Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1025 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:22 am

I mean...it's just...I don't understand...

I'm still waiting for the rest of town to catch up and realise that Nati is scum.

Seriously.

Natirasha · Post Post #1026 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:47 am

Yeah, you don't understand my sarcasm.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1027 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:48 am

I just reply to what you tell me.

Why you voting Desp?

Natirasha · Post Post #1028 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:49 am

I'm a sheep.

baa~

theaceofspades · Post Post #1029 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:49 am

ger actually makes a good point on desp. but i also agree with BBT that the wagon is scummy. I'd still like to lynch PC. Come on now guys.

Also. Can the people scumreading BBT and ger tell me why they are reading those people that way? i just don't see it.

Desperado · Post Post #1030 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:41 pm

Which point specifically was good?

Natirasha · Post Post #1031 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:25 pm

↑ theaceofspades wrote:Also. Can the people scumreading BBT and ger tell me why they are reading those people that way? i just don't see it.

I feel BBT's being overly nitpicky.

theaceofspades · Post Post #1032 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:17 pm

@ desp post 1017

Desperado · Post Post #1033 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 6:23 pm

I don't think there's anything scummy about voting townies.

Especially townies who a) get lynched or b) play masons so poorly that they have to claim d2 to prevent both of their lynches.

Desperado · Post Post #1034 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 6:24 pm

PS I've actually been there. Fast and Furious mafia. It was my first time rolling masons--that's why I asked. We played it terribly and it really fucked the town over.

ika · Post Post #1035 (ISO) » Fri Oct 17, 2014 7:09 pm

you know if anyone doubts the masons claims....

you need to look back at day one early interactions between shos claim and narious vote and then how things progessed from there.

anrous reaction to shos fakeclaim and followup match what i would expect from an inexperinced mason (no offense)

furthermore im going to sheep somewhat pants of this but the claim doestn fit right with me either.

that being said.

randomly updated readliest wiht 0 resoning:

theaceofspades

2. Shos

3. Perfect Chaos (Metal Sonic / Formerfish)

4. Aronis
5. Natirasha
6. geraintm

7. GrayFoxxxx

8. ika
9. DoubleTrouble (MathBlade / Titus)

11. Desperado

12. BlueBloodedToffee

if im less drunk later i may put some sort of reasoning

shos · Post Post #1036 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:23 am

↑ Aronis wrote:
↑ shos wrote:Well someone please fucking talk instead of explaibing why you arent, or FFS sheep me.

Hi, shos Will you help me lynch BBT?

no! he is one of my best townreads! vote ace!

↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Desp wagon so scummy.

truedat.

shos · Post Post #1037 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:26 am

↑ ika wrote:you know if anyone doubts the masons claims....

you need to look back at day one early interactions between shos claim and narious vote and then how things progessed from there.

anrous reaction to shos fakeclaim and followup match what i would expect from an inexperinced mason (no offense)

furthermore im going to sheep somewhat pants of this but the claim doestn fit right with me either.

can you reexplain this to me? I totally doubt the masonclaim(moreover with the last catchup by germany TM) and I don't see how it relates to my fakeclaim game start?

Majiffy · Post Post #1038 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:22 am

↑ geraintm wrote:Is gray fox in this game?
Post 342 to 821 to nothing.

Mod???

I was keeping him in with good faith to his computer situation but it's evident that he isn't going to be able to play the game at a decent capacity.

I'll replace him shortly.

geraintm · Post Post #1039 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:47 am

↑ shos wrote:
↑ ika wrote:you know if anyone doubts the masons claims....

you need to look back at day one early interactions between shos claim and narious vote and then how things progessed from there.

anrous reaction to shos fakeclaim and followup match what i would expect from an inexperinced mason (no offense)

furthermore im going to sheep somewhat pants of this but the claim doestn fit right with me either.

can you reexplain this to me? I totally doubt the masonclaim(moreover with the last catchup by germany TM) and I don't see how it relates to my fakeclaim game start?

I'm not sure why you doubt it. Just because you've seen scum claim mason elsewhere, is that a common thing? Are most mason claims scum?
And it is easily testable later on in the game if you are truly paranoid about it. Just go with it, it will make today much simpler.

geraintm · Post Post #1040 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:47 am

↑ Majiffy wrote:
↑ geraintm wrote:Is gray fox in this game?
Post 342 to 821 to nothing.

Mod???

I was keeping him in with good faith to his computer situation but it's evident that he isn't going to be able to play the game at a decent capacity.

I'll replace him shortly.

I didn't know there was a computer situation, I just noticed not posting in this game whilst there had been some activity elsewhere

shos · Post Post #1041 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:10 am

Well, if you see the last Inuyasha game(ended very short while ago: the longest game on mafiascum yet, even beat FE:A) you'll see a "friendly neighbour" claim that was "confirmed'' by his partner. they did not fear to do that because they had a kind of mechanism to protect them, like, if the FN dies he could be revived. so, for example, if you are BP scum, or anything alike, have a BG, JK, roleblock, doc, etc; all these can help you keep both of the masons alive. and it is obviously a wifom in the future unless there's a cop, so yes, I'm wary of that claim. two of my scumreads suddenly claim masons? suspicious.

geraintm · Post Post #1042 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:33 am

You are giving me way more credit than I deserve. Thank you for that.

ika · Post Post #1043 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:51 am

↑ shos wrote:
↑ ika wrote:you know if anyone doubts the masons claims....

you need to look back at day one early interactions between shos claim and narious vote and then how things progessed from there.

anrous reaction to shos fakeclaim and followup match what i would expect from an inexperinced mason (no offense)

furthermore im going to sheep somewhat pants of this but the claim doestn fit right with me either.

can you reexplain this to me? I totally doubt the masonclaim(moreover with the last catchup by germany TM) and I don't see how it relates to my fakeclaim game start?

it relates to how anaous acted towards your fakeclaim. if he was scum he could of done nothing and let it go but instead he came out and voted you

his mindset follows the mindset that i would be expecting from an inexperinced mason

shos · Post Post #1044 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:14 am

I'll reread tomorrow.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1045 (ISO) » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:35 pm

Ika, you going to explain your reads?

Specifically, I'm interested in why you think both Desp and PC are scum.

shos · Post Post #1046 (ISO) » Sun Oct 19, 2014 5:36 am

VOTE: grayfoxxx

geraintm · Post Post #1047 (ISO) » Sun Oct 19, 2014 5:42 am

↑ shos wrote:VOTE: grayfoxxx

THis seems....pointless.
They are about to be replaced and they are going to get a free pass for the rest of today. Just seems like voting for voting sake.
If you were going to vote them.for being absent then should have happened a few days ago

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #1048 (ISO) » Sun Oct 19, 2014 5:56 am

I agree, that seems a waste of a vote.

Vote PC please Shos.

Titus · Post Post #1049 (ISO) » Sun Oct 19, 2014 5:59 am

Mod: Replace me for DT.

Ika our reads are agreeing. Let's flip them while I got my eyes on you bc you are ika.