Mafiascum.net

Maybe we shoulda just massclaimed all this cryptic food talk has me thinking about dinner

In post 1021, OutWorldER wrote:

In post 984, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 978, OutWorldER wrote:Sell me on your NPOM TR

Like do you think he's posting with an agenda? I don't see it at all. Not making much sense isn't really a crime

His votes constantly seem very opportunistic? The few times he wasn't moving to big wagons, he was putting votes on slots that were somewhat contentious. Every time a wagon gained any sort of traction, he moved there, with very weak reasoning.

It feels exactly like newbscum wanting to coast by.

@MathBlade, I'll also accept you talking to me about NPOM.

In post 1024, Titus wrote:

In post 1022, MathBlade wrote:Alas now you’re probably scum. You coulda just townread me

But your crumbs don’t fit with my role very well.

That’s too much PR isn’t it?

I haven't been baking.

Bullshit. And SB would be too much town power too.

I am pretty sus of almost any PR left.

Yeah my sus is scummy whatcha gonna do about it.

In post 1019, Titus wrote:

In post 1016, Flavor Leaf wrote:As soon as Math and Johnny get in the game, Super Bowl and NPOM heat got split up, and it put heat on both their slots, splitting the heat needed to bake someone. That’s a scum tactic, i just don’t know who’s taking advantage of town.

Can you rephrase this?

Right when Blade along with Fararr replaces into this area, the current wagon, and the loud one’s coals received less pressure due to the pressure getting shared with the others.

I mention it in my scum guide, as scum, when a scum is under big fire, a great way to deal with it is to make a lot of noise elsewhere, so that either people will follow your read, or they’ll vote you, leaving wagons to stagnate, and protects scum because they can’t get the votes needed to fade.

It’s a scum advantage most people don’t actively do, they subconsciously do it, and then the response happened, but they just roll with the punches rather than expecting it, but knows they succeeded. Does this make sense?

Out of world short version is there’s an underlying gambit here I am trying to expose but not sure how.

If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

yeah i support massclaim

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

In post 1030, Battle Mage wrote:yeah i support massclaim

Bet you do.

Not happening.

In post 1027, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 1019, Titus wrote:

In post 1016, Flavor Leaf wrote:As soon as Math and Johnny get in the game, Super Bowl and NPOM heat got split up, and it put heat on both their slots, splitting the heat needed to bake someone. That’s a scum tactic, i just don’t know who’s taking advantage of town.

Can you rephrase this?

Right when Blade along with Fararr replaces into this area, the current wagon, and the loud one’s coals received less pressure due to the pressure getting shared with the others.

I mention it in my scum guide, as scum, when a scum is under big fire, a great way to deal with it is to make a lot of noise elsewhere, so that either people will follow your read, or they’ll vote you, leaving wagons to stagnate, and protects scum because they can’t get the votes needed to fade.

It’s a scum advantage most people don’t actively do, they subconsciously do it, and then the response happened, but they just roll with the punches rather than expecting it, but knows they succeeded. Does this make sense?

This would suggest more a BM and NPOM team.

In post 1031, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

I'm not either. No big plans. So if you see a gambit from me, you can ruin it.

We’re elimming SB then tomorrow if y’all wanna claim that’s fine.

But there’s no reason to mass claim when it won’t change the elim

FWIW, I agree with Math's thinking here. I'm not sure if it's right, but I see where he's coming from.

In post 1031, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

I am always involved in the gambit.

In post 1032, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1030, Battle Mage wrote:yeah i support massclaim

Bet you do.

I sure do.

In post 1034, Titus wrote:

In post 1031, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

I'm not either. No big plans. So if you see a gambit from me, you can ruin it.

Okay then
Scum SB visits Titus to give her fruit to either legitimize SB or Titus or both
Titus’s reaction expecting two kills instead of one means SK and scum probably have a doc to prevent SK or vig kill
Titus doesn’t want SB or BM elimmed but wants to look weak and hopeless and no one listens to me and coast to end game.

Titus has been trying to hint doc/rb for a while

Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 1031, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

I am always involved in the gambit.

But are you also baking? (I've lost all the metaphors)

In post 1039, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1034, Titus wrote:

In post 1031, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

I'm not either. No big plans. So if you see a gambit from me, you can ruin it.

Okay then
Scum SB visits Titus to give her fruit to either legitimize SB or Titus or both
Titus’s reaction expecting two kills instead of one means SK and scum probably have a doc to prevent SK or vig kill
Titus doesn’t want SB or BM elimmed but wants to look weak and hopeless and no one listens to me and coast to end game.

Titus has been trying to hint doc/rb for a while

dude, if you're going to basically drop loaves that you and Titus are both PRs, are we losing anything by pinning everyone down to a claim?

I will say the fruit claim pinged me too, but i don’t see why Titus as town wouldn’t claim fruit.

But yes, fruit gambits are solid, I’ve played a few myself as scum.

I don’t hate Math’s take on it, tbh

In post 1041, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1039, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1034, Titus wrote:

In post 1031, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

I'm not either. No big plans. So if you see a gambit from me, you can ruin it.

Okay then
Scum SB visits Titus to give her fruit to either legitimize SB or Titus or both
Titus’s reaction expecting two kills instead of one means SK and scum probably have a doc to prevent SK or vig kill
Titus doesn’t want SB or BM elimmed but wants to look weak and hopeless and no one listens to me and coast to end game.

Titus has been trying to hint doc/rb for a while

dude, if you're going to basically drop loaves that you and Titus are both PRs, are we losing anything by pinning everyone down to a claim?

Titus already outed I am a PR anyway. The risk was null. Much more important we elim SB and probably BM. I die 1-2 scum gone #worth

BM, usually you’ve been obv town for me, and here you’re neutral town at best.

I’m noting this for post game if you end up being scum.

In post 1039, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1034, Titus wrote:

In post 1031, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

I'm not either. No big plans. So if you see a gambit from me, you can ruin it.

Okay then
Scum SB visits Titus to give her fruit to either legitimize SB or Titus or both
Titus’s reaction expecting two kills instead of one means SK and scum probably have a doc to prevent SK or vig kill
Titus doesn’t want SB or BM elimmed but wants to look weak and hopeless and no one listens to me and coast to end game.

Titus has been trying to hint doc/rb for a while

Uhh, at no point did I expect two kills.
At no point did I ever hit at doctor or roleblocker, and that would be pretty dumb to do.

Math, are you a Mason?

In post 1041, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1039, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1034, Titus wrote:

In post 1031, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1029, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were gambited, I’d be conf town by now and y’all would be questioning it, but still likely not do much about it until a few days.

You’re not involved in the gambit

I'm not either. No big plans. So if you see a gambit from me, you can ruin it.

Okay then
Scum SB visits Titus to give her fruit to either legitimize SB or Titus or both
Titus’s reaction expecting two kills instead of one means SK and scum probably have a doc to prevent SK or vig kill
Titus doesn’t want SB or BM elimmed but wants to look weak and hopeless and no one listens to me and coast to end game.

Titus has been trying to hint doc/rb for a while

dude, if you're going to basically drop loaves that you and Titus are both PRs, are we losing anything by pinning everyone down to a claim?

I think Titus was setting up to claim a PR later. She didn’t expect redacted

I have my own theory.

In post 1046, Flavor Leaf wrote:Math, are you a Mason?

Like the Southern Jar.

Told you I am not getting mis elimmed.

No room for any more PRs.

Also told you I am dying tonight.