Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:49 am
Page 42 of 251
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:52 am
1. Traitors are usually equipped with bulletproof to avoid swing.
2. Traitor knows scum identity but scum doesn't know traitor, so crumbing is necessary.
2. Traitor knows scum identity but scum doesn't know traitor, so crumbing is necessary.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:53 am
also according to wiki, scum team is typically informed that traitor exists.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:55 am
I don't know if my heart could handle another taylor swift traitor event.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:58 am
VOTE: t3
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:02 pm
Give it a try. At least we won't get another unnecessary claim.
VOTE: T3
VOTE: T3
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:04 pm
Cabd who do you think is scum?
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:11 pm
You know, I was pretty sure I was going to be walking into the thread, and voting you before I saw what happened in my absence.
Now? I'm not really sure. I need a few hours to think about what went down around the kitty wagon and re-read the key players, as well as think about the T3 traitor angle stuff.
Now? I'm not really sure. I need a few hours to think about what went down around the kitty wagon and re-read the key players, as well as think about the T3 traitor angle stuff.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:15 pm
how would bulletproof targeted by nked babysitter interact? it'd protect them right?
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:19 pm
what was/is your case on me?In post 645, Cabd wrote:I don't tend to make votes widely, I much prefer to holster until I am voting somebody I really WANT to vote, HARD.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:27 pm
150% no case other than gutping feels.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:34 pm
and that's enough to make you almost want to vote somebody you *checks notes* really WANT to vote, HARD?
interesting...
interesting...
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 12:37 pm
Yeah. It's comparable to my vote on bell in the aforementioned taylor swift game.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:22 pm
At least I didn't dream about it this time?
Weird angle here man.
Weird angle here man.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:30 pm
They look like mafia, and they seemed like a better vote than the alternative (cabd) at the time.In post 793, Rathe wrote:y do u think kitty is mafiaIn post 640, Dunnstral wrote:Kitty is a fine vote, we shouldn't be voting for Etine post-claim imo
I believe it is mechanically correct to at least postpone the elimination for one day, even if we don't really believe kitty.In post 818, KittyTacky wrote:I was a Town 1-Shot Cop. Crumbed it here:
I am an 1-Shot Cop. Crumbed it here:I would check Cabd if he was not limmed today. Now that goes down the drain.In post 686, KittyTacky wrote:Cabd's posts are weird. Almost like active lurking. We should investigate.
VOTE: Cabd
It's best to eliminate someone who is neutra in regards to kitty (so they can be scum whether kitty is town or scum)
UNVOTE: Kitty
I don't agreeIn post 911, T3 wrote:Enchan. Literally. Scumslipped. With. Kitty.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:36 pm
The argument shouldn't be whether kitty is scum or not
It should be about why we can't elim them tomorrow instead of today
It should be about why we can't elim them tomorrow instead of today
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:38 pm
How so?In post 1022, WindowsXP wrote:traitor claim?In post 1011, T3 wrote:ugh you know what
vote kitty
if kitty isn't scum vote me tomorrow i'm just a 1 shot bulletproof and after everyone RANDOLY scumreading it's not like mafia will ever try to kill me
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:38 pm
NDmath feels very stiff this game and I don't really agree with some of the things he saysIn post 1003, NDMath wrote:Agree That Enchant/Kitty appear scum/scum. I'm struggling to wrap my mind around a townie who wants to trick people into quickhammering before the claim but doesn't stick with that goal after the claim. I have mixed thoughts on the claim itself though.
Spoiler: these two posts are the worst of the bunch
Scumreading Samantha and Anya more now for similar reasons. In particular I don't see 704 as at all a scummy post. They've each had quite static and unexpansive reads for the amount they've posted, though this applies moreso to sam. ie 976 "Kitty's reaction bad" and "No scumslip", neither of these are even plausibly gonna change anyone else's opinions, and there's nothing for either Kitty or T3 to argue with.
I'm townreading kerset now, the fake hammer test (845 and 846) is something that comes from town. Specifically because of how straightforward and not overdone it was.
VOTE: samantha97
So, scumlean
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Why did T3 role claim though?
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:41 pm
scummyIn post 1036, Save The Dragons wrote:and that's enough to make you almost want to vote somebody you *checks notes* really WANT to vote, HARD?
interesting...
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:42 pm
Unfortunately (?) that's not really a reason to scumread meIn post 1014, Marky Mark wrote:Minimal analysis/scrutiny this game outside of their push on STD, a slot that I'm townreading. Decent amount of lurking and mechtalk and the #8 slot vote on kitty without much in the way of context or follow-up.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:46 pm
I was told to move my vote off of save the dragons.In post 1015, Marky Mark wrote:Correction - Dunn was #6 slot on Kitty wagon. Clearly, I can't count. The general logic still stands, although this does downgrade that element of their scumminess to an extent.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:48 pm
Hey guys. I've been not feeling well due to the COVID shot I got so I need to declare a V/LA.
I apologize for that inconvenience and eventually I'm just gonna reread and post a big wall on every player. Promise!
I apologize for that inconvenience and eventually I'm just gonna reread and post a big wall on every player. Promise!
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:49 pm
Just wanted to say I approve of T3 votes, even if mine is kinda old by now.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 1:52 pm
yeah it was scummy of cabd good pointIn post 1044, Dunnstral wrote:scummyIn post 1036, Save The Dragons wrote:and that's enough to make you almost want to vote somebody you *checks notes* really WANT to vote, HARD?
interesting...