Page 42 of 121
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:02 pm
by Solon
In post 1020, Featherless Biped wrote: In post 606, HypoSoc wrote:I haven't really been interested in the Da Dude wagon because I didn't have particular suspicions for that slot, nor did I think flipping it would reveal anything.
But now I am suspicious of MiniMegabyte, and I feel Da Dude flipping scum would all but cinch it.
That said, the Da Dude wagon is evaporating, so maybe I should just vote for my suspicion directly.
VOTE: MiniMegabyte
But, if the Da Dude slot wagon returns, I am happy to swap to it.
that's such an artificial post
Scum voting other scum?
kinda feeling like switching to hypo
Why do you scumread me?
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:03 pm
by Solon
In post 1019, Gretchen wrote: In post 837, HypoSoc wrote:See, yeah, compared to "late activated IC", Novice Detective IS something that makes sense for scum to claim.
Also, it feels like you made the claim pretty early... like, as town it's a role you want to keep secret. You weren't at risk of being hammered immediately (only E-2 at the time you made the claim, if I counted correctly), so why would you give up the town power role's anonymity so quickly?
Edit by way of preview: +1 to April's "frustrated scum" analysis
lmao i want to vote him for this post alone. infact i will do that,
VOTE: HypoSoc
Woah shit there was another one
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:04 pm
by Solon
This wagon feels a little dirty with how quickly it's sprung up, let's try this instead
VOTE: Lotus
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:06 pm
by Solon
In post 1020, Featherless Biped wrote: In post 606, HypoSoc wrote:I haven't really been interested in the Da Dude wagon because I didn't have particular suspicions for that slot, nor did I think flipping it would reveal anything.
But now I am suspicious of MiniMegabyte, and I feel Da Dude flipping scum would all but cinch it.
That said, the Da Dude wagon is evaporating, so maybe I should just vote for my suspicion directly.
VOTE: MiniMegabyte
But, if the Da Dude slot wagon returns, I am happy to swap to it.
that's such an artificial post
Scum voting other scum?
kinda feeling like switching to hypo
Thinking about it, this post actually makes tons of sense from the perspective of biped being HypoSoc's partner
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:21 pm
by Featherless Biped
In post 1025, Solon wrote: In post 1020, Featherless Biped wrote: In post 606, HypoSoc wrote:I haven't really been interested in the Da Dude wagon because I didn't have particular suspicions for that slot, nor did I think flipping it would reveal anything.
But now I am suspicious of MiniMegabyte, and I feel Da Dude flipping scum would all but cinch it.
That said, the Da Dude wagon is evaporating, so maybe I should just vote for my suspicion directly.
VOTE: MiniMegabyte
But, if the Da Dude slot wagon returns, I am happy to swap to it.
that's such an artificial post
Scum voting other scum?
kinda feeling like switching to hypo
Why do you scumread me?
i don't necessarily scumread you directly, like, i'm not a fan of you watlzing in and claiming PR but apart from that i don't have much to say about, it's more about mini's posts, i could try to dig the ones that pinged me if ya want
and in that message, it's more that i felt that Hypo was acting like you'd act with a scumbuddy you see?
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:37 pm
by Dannflor
In post 1027, Solon wrote:This wagon feels a little dirty with how quickly it's sprung up, let's try this instead
VOTE: Lotus
why
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 9:54 pm
by Solon
In post 1023, Solon wrote: In post 985, RLotus wrote: In post 973, geraintm wrote:In post 903, Solon wrote:
I be a TPR! Get off my wagon or be off with thy heads!
really, another day 1 claim. i think i believe about one third of these are true
gretchen and klick are pretty much always the same alignment soo
I don't really see a reason not to believe klick or grethcen. Would klick really run a gambit like that to save his partner? Klick certaintly wouldn't do that as scum to save a town pr. Maybe gretchen happened to fake claim a pr that supposedly synergizes with Klick? Seems doubtful.
Mini's slot claimed in a really weird spot. Doesn't seem natural that they would feel the pressure to claim there. It is also a pretty safe fakeclaim given there are 2 other prs that can die in the night.
I'm scumreding this as well
Btw I didn't even know about the other claims when I made mine. This subtle discrediting shit aint gonna fly
And just generally a lack of townie play. He's made two posts since I replaced in and they've both been underwhelming at best.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:04 pm
by RLotus
In post 1023, Solon wrote: In post 985, RLotus wrote: In post 973, geraintm wrote:In post 903, Solon wrote:
I be a TPR! Get off my wagon or be off with thy heads!
really, another day 1 claim. i think i believe about one third of these are true
gretchen and klick are pretty much always the same alignment soo
I don't really see a reason not to believe klick or grethcen. Would klick really run a gambit like that to save his partner? Klick certaintly wouldn't do that as scum to save a town pr. Maybe gretchen happened to fake claim a pr that supposedly synergizes with Klick? Seems doubtful.
Mini's slot claimed in a really weird spot. Doesn't seem natural that they would feel the pressure to claim there. It is also a pretty safe fakeclaim given there are 2 other prs that can die in the night.
I'm scumreding this as well
Btw I didn't even know about the other claims when I made mine. This subtle discrediting shit aint gonna fly
Wasn't subtle whatsoever.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:09 pm
by Solon
You're making out that it could be scummy without directly calling it scummy - I'd say that was an attempt at being subtle.
I didn't say it was a
good
attempt.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:13 pm
by RLotus
In post 1033, Solon wrote:You're making out that it could be scummy without directly calling it scummy - I'd say that was an attempt at being subtle.
I didn't say it was a
good
attempt.
Fair enough, I'm not near confident enough to call you scum, but if one of the claims is fake it is probably yours.
Do you not see it as strange for someone to claim PR with merely 3 votes on them? Especially considering you apparently hadn't read enough to know about the other claims. Why would you claim without even knowing the context of the game of that point?
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:17 pm
by Solon
I think I've already answered that.
I wasn't willing to let it get to a stage where I'm a compromise elim based on the actions of my predecessor, which is outside of my control. A late claim might not have been believed as this is a closed setup, therefore the best weapon in my arsenal as a Townie was transparency. I play mostly by instinct, and my instinct at that moment told me to claim as I did.
I'd much rather eat a NK than the elim so I'm not too worried.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:19 pm
by Solon
I also thought (and still think) that claiming in the way I did would bring about some interesting reactions, and I believe with some certainty that scum are amongst the few that have tried to quietly discredit my claim.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:26 pm
by RLotus
In post 1035, Solon wrote:I think I've already answered that.
I wasn't willing to let it get to a stage where I'm a compromise elim based on the actions of my predecessor, which is outside of my control. A late claim might not have been believed as this is a closed setup, therefore the best weapon in my arsenal as a Townie was transparency. I play mostly by instinct, and my instinct at that moment told me to claim as I did.
I'd much rather eat a NK than the elim so I'm not too worried.
Yeah you explained it kind of before. My point really is how can you scum read someone criticizing your claim when you claimed in such a sudden and out of place way?
Also, I disagree using your instinct when you haven't read the game yet, but what is done is done.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:28 pm
by RLotus
In post 1036, Solon wrote:I also thought (and still think) that claiming in the way I did would bring about some interesting reactions, and I believe with some certainty that scum are amongst the few that have tried to quietly discredit my claim.
Disagree totally. It is natural in my opinion to question a claim like that. Especially when there are two claims already, town needs to really start evaluating them. You didn't know about the other claims at the time, but yeah. Sure I suppose there can be scum questioning your claim, but personally I'm not reading much into that.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:30 pm
by Solon
I don't scumread those who criticize it, I scumread those who are trying to subtly discredit it. Big difference.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:31 pm
by Solon
In post 1038, RLotus wrote: In post 1036, Solon wrote:I also thought (and still think) that claiming in the way I did would bring about some interesting reactions, and I believe with some certainty that scum are amongst the few that have tried to quietly discredit my claim.
Disagree totally. It is natural in my opinion to question a claim like that. Especially when there are two claims already, town needs to really start evaluating them. You didn't know about the other claims at the time, but yeah. Sure I suppose there can be scum questioning your claim, but personally I'm not reading much into that.
I am the only claimer that has promised hard info Tomorrow, and yet someone said I was the most likely to be lying?
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:35 pm
by Solon
I can't remember who said that now but I'm sure someone did
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:36 pm
by RLotus
In post 1040, Solon wrote: In post 1038, RLotus wrote: In post 1036, Solon wrote:I also thought (and still think) that claiming in the way I did would bring about some interesting reactions, and I believe with some certainty that scum are amongst the few that have tried to quietly discredit my claim.
Disagree totally. It is natural in my opinion to question a claim like that. Especially when there are two claims already, town needs to really start evaluating them. You didn't know about the other claims at the time, but yeah. Sure I suppose there can be scum questioning your claim, but personally I'm not reading much into that.
I am the only claimer that has promised hard info Tomorrow, and yet someone said I was the most likely to be lying?
Promising information does not absolve you from being a fake claim, no.
Do you not see/agree with the logic in that post?
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:43 pm
by Solon
I didn't say I was absolved.
There is no logic behind saying I'm the
most
likely claimer to be lying.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:47 pm
by RLotus
In post 1043, Solon wrote:I didn't say I was absolved.
There is no logic behind saying I'm the
most
likely claimer to be lying.
Considering gretchen and klick linked themselves together if they are scum and the spot in which you claimed, I do think there is logic to you being the most likely liar.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:51 pm
by Solon
I don't believe gretchen linked her role to Klick's? I have also linked mine to Gretchen's before I even knew of Klick's soft.
Obviously the IC claim is the most likely to be a lie.
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:54 pm
by Solon
And while I
think
gretchen is telling the truth based on my own role, I'm far from certain as I don't know much about how roles are usually linked in these games
Anyway, I feel as though this discussion is becoming increasingly redundant
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:50 am
by geraintm
In post 999, clidd wrote:Gera is acting the same as town!Gera our past game in the sense of confusing reads and bad logic.
I see no reason to think that he is scum here.
i am very confused this game. i cant make head nor tale of today, i keep getting whiplash looking at the thread overnight
you dont like the people on it?
see, whiplash ^^^
In post 1027, Solon wrote:This wagon feels a little dirty with how quickly it's sprung up, let's try this instead
VOTE: Lotus
more whiplash
there feels like so much jumpng around scum are having a field day, knowing a crappy elimination is coming but because everyone was in on it is like poiret on the train, everyone could be the murderer...
i cannot see myself anyone who has jumed out today to be especially scummy. tomorrow it may be clearer but today, nope.
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 4:48 am
by bugspray
i need to yeet ppl that i tr for nonlogical associatecs that are so ephemeral i dont rememebr them a day later
vc pls
Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:54 am
by Featherless Biped
In post 1036, Solon wrote:I also thought (and still think) that claiming in the way I did would bring about some interesting reactions, and I believe with some certainty that scum are amongst the few that have tried to quietly discredit my claim.
and who do you consider as the "few"?