Mafiascum.net

Townies dont vote players who are townies for them.
Ico did it twice, forgeting his own opinion.
Thats it.
I see no good reasons to consider Ico is town.

In post 1018, Selynee wrote:

In post 970, T3 wrote:

In post 966, Wiki wrote:T3 you said this makes sense (andre treads a50), now you say we should run up a50. Does "run up" mean to elim?

It doesn't matter A50's alignment. We should put him to E-1

It's this the game where everyone says weird stuff?

@T3- you have reads that are not tone based?

@Three- Again...there is no reason town would fake a read here. Especially a scum read. So, you should be the first one to want be elim here...and make a case.

PS: Your vote was terrible. Which is...interesting cuz I felt like SF was soft defending you the first part of the game

I...what? Why would I want to be the first one to be eliminated here? And I did make a case, it's gone on for several days now...

Why is my vote terrible? Her slot rolled scum. What's wrong with voting Salsa even though she soft defended me?

Dwlee, Salsa and Datisi defend Ico with no reasons at all.

In post 1024, Wiki wrote:I dont understand why ico is so town for all of you.
I even checked his meta in couple of games. There is a difference.
There are no reason to think ico is solid town.

What is your meta case?

In post 1028, Three wrote:

In post 1024, Wiki wrote:I dont understand why ico is so town for all of you.
I even checked his meta in couple of games. There is a difference.
There are no reason to think ico is solid town.

What is your meta case?

More searching for scums, better reasons, more text and analysis of different options

In post 1011, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 992, Almost50 wrote:

In post 988, Dwlee99 wrote:A50 why not salsa

I dunno. She tried to pocket me, didn't she? I'm glad to accept that pocket for today.

Yeah, pocket the person who also in people’s suspect list..

Uh, yeah, exactly. Pocketing and/or defending a suspicious townie is a common scum tactic.

In post 1021, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1018, Selynee wrote:PS: Your vote was terrible. Which is...interesting cuz I felt like SF was soft defending you the first part of the game

Yes, that's because I thought they also found difficulties to understand your thoughts like me, but now it’s seeming like they're confbiasing you, which is leading to scumread everything you'll say. But, they also said they're experienced player, so I'm not sure if they're scum for confbiasing.

What confbiasing? I scum read some posts of hers a couple days ago, I haven't said much of her other content besides that.

Salsa we both know I'm not scum and that you screwed yourself over by trying to town read me early for town credit. You're just shading me now without committing to any kind of read on me.

In post 1029, Wiki wrote:

In post 1028, Three wrote:

In post 1024, Wiki wrote:I dont understand why ico is so town for all of you.
I even checked his meta in couple of games. There is a difference.
There are no reason to think ico is solid town.

What is your meta case?

More searching for scums, better reasons, more text and analysis of different options

That's...not particularly meta.

In post 1031, Three wrote:

In post 1029, Wiki wrote:

In post 1028, Three wrote:

In post 1024, Wiki wrote:I dont understand why ico is so town for all of you.
I even checked his meta in couple of games. There is a difference.
There are no reason to think ico is solid town.

What is your meta case?

More searching for scums, better reasons, more text and analysis of different options

That's...not particularly meta.

explain

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1011, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 992, Almost50 wrote:

In post 988, Dwlee99 wrote:A50 why not salsa

I dunno. She tried to pocket me, didn't she? I'm glad to accept that pocket for today.

Yeah, pocket the person who also in people’s suspect list..

Uh, yeah, exactly. Pocketing and/or defending a suspicious townie is a common scum tactic.

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1021, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1018, Selynee wrote:PS: Your vote was terrible. Which is...interesting cuz I felt like SF was soft defending you the first part of the game

Yes, that's because I thought they also found difficulties to understand your thoughts like me, but now it’s seeming like they're confbiasing you, which is leading to scumread everything you'll say. But, they also said they're experienced player, so I'm not sure if they're scum for confbiasing.

What confbiasing? I scum read some posts of hers a couple days ago, I haven't said much of her other content besides that.

Salsa we both know I'm not scum and that you screwed yourself over by trying to town read me early for town credit. You're just shading me now without committing to any kind of read on me.

In post 1034, Salsabil Faria wrote:

4 scums + 3 scum-friendly towns =

You are a scum for no explanation why ico is town for you.
You cannot provide reasons. You even cannot imagine them, so your opinion about ico is not real, it is fake.
And you also voted your townies, asking people to elim ppl, who are townies for you.
Only today you at last gave your list of scums: ge, t3...
But it seems like just "no, not me mafia, you mafia, you you you"

In post 1033, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1011, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 992, Almost50 wrote:

In post 988, Dwlee99 wrote:A50 why not salsa

I dunno. She tried to pocket me, didn't she? I'm glad to accept that pocket for today.

Yeah, pocket the person who also in people’s suspect list..

Uh, yeah, exactly. Pocketing and/or defending a suspicious townie is a common scum tactic.

This is the 2nd time you're misinterpreting me, but before clear what I ACTUALLY said, are you agreeing you're scummy? Cause I was defending YOU!

???

You're literally referring to A50 in that post. My name isn't even mentioned there.

In post 1033, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1021, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1018, Selynee wrote:PS: Your vote was terrible. Which is...interesting cuz I felt like SF was soft defending you the first part of the game

Yes, that's because I thought they also found difficulties to understand your thoughts like me, but now it’s seeming like they're confbiasing you, which is leading to scumread everything you'll say. But, they also said they're experienced player, so I'm not sure if they're scum for confbiasing.

What confbiasing? I scum read some posts of hers a couple days ago, I haven't said much of her other content besides that.

Salsa we both know I'm not scum and that you screwed yourself over by trying to town read me early for town credit. You're just shading me now without committing to any kind of read on me.

You're talking like you know my play style.
I'm not committing any kind of reads on you because I'm not sure yet. As an EXPERIENCED player, you SHOULD know that there are 3 types of read: townread, scumread and nullread. You're my nullread atm

No I'm not? I didn't mention play style at all.

...Yes, I know that there are different kinds of reads. What does that have to do with you shading me but then refusing to commit to a read?

In post 1032, Wiki wrote:

In post 1031, Three wrote:

In post 1029, Wiki wrote:

In post 1028, Three wrote:

In post 1024, Wiki wrote:I dont understand why ico is so town for all of you.
I even checked his meta in couple of games. There is a difference.
There are no reason to think ico is solid town.

What is your meta case?

More searching for scums, better reasons, more text and analysis of different options

That's...not particularly meta.

explain

Your meta case seems like it comes down to Ico not talking enough, but you're looking at completed games for reference of that. In comparison, this game is still basically just beginning.

I read those games' iso in the beginning. Dont think im idiot.
Ico has no searching for scums here, this is the fact for god sake.

Ico votes his townies.
This fact is vital.
You cannot ignore this, otherwise you dont know how to play it.

Im talking with walls. Maybe there are just noobs around me. I would easily consider myself as mistaking here, if there were good reasons why ico should be a townie. But there are no reasons for that at all, nobody provides them. So maybe you should kisten to me if you have no any f reasons at all to townread ico?

^listen

In post 1035, Wiki wrote:

In post 1034, Salsabil Faria wrote:

4 scums + 3 scum-friendly towns =

You are a scum for no explanation why ico is town for you.
You cannot provide reasons. You even cannot imagine them, so your opinion about ico is not real, it is fake.
And you also voted your townies, asking people to elim ppl, who are townies for you.
Only today you at last gave your list of scums: ge, t3...
But it seems like just "no, not me mafia, you mafia, you you you"

In post 1036, Three wrote:

In post 1033, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1011, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 992, Almost50 wrote:

In post 988, Dwlee99 wrote:A50 why not salsa

I dunno. She tried to pocket me, didn't she? I'm glad to accept that pocket for today.

Yeah, pocket the person who also in people’s suspect list..

Uh, yeah, exactly. Pocketing and/or defending a suspicious townie is a common scum tactic.

This is the 2nd time you're misinterpreting me, but before clear what I ACTUALLY said, are you agreeing you're scummy? Cause I was defending YOU!

???

You're literally referring to A50 in that post. My name isn't even mentioned there.

In post 1036, Three wrote:

In post 1033, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1021, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1018, Selynee wrote:PS: Your vote was terrible. Which is...interesting cuz I felt like SF was soft defending you the first part of the game

Yes, that's because I thought they also found difficulties to understand your thoughts like me, but now it’s seeming like they're confbiasing you, which is leading to scumread everything you'll say. But, they also said they're experienced player, so I'm not sure if they're scum for confbiasing.

What confbiasing? I scum read some posts of hers a couple days ago, I haven't said much of her other content besides that.

Salsa we both know I'm not scum and that you screwed yourself over by trying to town read me early for town credit. You're just shading me now without committing to any kind of read on me.

You're talking like you know my play style.
I'm not committing any kind of reads on you because I'm not sure yet. As an EXPERIENCED player, you SHOULD know that there are 3 types of read: townread, scumread and nullread. You're my nullread atm

No I'm not? I didn't mention play style at all.

...Yes, I know that there are different kinds of reads. What does that have to do with you shading me but then refusing to commit to a read?

In post 1043, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1036, Three wrote:

In post 1033, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1011, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 992, Almost50 wrote:

In post 988, Dwlee99 wrote:A50 why not salsa

I dunno. She tried to pocket me, didn't she? I'm glad to accept that pocket for today.

Yeah, pocket the person who also in people’s suspect list..

Uh, yeah, exactly. Pocketing and/or defending a suspicious townie is a common scum tactic.

This is the 2nd time you're misinterpreting me, but before clear what I ACTUALLY said, are you agreeing you're scummy? Cause I was defending YOU!

???

You're literally referring to A50 in that post. My name isn't even mentioned there.

There is the proof of your misinterpretation of my post:

A50

said scum!me is trying to pocket them and I replied sarcastically that yeah, scum!me will pocket the person who themselves in people's suspect list. What I meant there is, if scum!me want to pocket someone, that person would be the widely townread person or someone whose trust would be beneficial for scum!me. But here, people don't trust

A50

that much, so there is no point for scum!me to pocket them. And you said scum!me is trying to pocket suspicious townie as a scum tactic aka misinterpretation on Jupiter level

In post 1036, Three wrote:

In post 1033, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1021, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1018, Selynee wrote:PS: Your vote was terrible. Which is...interesting cuz I felt like SF was soft defending you the first part of the game

Yes, that's because I thought they also found difficulties to understand your thoughts like me, but now it’s seeming like they're confbiasing you, which is leading to scumread everything you'll say. But, they also said they're experienced player, so I'm not sure if they're scum for confbiasing.

What confbiasing? I scum read some posts of hers a couple days ago, I haven't said much of her other content besides that.

Salsa we both know I'm not scum and that you screwed yourself over by trying to town read me early for town credit. You're just shading me now without committing to any kind of read on me.

You're talking like you know my play style.
I'm not committing any kind of reads on you because I'm not sure yet. As an EXPERIENCED player, you SHOULD know that there are 3 types of read: townread, scumread and nullread. You're my nullread atm

No I'm not? I didn't mention play style at all.

...Yes, I know that there are different kinds of reads. What does that have to do with you shading me but then refusing to commit to a read?

I said you're my NULLREAD and why you're my nullread also mentioned in the quoted post. Just use the beautiful EYES you have.

In post 1042, Salsabil Faria wrote:Btw, I don't townread ico, never said anywhere.

You defend Ico here after my perfect arguments about Ico, saying im totally wrong and asking people not to listen to me and even to elim me instead of your scumreads (ico). This is too bad for you from my pov:

In post 776, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 761, Wiki wrote:Ico trs: seny,andre,wiki,gamma,datisi,a50, dwlee (firstly he sred him).
Ico's votes: datisi,a50,dwlee,wiki,sely,wiki

Ico is mafia

And what is the logic here?

In post 781, Salsabil Faria wrote:Scum need Wiki to be alive in this game. Scum!GE's buddy attempt isn’t that weird imo. Like Dwlee said, Wiki won't be night killed. So, if they get eliminated in the day phase, scum can use their defending Wiki thing as a way out.

In post 783, Salsabil Faria wrote:I've a better logic: kill Wiki

In post 814, Salsabil Faria wrote:

4 scums + 2 scum friendly towns (if

Dwlee

is town, not sure yet;

Wiki

is destructive town imo) ⇨ town is screwed already

In post 820, Salsabil Faria wrote:Wiki's logic to scum hunt is not helping town ⇨ helping scum

In post 872, Salsabil Faria wrote:Yes! And better to policy them in D1 rather than later.

In post 882, Salsabil Faria wrote:

Listen towns, you want to eliminate me, np! But for the greater good, we should policy

Wiki

today.

UNVOTE: GE

VOTE: Wiki

In post 888, Salsabil Faria wrote:Yes, I agree with you on GE but I don’t want Wiki anymore.

In post 901, Salsabil Faria wrote:I know you're stupid, that's more than enough

Everything of this started after my arguments against your scummy Ico. And all these your posts equal to defending Ico from me. "Dont listen to wiki, he is stupid crazy etc, we should flaswagon him", that is the sense of your posts. You are defending Ico, saying that i am totally wrong and should be elimed.

Yeah, u can be a crazy town. But i cannot believe you are so much crazy after all. I'd better elim you, we have enough rights for mistakes

Place yourself on Ico's slot and think why town Ico treads and votes the same people. There is no townie logics.

But you are arguing with that. With no sense and no explanation at all.

Maybe GE is mafia, but you are digging your own grave so hard, shitposting all of these and defending a person with no reasons

In post 1042, Salsabil Faria wrote:Btw, I don't townread ico, never said anywhere.

AND WHAT IS THIS??? Is it not a defense of ico from you?

In post 952, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 945, Wiki wrote:

In post 941, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 929, Wiki wrote:About ico

Google reevaluate

JUST WRITE IN WORDS YOUR EXPLANATION WHY MY LOGICS IS IDIOT ABOUT ICO.

In post 941, Salsabil Faria wrote:

Google reevaluate

I consider ico a scum 100%.
What should i think about your posts after my arguments about ico?

when i feel like playing mafia but realizing i have to read multiple pages of wiki repeating the same nonsense case over and over

like dude
judging by the last votecount, you haven't convinced anyone except the person who isn't even reading the game

do you genuinely think your spam is protown?