Mafiascum.net

In post 765, Harvey and Haley wrote:

In post 762, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Speaking of engagement, is this level of activity typical for Haley?

So about that.
My other head took a break from Mafia a few months ago. He was down to give it another go as a hydra since this is my first game in a while as well, but still doesn't feel like playing.
Guess he might read parts of the game if I ask him to, if there's anything specific y'all want I'll ask.

-Harvey

In post 1023, ManateeGal wrote:i mean i shouldnt need to lay out how pagetops specifically arent AI when we have other metrics that make way more sense to determine activity in relation 2 scumminess

In post 1017, ManateeGal wrote:i dont like thors pagetop post but what i dislike more is house's constant signalling about how wrong it is

In post 1028, House wrote:

In post 1023, ManateeGal wrote:i mean i shouldnt need to lay out how pagetops specifically arent AI when we have other metrics that make way more sense to determine activity in relation 2 scumminess

So you agree with me, but hate that i said it?

In post 1030, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 1028, House wrote:

In post 1023, ManateeGal wrote:i mean i shouldnt need to lay out how pagetops specifically arent AI when we have other metrics that make way more sense to determine activity in relation 2 scumminess

So you agree with me, but hate that i said it?

well i think the fact you kept coming back to it after it had happened to signal how wrong it was instead of engaging in other ways feels performative

In post 867, House wrote:

In post 865, Something_Smart wrote:Why, then?

He posted a wall of text in what looks like an effort to be productive without actually contributing to the game.

In post 872, House wrote:

In post 868, Something_Smart wrote:Did it not bother you the first four times he did that?

That shit was setup spec.

I'm less than clueless about setup spec in this game.

Activity theorizing, however, I'm very familiar with. I'm a spammy motherfucker as either alignment and have always been that way, so it's something i see a lot of discussion about.

In post 874, House wrote:

In post 873, House wrote:

In post 869, Something_Smart wrote:Also, if it's an effort to be productive, even if it fails at that, what's wrong with it?

Scum doesn't have motive to contribute to the game, but they have motive to APPEAR to contribute to the game.

Not that one post flips my read of him, it's just disappointing.

Edit

In post 883, House wrote:

In post 879, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 874, House wrote:Scum doesn't have motive to contribute to the game, but they have motive to APPEAR to contribute to the game.

Sure, but town also has a motive to contribute which in turn makes them appear to contribute. Why do you think it was the appearance of contributing rather than actually contributing?

Already explained.

In post 892, House wrote:

In post 882, Thor Ragnarok wrote:@House: Using my gut combined with stats is when I see the best results for my reads, I've refined this over a long time of playing

I know this.

My point is, the stat you've chosen is irrelevant at best.

As SS pointed out, if activity is what you're after, there's a link at the bottom of every page that shows how many posts every player has made in this thread.

Pagetop spec just fuels pagetop sniping for whatever reasons the players may have, and I'm sure the mods probably won't appreciate that.

In post 928, House wrote:

In post 925, PenguinPower wrote:boop

Oh cool, you're town!

In post 1034, Enchant wrote:Manatee, i think that's sarcasm.

In post 1035, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I've been cooling on the idea that Thor is scum.

I think he's been forming reads in his own way and liked his read on house. I'm also willing to buy that his funposting is town posting.

And MM isn't a bad vote from his point of view.

I'm just unsure where to go at this point.

In post 1037, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1035, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I've been cooling on the idea that Thor is scum.

I think he's been forming reads in his own way and liked his read on house. I'm also willing to buy that his funposting is town posting.

And MM isn't a bad vote from his point of view.

I'm just unsure where to go at this point.

Why not Enchant/H+H?

In post 1038, ManateeGal wrote:@Enchant

well yea obviously but it still reads like performative outrage

In post 1033, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 928, House wrote:

In post 925, PenguinPower wrote:boop

Oh cool, you're town!

house im talking abt these

In post 968, House wrote:*praying flea is vig*

In post 1046, Enchant wrote:Million of flies can't be wrong.