Mafiascum.net

In post 1024, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma

I want to go here for now. Something feels off with Nero/T3/Gamma and I wanna see if and how wagons shift with Gamma thrown in the mix.

Thanks for giving me an excuse.

VOTE: Gamma

In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable

I'll admit my SRs aren't exactly congruent but I waasn't asked to make a full-effort readlist, just to outline where my thoughts are

In post 1020, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1000, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 924, Nero Cain wrote:bc I'm scum reading him he's still scum reading me.

This isn’t the case
I think your scum read on me is bs, which makes you scum
I don’t think you’d actually expect me to struggle to make reads as scum or believe I wouldn’t whiteknight as town

Nero makes BS cases on me in every game, BS Nero cases aren't AI.

when the entire thing feels like it's mired in shit and he should know better I think it is AI

In post 1021, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1013, Gamma Emerald wrote:it was probably a shitty attempt at distancing, based on how convoluted T3's thought process on you looks

I don't think you ever said anything about this. Why not?

because it kinda slowly developed in my head as a thought and I never really had it turn solid until just recently

Uh huh

In post 1016, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 1015, DrippingGoofball wrote:If you're looking for a wagon with a lot of resistance, look no further than Testarossa. If you need a reminder look at my scumputer play-by-play.

You just voted T3 and I'm trying to figure how that factors into what you are saying here. A little help on your reasoning would be great.

I've been burnt with Nero bad town play before. I've also been burnt by Nero good scum play.

In post 996, T3 wrote:

In post 994, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 984, T3 wrote:Also, no it was definitely not too early to tell.

Dude I had made 3 posts when I voted me and then you later argued that I hadn't wall posted yet (0n like page 3 or w/e it was)

That vote was me sheping Roden.

this was the post that turned on the lightbulb of "T3 might have been bussing Nero"

In post 1028, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1016, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 1015, DrippingGoofball wrote:If you're looking for a wagon with a lot of resistance, look no further than Testarossa. If you need a reminder look at my scumputer play-by-play.

You just voted T3 and I'm trying to figure how that factors into what you are saying here. A little help on your reasoning would be great.

I've been burnt with Nero bad town play before. I've also been burnt by Nero good scum play.

I'm guessing this was meant as a response to me

In post 1029, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 996, T3 wrote:

In post 994, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 984, T3 wrote:Also, no it was definitely not too early to tell.

Dude I had made 3 posts when I voted me and then you later argued that I hadn't wall posted yet (0n like page 3 or w/e it was)

That vote was me sheping Roden.

this was the post that turned on the lightbulb of "T3 might have been bussing Nero"

And Nero would fend him off in the game thread?

In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable

I've done plenty so far

Dgb u normally tunnel me while I find scum so u don't get to talk down to me. Also good chance you are scum this game

do you have a reason to think that wasn't the plan? As I see it the roadmap seems to have been "T3 shitpushes Nero, Nero fires back, Nero ends up elevated in the town's eyes because of the bad point brought against him"

In post 1033, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable

I've done plenty so far

okay this is straight-up bullshit

T3 who are your scumreads

In post 1036, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1033, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable

I've done plenty so far

okay this is straight-up bullshit

I started the glorious wagon on that one scum

In post 515, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 448, Shrek wrote:std - i think that StD has come off as kind of lazy tbh??? looking back through his iso he hasnt given anything of substance beyond three gut reads and explaining that they were gut reads, so i would like to see more from him on that.

i play very lazily

this is also a fucking lie, see: mini 2213

Recently I've switched to lazy mode for reasons I cant disclose

But gamma you were agreeing with t3s meta "point" yes you worded it differently but by and large you were agreeing that this wasn't my town game. Not that you offered any evidence or anything

Dwlee is town

See look at all this content I provide

In post 1026, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable

I'll admit my SRs aren't exactly congruent but I waasn't asked to make a full-effort readlist, just to outline where my thoughts are

how exactly does this prove that your reads arent just based on the consensus of what people have been saying

In post 1041, Nero Cain wrote:But gamma you were agreeing with t3s meta "point" yes you worded it differently but by and large you were agreeing that this wasn't my town game. Not that you offered any evidence or anything

Except I absolutely DID offer evidence

In post 375, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 369, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 367, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like I’m more familiar with your relationship with Nero and I also think Nero is scummy
So I’m a bit concerned you’re trying attack Cheeky’s ability to read you two

What is scummy?

It doesn’t carry much of the energy I remember from LN 230 or 231
Both of those games Nero felt very passionate, albeit in different aspects. Here he feels a bit deflated.

Wanna keep hurling shit that won't stick?

and also just because I agreed in the moment doesn't mean he wasn't coming from an informed POV

That's not evidence lol

In post 1037, Save The Dragons wrote:T3 who are your scumreads

Really good question actually. I see you are living up the lazy card.

In post 1043, Shrek wrote:

In post 1026, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1019, Shrek wrote:your proposed four scum is literally just the top 3 wagons + a lurker who has done nothing memorable

I'll admit my SRs aren't exactly congruent but I waasn't asked to make a full-effort readlist, just to outline where my thoughts are

how exactly does this prove that your reads arent just based on the consensus of what people have been saying

Nero was a popular vote previously but seems to have fallen out of favor
StD seems mostly untouched despite being low activity

so no I don't think those are "consensus scumreads"

And is Gamma just asking questions to look busy and inflate their postcount?

In post 1045, Nero Cain wrote:That's not evidence lol

how so?