Mafiascum.net

I'm pretty sure the point was that Nero said Titus was lurking, someone later said he said it after she went V/LA and he said no I didn't and then there are an argument about it. What am I missing?

The point is that I was accusing you of being lurky b4 you went v/la but when you got back you tried to make it seem like I said you were lurking b/c you were v/la and this wasn't true. peta is so tunneled that he believes you and doesn't care what actually happened in the thread.

lurky titus=scum titus

In post 1021, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 1018, VFP wrote:What do you expect when you say the same as DGB a couple of post after?

are you kidding me
My posts was literally 2 minutes after hers, I was typing my message up as she was posting hers and it came in the pedit
we don't even say the same thing
Frankly on top of that being stupid logic, I find it greatly insulting

Yes, I too get insulted when I'm accused of lying or being manipulative in a game of manipulation.
Should I town read posts like these?

You're also going away from my main point of Nero being town.
But I understand that it's hard to create further fake reasons to get me on side.

There is nothing about town from what you are doing, and I'll tell you now, AtE is NAI to me so we can stop act here since we both know there's nothing to be insulted over here.

V/LA / lurking aside I don't see this as town Titus.

In post 1027, VFP wrote:

In post 1021, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 1018, VFP wrote:What do you expect when you say the same as DGB a couple of post after?

are you kidding me
My posts was literally 2 minutes after hers, I was typing my message up as she was posting hers and it came in the pedit
we don't even say the same thing
Frankly on top of that being stupid logic, I find it greatly insulting

Yes, I too get insulted when I'm accused of lying or being manipulative in a game of manipulation.
Should I town read posts like these?

You're also going away from my main point of Nero being town.
But I understand that it's hard to create further fake reasons to get me on side.

There is nothing about town from what you are doing, and I'll tell you now, AtE is NAI to me so we can stop act here since we both know there's nothing to be insulted over here.

When people try to reduce the majority of my posts and votes to "someone else did it before so you're scum" I am pissed

also your logic about nero is faulty because for a good portion of the game people were townreading him
when scums get townread they allow themselves to do things they wouldn't otherwise do, like taking grand stances about things and doing scummy things like misrepping posts which is the vast majority of his ISO
are you going to ignore the entirety of his interactions because you liked one of them?

i am not fucking misrepping anyone

You've spent the large amount of your time trying to misrep multiple slots in this game and they've all reacted to it, bad luck for you.

In post 1030, nomnomnom wrote:also your logic about nero is faulty because for a good portion of the game people were townreading him
when scums get townread they allow themselves to do things they wouldn't otherwise do, like taking grand stances about things and doing scummy things like misrepping posts which is the vast majority of his ISO
are you going to ignore the entirety of his interactions because you liked one of them?

My logic is from before, during, and after town reading.
Also, I'm not sure many players have been vocal on Nero being town rather than just Nero not being scum.
Nero hasn't changed during the game, so my question is, why now is this scum Nero rather than the start of the day?

You can explain to me why I'm wrong if you like, I am a reasonable player and I'll consider what's provided. I just don't feel you have anything you genuinely believe here.
Point out these parts that I'm ignoring and I'll give my opinion.

crying misrep doesn't mean it is a misrep. Its an ez defense to make as scum and only you and peta are the ones that are claiming misrep. DGB is just shadowing scum.

In post 1033, VFP wrote:

In post 1030, nomnomnom wrote:also your logic about nero is faulty because for a good portion of the game people were townreading him
when scums get townread they allow themselves to do things they wouldn't otherwise do, like taking grand stances about things and doing scummy things like misrepping posts which is the vast majority of his ISO
are you going to ignore the entirety of his interactions because you liked one of them?

My logic is from before, during, and after town reading.
Also, I'm not sure many players have been vocal on Nero being town rather than just Nero not being scum.
Nero hasn't changed during the game, so my question is, why now is this scum Nero rather than the start of the day?

You can explain to me why I'm wrong if you like, I am a reasonable player and I'll consider what's provided. I just don't feel you have anything you genuinely believe here.
Point out these parts that I'm ignoring and I'll give my opinion.

854
You have favored one interaction (Nero siding with DW) over all his interactions this game, and the other interactions are scummy and people have pointed them out.
You're laser focusing on something very small compared to the wider picture of his ISO.

In post 1034, Nero Cain wrote:crying misrep doesn't mean it is a misrep. Its an ez defense to make as scum and only you and peta are the ones that are claiming misrep. DGB is just shadowing scum.

Yes, so anyone that complains that you're blatantly misrepping, nitpicking post wording, and imputing intent that isn't there must be scum in your world.
This isn't town.

thats really not the take away but you do u

You think it isn't but in your world, dbg, peta and me are scums so that's basically what's going on.

In post 1035, nomnomnom wrote:854
You have favored one interaction (Nero siding with DW) over all his interactions this game, and the other interactions are scummy and people have pointed them out.
You're laser focusing on something very small compared to the wider picture of his ISO.

Can you point to me what I'm exactly looking at with 854?
I'm pretty stupid here so I'll need you to explain slowly to what I'm missing.

In post 1039, VFP wrote:

In post 1035, nomnomnom wrote:854
You have favored one interaction (Nero siding with DW) over all his interactions this game, and the other interactions are scummy and people have pointed them out.
You're laser focusing on something very small compared to the wider picture of his ISO.

Can you point to me what I'm exactly looking at with 854?
I'm pretty stupid here so I'll need you to explain slowly to what I'm missing.

855
one post after

I pointed to you the start of my reasoning for scum!nero, all you have to do is read from there

In post 1040, nomnomnom wrote:855
one post after

Where's the mis rep?

I read it as Nero nit picking and looking for reasons not mis rep?

You asked me what's changed, so I provided the post where I changed my opinion and the reasoning for it. The misrep was going on much before, but in itself is not scum indicative.
What's scum indicative is doing a whole bunch of misrep to discredit posters then doing this with your vote.
pedit: "nitpicking wording" would be a valid way to put it, the misrep element is when you nitpick wording and putting words and intents that are not there instead of what I said back then

no, is claiming that by labeling his posting "WTF" b/c I don't like it and think its scummy that im misrepping him

Maybe players are "echoing" each other because their arguments are more convincing than trolling scum.

what am I nitpicking and why is it scummy?

Of course players would agree with each other, if they didn't, we'd only have vanity wagons and no eliminations.

Only scum would shame players in the process of reaching a majority opinion/compromise.