I agree the cost/benefit analysis is worth thinking through. I also think that this all paints math as pretty town as why would you fake a guilty to then be open to letting someone off the hook.In post 1010, cassowary wrote:I... see where you're coming from but I feel like there's no scenario where we don't end up needing to eliminate grendel at some point.
I'm wondering what's the cost/benefit on "give him a chance and vote him out tomorrow if he doesn't follow through".
I mean in the worst case scenario grendel is scum vig and offs another townie tonight, them we kill him tomorrow? Do the numbers on that look even remotely favorable for town to the extent that it's worth it to risk that scenario?
I guess worst worst case scenario is that grendel is a scum vig and he shoots grey or titus or someone tonight at your urging, he goes "oh oops guess we were wrong" but manages to pass himself off as townie. I kinda think in that scenario we have to eliminate him no matter what, so we might as well get it over with today. Not convinced it's worth it to let him live. Sorry grendel :'( but I'm open to being convinced otherwise, I guess.
Replacing inactive players like NK15 will help as a lot of the player posting regularly feel like townbloc to me.