Mafiascum.net

I think Norwee is mafia pissed off for being caught for "wrong" reasons, but i am not sure.

Yeah, I'm gonna need you to because this tunnel on Enchant isn't doing anything for me.

If Enchant would stop methaphorically slinging shit in my face with his piss takes maybe i’d care.

Uh, okay.

I can lurk for 2 days. Like i care.

Yeah, you can ignore Enchant for now.

Focus on the rest of the game please.

See ya after 23 hours 59 minutes 59 seconds

In post 22, Somnus wrote:Nooooo I'm a masochist. Put that vote back on me. I dare you.

In post 26, Somnus wrote:See? Penguin has the right idea. Quitter.

In post 29, Somnus wrote:

In post 28, Bellaphant wrote:VOTE: bbt

Apparently one of has to be mafia now

Oh NOW she's willing to vote him immediately.

Sorry, couldn't help it, Bella

Funny. I tend to town read 'funny', especially early on.

In post 33, Somnus wrote:Hello. Please tell me why you would take that seriously and why it would have any less merit than any other RVS vote.

I actually just really like this move out of RVs. 9/10 I give a day one town read to this slot.

In post 65, Somnus wrote:

In post 63, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 45, Somnus wrote:

In post 38, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It's Enchant.

Likely a fake claim.

I don't particularly like it.

VOTE: Enchant

In post 40, Alianna wrote:Well, I'm a sheep so...

VOTE: Enchant

I don't put much stock in a page 2 claim, especially in this setup, but why would this be scum indicative? Like, is the thought that Enchant decided to fake-claim as mafia here thinking we'd all keep him around just for his alleged Night 5 result? I'm not being snarky here. I'm genuinely curious.

I meant to do my homework and look at if this is the kind of setup where mass-claim even matters at some point or if Day 1/2 PRs are considered more valuable than 4/5, but Youtube was beckoning and 1 video led to 14 and here we are.

I think d2 massclaim is rather common and I don't think it's that bad

Good to know. Sometime within the next couple days, I want to take a quick skim through a handful of the previous games in this setup. I wasn't sure if this is one of those setups where mass-claim at some point tends to give town an advantage.

Like the enchant vibes, talking about doing the background reading.

In post 67, Somnus wrote:I'm going to put my neck out on the line already and say this wagon is a bad idea. To the few of you who were just in Deputy Cultists, Enchant claimed his PR role on Day 1 in that game as well. Granted, it was known that there was exactly one Day 4 Governor, so it's not the exact same situation. But I'm hard opposed to this already.

Mech, but food mech

In post 91, Somnus wrote:

In post 86, Bellaphant wrote:Hi and-ancy!

@somnus, is it? Generally yes, but this enchant, day one elim bait...so even people processing it and saying 'eh let's leave this a day ' is a net positive for scum.

I guess? I mean, there's multiple cops that could check him. I wouldn't want multiple cops wasting their 1-shot on it though.

Still good mech. Reading back, the only think I don't like now Is k wish they'd challenged the enchant vote more at the time,.but the next post is 'i don't like the wagon'.

Also, background reading again. (Deputy) - he's showing be knows you, me, enchant. I dunno, could be a weird scum flex but I doubt it.

OK Bella, I don't see what you're seeing so I guess I'll just put a pin in it for now.

I know! I knew it wouldn't make you go 'yes, aha'. It works for me though.

UNVOTE:

forgot sorry

In post 1021, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm not focused on dead town.

I'm focused on alive scum providing bad reasoning to elim previously alive town that are now dead.

Nancy couldn't address my concerns, I was hoping that you might be able to?

That said, I like the Goldfish stuff.

You are seriously exasperating. You obviously agreed with this so-called “bad reasoning”. Want me to dig up all of your hypocritical posts agreeing with it? Being wrong doesn’t make us scum.

I can’t even have a rational conversation with you. so I won’t bother.

~N

UNVOTE:

Goldfish hasn’t posted anywhere in days, so still don’t know what to make of it. Andante agrees with me on BBT having selective amnesia.

lololol

In post 1012, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Enchant and possibly NM are probably town

Why is this?

I feel like it's quite difficult to explain because of the way they both play.

There have been votes from Enchant that I like at certain points in the game and I take that to mean they're viewing the gamestate the way that I am.

I also have a feeling that scum!Enchant doesn't make so much noise in relation to this Norwegian push and the whole Enchant vs Norwegian thing stinks of town vs town. The slight pause I have is that a lot of people don't seem to have taken a side in the debate? Or maybe they have but just not in the form of voting? I don't know

NM is the same - he has actually made some astute posts and I like a lot of the reads/thoughts he has displayed in thread.

I do have some reservations about NM and I'm not sure what to do about it.

I really like his 649 though.

I'm so disappointed in myself for losing my cool again. I really tried to avoid that.
UNVOTE:

Honestly i've lost so much of my initial motivation now. My goal was to have a fun time and try to have other people have a fun time too. But i clearly failed completely.

Enchant, i'm sorry. I shouldn't have said those things and i regret it.

In post 1023, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I don't feel strongly enough about Norwegian to outright say I town read them but I think I have seen enough to not want to elim there Today.

Fun Times were very different. People are town reading them for the enthusiasm with which Andante pushed Ali believing they had found scum. I am saying that the enthusiasm could equally be applied to scum believing they have found an easy mislim for D1 and pushing hard to secure it.

What do you think about Frog's replacement?

Waiting to see more from them, I didn't particularly like Frog outside of their FT push though.

What are your reads atm, Norwegian?

In post 1036, Fun Times wrote:

In post 1021, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm not focused on dead town.

I'm focused on alive scum providing bad reasoning to elim previously alive town that are now dead.

Nancy couldn't address my concerns, I was hoping that you might be able to?

That said, I like the Goldfish stuff.

You are seriously exasperating. You obviously agreed with this so-called “bad reasoning”. Want me to dig up all of your hypocritical posts agreeing with it? Being wrong doesn’t make us scum.

I can’t even have a rational conversation with you. so I won’t bother.

~N

In post 1037, Fun Times wrote:UNVOTE:

Goldfish hasn’t posted anywhere in days, so still don’t know what to make of it. Andante agrees with me on BBT having selective amnesia.

lololol

VOTE: BBT

You didn’t respond to this.

In post 452, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:

In post 451, Fun Times wrote:LMAOOOOO THAT POP IN.... IM SOLD. ALI SCUM!!!

-Andante

Yeah I have to agree, I really didn't like that either.

In post 491, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:VOTE: Alianna

That's E-1 I believe.

In post 515, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Somnus and Gamma would be great cop checks.

Protect myself or Fun times if Docs.

Thanks.

And all of this goes completely out the window because we’re wrong, I call bullshit.

~Nancy

It's not my fault you can't, or won't, read.

In post 1048, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It's not my fault you can't, or won't, read.

Pot.meet.kettle.

Andante is in agreement with me and you clearly DID in fact AGREE with my so-called “bad reasoning”, so I have to conclude you either don’t believe in what you’re saying or you can’t or won’t read - not only our posts -

but

YOURS

~N