Mafiascum.net

Hiraki needs death is what

↑ Parama wrote:24 hours from now kthx

coming from the laziest ass

on earth

↑ Parama wrote:Hiraki needs death is what

I mean why Zar

↑ Hiraki wrote:

↑ Parama wrote:24 hours from now kthx

coming from the laziest ass

on earth

Yeah and?

And I'm saying Zar over Uber because yes

Furcolow, kanye, elmo - why are you voting Zar?

↑ shos wrote:Furcolow, kanye, elmo - why are you voting Zar?

Have you read the thread or no?

↑ Parama wrote:Yeah if I had to pick between uber and Zar I'd definitely lynch Zar first

FWIW

k, this will become useful once you put your money where your mouth is

↑ Katsuki wrote:No one's yet tell me why we're voting Zar?

you're either illiterate or just completely dumb

...or scum, but etc

↑ charter wrote:We should lynch Hiraki.

no, we're not lynching hiraki today

↑ Katsuki wrote:

↑ Parama wrote:Because we're not voting Hiraki :<

B-b-b-ut.

:/

I'm totally lost this game.

if you're really not joking about being lost then close your eyes and give me your hand and i will let you be part of something awesome

and of course by "hand" i mean "vote"

I did not ask you, Uber. you gave me your reasons, I found them wrong/irrelevant. I want THEIR reasons, if they say they agree to your reasoning so be it, I want THEM to say it tho.

↑ shos wrote:

↑ Vi wrote:

↑ Yosarian2 wrote:Still don't think Zar is scum; the case against him is pretty thin, and

the people on his wagon look like scum

.

How many of them?

Unvote: Yosarian2
Vote: Zar

(L-2)

pressure vote again I guess? *haha*

So that's not funny...

shos 1032 wrote:I fail

...and I agree.

By the way more people (e.g. me) have given reason to vote Zar than UberNin--

shos 1055 wrote:Furcolow, kanye, elmo - why are you voting Zar?

--

Post 1051 made me *twitch*.

If

↑ Vi wrote:
@Zar 996: I don't really see any reason to believe Furcolow is scum atm. But that's not as important as the fact that you claim to think otherwise.

+

↑ Vi wrote:

↑ Zar wrote:Do you think

[Furcolow's]

behavior is pro-town?

I don't see why not.

then explain

↑ Vi wrote:
ITT Zar lets Furcofluff go by without calling it.

ITT Zar is trying his damnedest to make everyone else look scummy and inconsistent. ALL OF A SUDDEN.

Would have been great if he'd been doing that all game, no? Oh wait, now he's under pressure though he HAS to perform.

↑ UberNinja wrote:

↑ Parama wrote:Yeah if I had to pick between uber and Zar I'd definitely lynch Zar first

FWIW

k, this will become useful once you put your money where your mouth is

My mouth is spitting in the face of Hiraki.
Your point?

@Zar 1061 - I see no contradiction. You're not pushing the person you claim to be a more attractive scumread than UberNinja (who happened to have a burgeoning wagon).

↑ Vi wrote:@Zar 1061 - I see no contradiction. You're not pushing the person you claim to be a more attractive scumread than UberNinja (who happened to have a burgeoning wagon).

I never said Furcolow that I had a more attractive scumread on Furcolow. Furcolow seems like an unlynchable target, quite a good d1 investigative prospect, IMO.

I am interested in your reasons for calling him Fluff while claiming his behavior is pro-town though. That's what I want you to explain.

↑ Zar wrote:

↑ Vi wrote:@Zar 1061 - I see no contradiction. You're not pushing the person you claim to be a more attractive scumread than UberNinja (who happened to have a burgeoning wagon).

I never said Furcolow that I had a more attractive scumread on Furcolow. Furcolow seems like an unlynchable target, quite a good d1 investigative prospect, IMO.

I am interested in your reasons for calling him Fluff while claiming his behavior is pro-town though. That's what I want you to explain.

I dunno, you went well out of your way to vote Furcolow over UberNinja.~
And I thought that you going so far out of your way to throw suss at him would mean you would call him out on a fluff post.

Me, I don't mind the Furc. He's been making proactive votes whereas as scum I'd expect him to be completely useless and/or lurky.

I don't see how his votes are pro-active. All he's done is pile up in wagons started by others.

↑ UberNinja wrote:ITT Zar is trying his damnedest to make everyone else look scummy and inconsistent. ALL OF A SUDDEN.

Would have been great if he'd been doing that all game, no? Oh wait, now he's under pressure though he HAS to perform.

Ninjascum I'm still waiting for your grand case.

↑ Zar wrote:I don't see how his votes are pro-active. All he's done is pile up in wagons started by others.

Who was the first person to vote for you in this game? and for that matter, how many times has he tried to start a Vi wagon?

↑ Vi wrote:

↑ Zar wrote:I don't see how his votes are pro-active. All he's done is pile up in wagons started by others.

Who was the first person to vote for you in this game? and for that matter, how many times has he tried to start a Vi wagon?

#1) Me. How long did he push for that after hopping into your wagon?
#2) when did he vote this so-called wagon he wished to start in you? You already had votes piled up.

I'm reading springlullaby in isolation and I'm not entirely sure we're living in the same continuity.

Try looking for the votes in the thread Vi. I'm sure you can spot them?

↑ Zar wrote:

↑ UberNinja wrote:ITT Zar is trying his damnedest to make everyone else look scummy and inconsistent. ALL OF A SUDDEN.

Would have been great if he'd been doing that all game, no? Oh wait, now he's under pressure though he HAS to perform.

Ninjascum I'm still waiting for your grand case.

Pro-tip: You don't need a "grand case" to lynch scum.

You just need them to act like scum. Which you are.

^^ again admits to not having a case.

Really guys?