Mafiascum.net

Ole Gunnar Weebskjær is definitely scum, take my word for it

But outside of that, you had a strange reaction to being asked if you post a lot as Scum also, where you totally dismissed it only to have Mini call out a game where you were the top poster as Scum.

In post 884, MiniMegabyte wrote:

In post 871, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 856, MiniMegabyte wrote:

In post 853, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 851, Gamma Emerald wrote:Can you link some scumgames where you posted a lot?

Uhhhh...
Tbh i don't think i have any.

You do ...

Which games are you thinking about?
I, like you. Wasn't very active in the newbie we had.
So where did you gain the info that i can also be active as scum?

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=84696 you had the most posts in the game

And I could also argue that your reads have been extremely malleable depending on the situation. I mean Ranny was Scum until they weren’t, until they were again. Same with Mini - Scum until they’re not. I could pull up the posts but you get the idea.

I just don’t think it’s a completely ridiculous position.

What on earth is this absolute garbage tier shit posting.



Absolute rubbish. This is considered allowed play?

VOTE: Not_Mafia

.

Is that a hammer?

I guess Not_Mafia’s self-vote isn’t completely obvious - I’m not sure it counts as a legitimate vote.

In post 1027, Hayker wrote:What on earth is this absolute garbage tier shit posting.

vote:not_mafia

Absolute rubbish. This is considered allowed play?

Also, you’re like completely absent until now?

this is flipping town

In post 1004, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Is Not_Mafia even readable?

Yes.

In post 1030, Andresvmb wrote:I guess Not_Mafia’s self-vote isn’t completely obvious - I’m not sure it counts as a legitimate vote.

It doesn't.

You do know that Not_Mafia is completely willing to self-hammer right? Are you sure you want the day to end now?

In post 1027, Hayker wrote:What on earth is this absolute garbage tier shit posting.

vote:not_mafia

Absolute rubbish. This is considered allowed play?

Whats scummy about it that you moved your vote there?

VOTE: Plusjoyed

Actually I want to see something from this slot.

That Hayker vote is Scummy like anything I’ve ever seen.

Gamestate just declared not_mafia town. The fact hes at hammer distance this fast with no real cooperation between townies shows it.
Town are just voting bc of playstyle dislike and scum are piling on.

Hayker was reading enough to comment on Not_Mafia’s play, but seems unwilling to share any thoughts on anything else that might be relevant?

I also do want plus to come back and post, which they said they would do today.

Yup I'm town bitches, you're not getting rid of me just yet

In post 1031, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1027, Hayker wrote:What on earth is this absolute garbage tier shit posting.

vote:not_mafia

Absolute rubbish. This is considered allowed play?

Also, you’re like completely absent until now?

I really joined this game a bit prematurely. I just moved the other week and have been stupidly busy ever since. It's finally dying down at this point thankfully. Perhaps I should have issued a V/LA.




I agree we shouldn't let him self hammer. Though with all the posts that have occurred since I started this I don't think at e-1 anymore anyways.

Moving my vote onto an immensely distracting spot is scummy?

Now let's eliminate scum Norweegaboo

Voting people for being annoying is an easy way to obfuscate not actually scumhunting and is extremely anti-town

In post 1040, Bypasser Catcher wrote:Gamestate just declared not_mafia town. The fact hes at hammer distance this fast with no real cooperation between townies shows it.
Town are just voting bc of playstyle dislike and scum are piling on.

Sometimes this way of thinking is accurate, but it's been a weird slot since the beginning and I could easily see scum distancing themselves from it.

I'm town