mark said his was changed to Aegor's last night.

↑ T-Bone wrote:I disagree with your "scum could no kill for WIFOM" comment, that seems like a dumb play at this point considering a missing kill night 1. As for scum not killing the lovers pair...here's the thing. If one of you is scum, obviously you kill someone else (Konowa I guess). But I feel like the best play for youscum would be to lynch HI (or vise versa for HIscum).

Bottom line in this case analyzing the choice of kill about the lover pair is unproductive. I don't like that immediate jump to conclusion, and coming from anyone but Juls (who has already expressly scumread you) I'd be suspicious.

What I meant was not kill the lovers, especially as juls said if they don't die one must be scum.
That is either scum juls wifom or allowing scum to wifom a night kill.

↑ Hostile Intent wrote:

↑ farside22 wrote:

↑ Hostile Intent wrote:VOTE: Aegor

Sup?

Why are you voting the player you were town reading?

I'd like to speak with him and I don't want to string anyone else up too swiftly.

↑ T-Bone wrote:

↑ Hostile Intent wrote:VOTE: Aegor

Sup?

Weird considering Aegor claimed a role he might have been able to prove (and apparently did prove).

False. My wincon was changed N1 just as Mark's was and Aegor hasn't said he was a part of that.

Why the vote on aegor?
No offense but aegor did not respond much day 2 to votes, you are not scum reading him from our discussion, why the vote?

↑ T-Bone wrote:Mark said his was changed to Aegor's last night.

Oh, was Aegor MVP? I forgot.

↑ farside22 wrote:
Why the vote on aegor?
No offense but aegor did not respond much day 2 to votes, you are not scum reading him from our discussion, why the vote?

Eh, I hadn't taken that into consideration. I just wanted him to see it and come forward with his result. I'm not scumreading him, its just a "hey let's talk about your ability" kind of thing.

UNVOTE: Aegor

Rampage, have you asked the mod and they simply haven't replied about your target yet? Did you know your role is compulsive?