Mafiascum.net

In post 1011, Flicker wrote:

In post 569, Flicker wrote:

@NicoRobin and randommidget

- Are you caught up? Do you have any reads on people you'd care to share (that you haven't already)?

@the worst:

In post 719, Flicker wrote:

In post 636, the worst wrote:and that people wanting flips really early actually has town equity?

How? Why? I don't understand this at

all

.

[...]

How about your read on Skygazer? Are you just memeing, or are you really scumreading her?

I'd still like answers to these questions, too.

that question was asked to throw you off, it's a pretty situational thing. subconsciously pushing for quicklynches is high scum equity, ergo really obviously pushing for quick lynches should always be considered "too dumb to be scum" in at least some respect. it felt like a pretty 2d read from you which is what prompted me to say it.

skyg is still probwolf

In post 1024, Elsa Jay wrote:Worst, I never got a flavor and I'm a Neutral. Pretty damn sure scum dont either.

The flavor is revealed only on the flip. Period.

I asked the question For Raisins :3

In post 1023, the worst wrote:

@A50

would you define the flavour of this game as contributory towards alignment?

Why do you think the flavour was []?

In post 1023, the worst wrote:will scum be given fakeclaims / knowledge of flavours which are or are not in the game?

You mean, like.. "You may claim ?".

In post 1027, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1023, the worst wrote:

@A50

would you define the flavour of this game as contributory towards alignment?

Why do you think the flavour was [

redacted

]?

In post 1023, the worst wrote:will scum be given fakeclaims / knowledge of flavours which are or are not in the game?

You mean, like.. "You may claim

[full flavour will be revealed upon your flip or at the end of the game]

?".

from this point I formally declare intent to dayvig anyone who talks about flavour

(we should start a firefly discussion thread separately tho bc <3)

my favorite vape juice flavor is cinnamon toast crunch

In post 1028, the worst wrote:

In post 1027, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1023, the worst wrote:

@A50

would you define the flavour of this game as contributory towards alignment?

Why do you think the flavour was [

redacted

]?

In post 1023, the worst wrote:will scum be given fakeclaims / knowledge of flavours which are or are not in the game?

You mean, like.. "You may claim

[full flavour will be revealed upon your flip or at the end of the game]

?".

from this point I formally declare intent to dayvig anyone who talks about flavour

(we should start a firefly discussion thread separately tho bc <3)

Tfw you never know if they telling the truth or not so you do what they say to not get shot.

people keep telling me firefly is awesome but I never got around to it

if only I find someone nerdy enough to watch with me on rabbit

-tor

In post 1031, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:people keep telling me firefly is awesome but I never got around to it

if only I find someone nerdy enough to watch with me on rabbit

-tor

wing = raised
timezones tho

In post 1032, the worst wrote:

In post 1031, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:people keep telling me firefly is awesome but I never got around to it

if only I find someone nerdy enough to watch with me on rabbit

-tor

wing = raised
timezones tho

we'll get around to it I'm sure

In post 1022, Elsa Jay wrote:I'm actually curious how many town there is now, though.

I'm guessing between 9-11 of you are town in this Multiball. Depends on the situation.

Btw, getting this out there, but do any of you think Lyncher/Jester is a possibility and we just have a 4 man mafia team with neutrals roaming around?

Me, a Serial Killer, and a Lyncher\Jester?

Quoting this again since I REALLY want to discuss any possibilities here.

votecount

With 17 alive it takes 9 to lynch.

Malakittens (4):	the worst (669),	Nancy Drew Shogunate (947),	CheekyTeeky (949),	Elsa Jay (1007),
BuJaber (3):	Flicker (497),	Skygazer (881),	Chickadee (957),
Reasonably Rational (2):	NicoRobin (473),	Thor665 (544),
Nancy Drew Shogunate (2):	RadiantCowbells (776),	Reasonably Rational (786),
Flicker (1):	northsidegal (153),
RadiantCowbells (1):	BuJaber (384),
Elsa Jay (1):	Toogeloo (729),
Not voting (3):	TPFKAP,	randomidget,	Malakittens (90),

(expired on 2018-10-16 02:00:00) remain.

In post 991, the worst wrote:

In post 990, Chickadee wrote:

In post 974, the worst wrote:

In post 773, Chickadee wrote:You should know me better than this RC. And your vote on me is bad. If you're so sure Elsa and Tor are scum, why vote me? You haven't even mentioned me much.

has chickadee been dayvigged yet? asking for a friend

Ouch

the friend is you <3
but also it's true >:C

could you throw me your most unsafe claws-out tiered reads list with a couple of spicy reasons?

I don't like spicy food, thanks.

Toogeloo - Some of their posts seem a bit off, but I like their response to me talking about flavor in the beginning. They seemed to be the only one to really catch what I was saying. Not sure it's AI, but I have them as null town.
the worst - I don't want to shoot this slot, which gives me pause. But I have no reason to think they're scum.
NicoRobin - null
RadiantCowbells - Not reading right now, need to clear my mind of this slot. (though I don't like some of his reaction testing)
Nancy Drew Shogunate - Not reading right now, need to clear my mind of this slot.
TPFKAP - null
Chickadee - That's meeee!
Flicker - Town
Thor665 - Town
BuJaber - waiting to hear back from him about his stance on me. For now this is where my vote stays. He says I've been wagon jumping immediately after my first vote of the game. It seems like scum trying to find footing and failing.
CheekyTeeky - town
Skygazer - town
Elsa Jay - Neutral. I believe the 3p claim for now. At the very least there's no world where I lynch this claim D1. It's not a cause for concern at the moment.
Reasonably Rational - Town
Malakittens - I don't have many opinions about this slot. Maybe that's worrisome? Other people are scum reading them...and I keep forgetting they're in this game.
randomidget - Also forgot random was in the game.
northsidegal - null town.

In post 947, Toranaga wrote:VOTE: malakittens

if I roll with your RC read, cheeky

this will be scum

what? i don't logically follow. i'm pretty sure that cheeky is townreading RC, so why does town RC imply scum malakittens? my thinking was the exact opposite - rc and malakittens seem to have some history together and it seems like he's able to read her pretty well, so i've put her down as town for now.

i think flicker is probably scum and i think she probably lives very far into the game (maybe even endgame if we lose) if i don't put effort into getting her lynched

that's not a promise of effort, just a reflection on myself and the way games have been going for me recently.

i think cheeky, malakittens, skygazer and RC are all town. a simple explanation for my RC townread would be his replacing out. from that townread malakittens also being town follows. cheeky and skygazer (to put it succinctly, as i seem to do everything nowadays) seem very engaged and "in-tune" in a way such that i would be very surprised if either was scum - at least, from what i've seen so far.

i'm coming around to bujaber being scum. i think 909 is a really bad post that's scum indicative not in the sense of "what? i don't understand how you could have that thought and thus you be scum", but moreso in the sense that i just don't think they're thoughts that bujaber genuinely has. like, these lines specifically:

In post 909, BuJaber wrote:RC claimed scum. Policy lynchable.

Then when Tora replaced out he did. Because he would have lost the empathy votes.

i find very unbelievable. saying that rc replaced out when tor did because otherwise he would have lost "empathy votes" implies that RC is still trying to advance scum wincon by replacing out, which... doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

and also i still think flicker is scum.

NSG can you case flicker please?

If flicker is voting for BuJaber do you think it's possible one of your reads could be wrong?

hard agree on RC/Cheeky.....not convinced on Skygazer or mala at all

In post 1042, the worst wrote:hard agree on RC/Cheeky.....not convinced on Skygazer or mala at all

if you think rc is town you should also probably think mala is town, although i concede that perhaps my skygazer read might change

In post 1041, CheekyTeeky wrote:If flicker is voting for BuJaber do you think it's possible one of your reads could be wrong?

-shrug-

that thought occurred to me very briefly before i decided that i don't think it's worth thinking about at this point.

In post 1040, CheekyTeeky wrote:NSG can you case flicker please?

Here's the thing: do you think we're far enough into the day that:

1) Flicker has enough content that anything I say couldn't be explained away by it just being early in the day
2) A case I make is actually likely to make progress towards getting Flicker lynched and not just having random votes on and off the wagon?

These aren't rhetorical questions, they're just completely serious questions. Part of the reason why sometimes I guess I don't do much is because I very much so like to give things time so that people can produce enough content where either their newer content makes me rethink my read from their earlier posting, or they have enough posts such that anything I bring up is actually meaningful and won't just be overlooked as an artifact of it being early on in the game.

In post 1043, northsidegal wrote:if you think rc is town you should also probably think mala is town,

I understand you think mala is town just because RC thinks Mala is town. Is that the only reason because I find that hard to believe?

I can say right now that post Flicker made -today- was either IIOA (in the strict sense of the acronym) or pretty much entirely empty questioning. Look through her ISO if you don't believe me.

In post 1046, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 1043, northsidegal wrote:if you think rc is town you should also probably think mala is town,

I understand you think mala is town just because RC thinks Mala is town. Is that the only reason because I find that hard to believe?

I wouldn't call it the reason but I would say that it's a big part of it (which I don't think is unreasonable). I think on her own some of her recent content is towny.

In post 1045, northsidegal wrote:1) Flicker has enough content that anything I say couldn't be explained away by it just being early in the day
2) A case I make is actually likely to make progress towards getting Flicker lynched and not just having random votes on and off the wagon?

A case is what you make it, it doesn't have to be big or elaborate, just something to help others see what it is you're seeing.

2 doesn't make sense to me - is it a self-defeatist statement? Are you saying "why bother trying?"