Posted: Thu May 07, 2020 3:05 pm
VOTE: hoctac
Okay, what is so bad about my vote here? I said I was SRing Tchill before voting them?In post 952, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:You destroyed my town read with a single post. That’s talent.
VOTE: quick
I’m not moving from this until it’s gone. Make it happen.
Why would I joke about the most important thing in life (next to Kim Kardashian's behind, apparently, but that's debatable.)?In post 779, Vecna wrote:Was this post a joke A50? I guess it was right?In post 518, 50 Judge Powers wrote:In post 448, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 400, mastina wrote:I wanted to call FL scum for this post so I'm going to locktown him for it instead.In post 67, Flavor Leaf wrote:Oh damn, what did I sign up for? Idk how to play setups like this
This is a scum pocket attempt.
VOTE: MastinaOh, God! FL is scum with mastina and the town has lost this one already. Can I please get infected at some point? I mean, not on N1 .. but some time sown the road, maybe?
Then why didn’t you vote until after it became viable?In post 1028, Quick wrote:Okay, what is so bad about my vote here? I said I was SRing Tchill before voting them?In post 952, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:You destroyed my town read with a single post. That’s talent.
VOTE: quick
I’m not moving from this until it’s gone. Make it happen.
I explained that as well. Perhaps you should ISO me?In post 1032, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Then why didn’t you vote until after it became viable?In post 1028, Quick wrote:Okay, what is so bad about my vote here? I said I was SRing Tchill before voting them?In post 952, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:You destroyed my town read with a single post. That’s talent.
VOTE: quick
I’m not moving from this until it’s gone. Make it happen.
Because no one wanted to vote for worthless spots...In post 1035, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Stop it. Stop saying “ISO me”. I’ve done that already. You didn’t explain anything. If you were suspicious of tchill why did you wait until other people voted him for you?
IDK maybe I voted Tchill BEFORE this? But then I thought Wolfie would be a better place to go, in which case, that doesn't help your case much!In post 930, Quick wrote:Much Big! Very Wow! Amazipantz! Good stuff! Have my baby!In post 905, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Look at this galoombaIn post 842, Quick wrote:VOTE: Jake the Wolfie
Let's pressure this slot and see if they have any playing ability?
Yeah, you can die.
Uh ok. So Jake had more votes than tchill is that what you’re saying?In post 1037, Quick wrote:IDK maybe I voted Tchill BEFORE this? But then I thought Wolfie would be a better place to go, in which case, that doesn't help your case much!In post 930, Quick wrote:Much Big! Very Wow! Amazipantz! Good stuff! Have my baby!In post 905, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Look at this galoombaIn post 842, Quick wrote:VOTE: Jake the Wolfie
Let's pressure this slot and see if they have any playing ability?
Yeah, you can die.
IDK. I wasn't even paying attention to how many votes were on Wolfie at the time. I just saw like one of their posts early in the game and thought, "this slot is junk" so voted it. So basically, you have no case because I either vote Tchill who I was SRing or I am voting for a worthless slot. IDK what your case is besides that, but you are clearly thinking I am a better player than I really am.In post 1038, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Uh ok. So Jake had more votes than tchill is that what you’re saying?In post 1037, Quick wrote:IDK maybe I voted Tchill BEFORE this? But then I thought Wolfie would be a better place to go, in which case, that doesn't help your case much!In post 930, Quick wrote:Much Big! Very Wow! Amazipantz! Good stuff! Have my baby!In post 905, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Look at this galoombaIn post 842, Quick wrote:VOTE: Jake the Wolfie
Let's pressure this slot and see if they have any playing ability?
Yeah, you can die.
Because, as I said, people were SPLIT on him, which generates INFO.In post 1042, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:What is a “worthless slot” then? If you weren’t paying attention to how many votes were out why did it matter whether tchill had a wagon or not?
Also I don’t get this comment. From my understanding the scum still get a nk... and twice they can also kill an infected person. Is that wrong?In post 1036, Quick wrote:Because no one wanted to vote for worthless spots...In post 1035, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Stop it. Stop saying “ISO me”. I’ve done that already. You didn’t explain anything. If you were suspicious of tchill why did you wait until other people voted him for you?
And worthless spots are bad in this game because there are not many NKs.
"not many" does not mean "none". I am a lot more careful with the language I use than mastina is.In post 1044, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Also I don’t get this comment. From my understanding the scum still get a nk... and twice they can also kill an infected person. Is that wrong?In post 1036, Quick wrote:Because no one wanted to vote for worthless spots...In post 1035, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Stop it. Stop saying “ISO me”. I’ve done that already. You didn’t explain anything. If you were suspicious of tchill why did you wait until other people voted him for you?
And worthless spots are bad in this game because there are not many NKs.
What does that’s have to do with you deciding not to vote a scumread?In post 1043, Quick wrote:Because, as I said, people were SPLIT on him, which generates INFO.In post 1042, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:What is a “worthless slot” then? If you weren’t paying attention to how many votes were out why did it matter whether tchill had a wagon or not?
Tchill was a SR? Not sure I get you at this point. It looks like you are reaching for a case that isn't there.In post 1047, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:What does that’s have to do with you deciding not to vote a scumread?In post 1043, Quick wrote:Because, as I said, people were SPLIT on him, which generates INFO.In post 1042, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:What is a “worthless slot” then? If you weren’t paying attention to how many votes were out why did it matter whether tchill had a wagon or not?
Ok but “not many” implies “less than expected”, and it seems to me this game actually gets 2 MORE nightkills than expected. Just trying to understand.In post 1046, Quick wrote:"not many" does not mean "none". I am a lot more careful with the language I use than mastina is.In post 1044, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Also I don’t get this comment. From my understanding the scum still get a nk... and twice they can also kill an infected person. Is that wrong?In post 1036, Quick wrote:Because no one wanted to vote for worthless spots...In post 1035, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Stop it. Stop saying “ISO me”. I’ve done that already. You didn’t explain anything. If you were suspicious of tchill why did you wait until other people voted him for you?
And worthless spots are bad in this game because there are not many NKs.