Mafiascum.net

I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.

In post 1009, Titus wrote:VOTE: Eventide

Katsuki, please vote Bitmap.

Huh-wuh?

In post 1014, Titus wrote:I want to see what happens.

Okaaaaaay

In post 1025, RCEnigma wrote:I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.

Do you think my wagon on me back then was a serious wagon?

In post 1025, RCEnigma wrote:I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.

You think Sailor is Bitmap's partner?

I'm not really sure how this theory makes sense honestly

In post 1027, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1014, Titus wrote:I want to see what happens.

Okaaaaaay

I have a proxy vote which means I can progress both major wagons while being a net neutral on vca.

What exactly about that conflict made you think it was manufactured to draw pressure away from Bitmap?

In post 1030, Titus wrote:

In post 1027, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1014, Titus wrote:I want to see what happens.

Okaaaaaay

I have a proxy vote which means I can progress both major wagons while being a net neutral on vca.

VOTE: Titus

In post 1032, popsofctown wrote:

In post 1030, Titus wrote:

In post 1027, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1014, Titus wrote:I want to see what happens.

Okaaaaaay

I have a proxy vote which means I can progress both major wagons while being a net neutral on vca.

VOTE: Titus

terrible vote.

In post 1033, Tana and Ephraim wrote:

In post 1032, popsofctown wrote:

In post 1030, Titus wrote:

In post 1027, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1014, Titus wrote:I want to see what happens.

Okaaaaaay

I have a proxy vote which means I can progress both major wagons while being a net neutral on vca.

VOTE: Titus

terrible vote.

I sort of liked it.

In post 1029, Dannflor wrote:

In post 1025, RCEnigma wrote:I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.

You think Sailor is Bitmap's partner?

I'm not really sure how this theory makes sense honestly

The emotional manipulation line is just the kind of in your face scum brag I could see coming from Krazy. So Krazy knows the kind of player RC is and how confrontation with him gets blown out of proportion regardless of how small the original issue is. So why engage in it?

In post 1028, Bitmap wrote:

In post 1025, RCEnigma wrote:I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.

Do you think my wagon on me back then was a serious wagon?

It had potential to be.

In post 1030, Titus wrote:

In post 1027, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1014, Titus wrote:I want to see what happens.

Okaaaaaay

I have a proxy vote which means I can progress both major wagons while being a net neutral on vca.

Forgot about that

RCE kinda feels like he's back seating the issue a little ngl

In post 1029, Dannflor wrote:

In post 1025, RCEnigma wrote:I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.

You think Sailor is Bitmap's partner?

I'm not really sure how this theory makes sense honestly

I honestly don’t know how RCE even comes up with this, or particularly who played in PFUPs. @RCE, in what world, do you ever think this is scum!Krazy here, after that game?

In post 1038, Gamma Emerald wrote:RCE kinda feels like he's back seating the issue a little ngl

He either has amnesia or my read on him was wrong.

In post 1035, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 1029, Dannflor wrote:

In post 1025, RCEnigma wrote:I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.

You think Sailor is Bitmap's partner?

I'm not really sure how this theory makes sense honestly

The emotional manipulation line is just the kind of in your face scum brag I could see coming from Krazy. So Krazy knows the kind of player RC is and how confrontation with him gets blown out of proportion regardless of how small the original issue is. So why engage in it?

In future games, I will be ignoring your Krazy reads and FL’s obviously.

Nancy, not everyone holds meta to the same regard

Sailor, your thoughts on recent events?

Can Shiro bake a cookie?

In post 1040, Sailor Senshi wrote:

In post 1038, Gamma Emerald wrote:RCE kinda feels like he's back seating the issue a little ngl

He either has amnesia or my read on him was wrong.

Leaning amnesia based on LNT, where I posted a role pm from an old MU game and he sr me for it.

In post 1042, Dannflor wrote:Nancy, not everyone holds meta to the same regard

Except it's a meta-based argument in the first place.

RCE is arguing:
a) that my argument with RC was faked (0.o)
b) for the sake of saving Bitmap (was the wagon on Bitmap growing at that point?)
c) based on his sense that I am like to "scum brag" as scum (???)

C is an explicitly a meta-based argument which raises the question of what games he imagines I "scum bragged" in. He's played with me twice as scum iirc and imo neither of those games included me "scum bragging" -- although all three individual components of his argument seem sketch.

Also.

In post 508, Sailor Senshi wrote:Gamma spat might make Gamma town and I have no problem with the push on Bitmap

None of these things are actually interesting, they're things that happened in the thread but that doesn't make them actually worth comment unless I feel like Bitmap or pops is actually worth a push.

I actually specifically said that one of the reason I wasn't engaging more in the thread was because I basically had no problem with the Bitmap wagon which is why I was skeptical of the need to push our slot for content in the first place. If the game was already advancing on a good wagon, why is it *my slot* that produced an argument to 'save' Bitmap?

-Mercury

I can't even take a cookie from you?

Can I get your rankings from 965?

In post 1043, Titus wrote:Sailor, your thoughts on recent events?

Can Shiro bake a cookie?

How does this whole proxy thing work? Why are you telling Katsuki to vote on a different wagon than you are?

Can you explain your Bitmap read? I initially tl him but on reread, it’s more of a null.

I asked Shiro. Any preferences if the answer is yes?

Hmph...

The proxy thing works by Katsuki voting who I say. I already answered why the different wagon...VCA.

Shiro should bake a cookie matching your hydra's mood.

In post 1039, Sailor Senshi wrote:

In post 1029, Dannflor wrote:

In post 1025, RCEnigma wrote:I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.

You think Sailor is Bitmap's partner?

I'm not really sure how this theory makes sense honestly

I honestly don’t know how RCE even comes up with this, or particularly

anyone

who played in PFUPs. @RCE, in what world, do you ever think this is scum!Krazy here, after that game?

A.) I'm pretty sure it was argued Krazy had low involvement in pfup (I still don't know what head was which)
B.) Pfup was a meta outlier for all of your scum games. I think a lot higher of your scum potential than was shown there.
C.) I've been exploring a hypothetical why the distraction would occur and Dann narrowed it into "RCE thinks Sailor is bits partner." Which is not what I said.