Mafiascum.net

In post 1049, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:I dislike ZZZX's answer about why he isn't voting. Mostly that he focused specifically on why he isn't voting Charizard rather than explaining why he isn't doing anything with his vote in a more general sense.

But Im probably confirmation biasing at this point.

Snorkel and I officially agree that Titus is town, so if we could not lynch any of these people Today:

PN, Vezok, mastin2, PV, Titus, Doduo, BPC, Mollie***. that'd be fantastic.

YOU asked me why I am not voting charazard?

Yes I did. Snd instead of giving me insight into what you are doing with your vote (nothing) you gave me some really throwaway reasons for not voting Charizard: "Well BC -could- be scum, but Im usually wrong when I think this"
Typically your opinion on the gamestate as a whole should also impact whether or not you want to vote Charizard. The singlemindedness of the response could just be a personality thing, but it also doesn't feel like something a townie who was genuinely unsure what to do with their vote would say.

In post 1051, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Yes I did. Snd instead of giving me insight into what you are doing with your vote (nothing) you gave me some really throwaway reasons for not voting Charizard: "Well BC -could- be scum, but Im usually wrong when I think this"
Typically your opinion on the gamestate as a whole should also impact whether or not you want to vote Charizard. The singlemindedness of the response could just be a personality thing, but it also doesn't feel like something a townie who was genuinely unsure what to do with their vote would say.

That post doesnt make any sense


You asked me WHY AM I NOT VOTING BC

so I told you WHY AM I NOT VOTING BC

and now you are tunneling me for telling you only WHY AM I NOT VOTING BC?

also saying somethings in your fancy english won't help you when I have read it to see its just some bs that was put together with the hopes on confusing me


god you are driving me insane



You are annoyingly weird.

In post 1050, ZZZX wrote:

In post 1049, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:I dislike ZZZX's answer about why he isn't voting. Mostly that he focused specifically on why he isn't voting Charizard rather than explaining why he isn't doing anything with his vote in a more general sense.

But Im probably confirmation biasing at this point.

Snorkel and I officially agree that Titus is town, so if we could not lynch any of these people Today:

PN, Vezok, mastin2, PV, Titus, Doduo, BPC, Mollie***. that'd be fantastic.

YOU asked me why I am not voting charazard?

In post 1051, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:

Yes I did.

Snd instead of giving me insight into what you are doing with your vote (nothing)

you gave me some really throwaway reasons for not voting Charizard: "Well BC -could- be scum, but Im usually wrong when I think this"

Typically your opinion on the gamestate as a whole should also impact whether or not you want to vote Charizard. The singlemindedness of the response could just be a personality thing, but it also doesn't feel like something a townie who was genuinely unsure what to do with their vote would say.

bold is contraction

italic is pure bs

TIL weird and annoying = scum

Also I FOUND A TELL FOR MTD

Will explain momentarily.


AP I agree with your do not lynch list mostly. Also beast is town. Stop being a nub.

- Snork

In post 1054, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:TIL weird and annoying = scum

Also I FOUND A TELL FOR MTD

Will explain momentarily.


AP I agree with your do not lynch list mostly. Also beast is town. Stop being a nub.

- Snork

Really? Ignoring me?

Ignoring you? Was there something I specifically needed to respond to?

- Snork

If it wasn't clear enough from when I said I am doing ISOs right now...



- Snork

In post 1053, ZZZX wrote:

In post 1050, ZZZX wrote:

In post 1049, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:I dislike ZZZX's answer about why he isn't voting. Mostly that he focused specifically on why he isn't voting Charizard rather than explaining why he isn't doing anything with his vote in a more general sense.

But Im probably confirmation biasing at this point.

Snorkel and I officially agree that Titus is town, so if we could not lynch any of these people Today:

PN, Vezok, mastin2, PV, Titus, Doduo, BPC, Mollie***. that'd be fantastic.

YOU asked me why I am not voting charazard?

In post 1051, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:

Yes I did.

Snd instead of giving me insight into what you are doing with your vote (nothing)

you gave me some really throwaway reasons for not voting Charizard: "Well BC -could- be scum, but Im usually wrong when I think this"

Typically your opinion on the gamestate as a whole should also impact whether or not you want to vote Charizard. The singlemindedness of the response could just be a personality thing, but it also doesn't feel like something a townie who was genuinely unsure what to do with their vote would say.

bold is contraction

italic is pure bs

In post 1052, ZZZX wrote:

In post 1051, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Yes I did. Snd instead of giving me insight into what you are doing with your vote (nothing) you gave me some really throwaway reasons for not voting Charizard: "Well BC -could- be scum, but Im usually wrong when I think this"
Typically your opinion on the gamestate as a whole should also impact whether or not you want to vote Charizard. The singlemindedness of the response could just be a personality thing, but it also doesn't feel like something a townie who was genuinely unsure what to do with their vote would say.

That post doesnt make any sense


You asked me WHY AM I NOT VOTING BC

so I told you WHY AM I NOT VOTING BC

and now you are tunneling me for telling you only WHY AM I NOT VOTING BC?

also saying somethings in your fancy english won't help you when I have read it to see its just some bs that was put together with the hopes on confusing me


god you are driving me insane

Vote Guilty Gunsmith

You are annoyingly weird.

Ain't the snork I knew from 322 so far you are.

P-edit: Fine.

Ok Yoda. You've been having a conversation with AP while I'm posting my conclusions from ISOs. Get it straight.

- Snork

In post 1059, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Ok Yoda. You've been having a conversation with AP while I'm posting my conclusions from ISOs. Get it straight.

- Snork

I

freaking


hate


hydras....


(Unless they contain metalsonic because I can know his posting from a freaking mile)


oh and AP should try signing his posts ina while.

In post 1053, ZZZX wrote:

In post 1050, ZZZX wrote:

YOU asked me why I am not voting charazard?

In post 1051, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:

Yes I did.

Snd instead of giving me insight into what you are doing with your vote (nothing)

you gave me some really throwaway reasons for not voting Charizard: "Well BC -could- be scum, but Im usually wrong when I think this"

Typically your opinion on the gamestate as a whole should also impact whether or not you want to vote Charizard. The singlemindedness of the response could just be a personality thing, but it also doesn't feel like something a townie who was genuinely unsure what to do with their vote would say.

bold is contraction

italic is pure bs

The bold is me agreeing with you (that I DID ask you about your lack of BC vote specifically) and then me summarizing your provided reasons for not voting BC. Your English teacher may give you A's, but Im giving you a B for "Better up your scumgame next time" cause there is no contradiction there and its pretty clear you are making no effort to understand my post at all before painting it scummy.

The italics part of my quote is me explaining why I didn't like your response. I guess I don't have a good answer as to WHY its not BS since that is mostly what I feel -I- would do in your situation as town if I were asked to explain my vote.

!Snork

In post 1061, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:

In post 1053, ZZZX wrote:

In post 1050, ZZZX wrote:

YOU asked me why I am not voting charazard?

In post 1051, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:

Yes I did.

Snd instead of giving me insight into what you are doing with your vote (nothing)

you gave me some really throwaway reasons for not voting Charizard: "Well BC -could- be scum, but Im usually wrong when I think this"

Typically your opinion on the gamestate as a whole should also impact whether or not you want to vote Charizard. The singlemindedness of the response could just be a personality thing, but it also doesn't feel like something a townie who was genuinely unsure what to do with their vote would say.

bold is contraction

italic is pure bs

The bold is me agreeing with you (that I DID ask you about your lack of BC vote specifically) and then me summarizing your provided reasons for not voting BC. Your English teacher may give you A's, but Im giving you a B for "Better up your scumgame next time" cause there is no contradiction there and its pretty clear you are making no effort to understand my post at all before painting it scummy.

The italics part of my quote is me explaining why I didn't like your response. I guess I don't have a good answer as to WHY its not BS since that is mostly what I feel -I- would do in your situation as town if I were asked to explain my vote.

!Snork

What does the freaking imply then?

and my As are from exams that are universal and the results are basically approved all around the world atm. But that has nothing to do with this.

How can both heads agree on this clear wording that SHOWS that you are wrong...

We're never wrong.

In post 1065, Snork wrote:We're never wrong.

I just proved it.

When I arrogently say it is wrong then




oh and I am now convinced my vote is in the right place. ...

I think I found something from this back and forth of GG and ZZZX.

To the mason PT

In post 1065, Snork wrote:We're never wrong.

This was a joke.

And I don't even know what you're talking about. What are you saying is wrong?

- Snork

In post 1062, ZZZX wrote:

In post 1061, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:

In post 1053, ZZZX wrote:

In post 1050, ZZZX wrote:

YOU asked me why I am not voting charazard?

In post 1051, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:

Yes I did.

Snd instead of giving me insight into what you are doing with your vote (nothing)

you gave me some really throwaway reasons for not voting Charizard: "Well BC -could- be scum, but Im usually wrong when I think this"

Typically your opinion on the gamestate as a whole should also impact whether or not you want to vote Charizard. The singlemindedness of the response could just be a personality thing, but it also doesn't feel like something a townie who was genuinely unsure what to do with their vote would say.

bold is contraction

italic is pure bs

The bold is me agreeing with you (that I DID ask you about your lack of BC vote specifically) and then me summarizing your provided reasons for not voting BC. Your English teacher may give you A's, but Im giving you a B for "Better up your scumgame next time" cause there is no contradiction there and its pretty clear you are making no effort to understand my post at all before painting it scummy.

The italics part of my quote is me explaining why I didn't like your response. I guess I don't have a good answer as to WHY its not BS since that is mostly what I feel -I- would do in your situation as town if I were asked to explain my vote.

!Snork

What does the freaking

instead you

imply then?

Read those two quotes OUT LOUD

EVERY SINGLE WORD OF THEM

Let me show you how its read....

ffs that was AP. And I don't understand what you are confused about. He asked for solid reasoning and you gave fluffy reasons, if I am reading this right. He's not saying you're scum for answering his question. He's saying you're scum for answering his question badly.

If you're not scum, you're an idiot with reading comprehension problems. You're arguing (bad) semantics and making distractions. This makes you very likely scum and I agree with AP about it.

- Snork

In post 1070, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:ffs that was AP. And I don't understand what you are confused about. He asked for solid reasoning and you gave fluffy reasons, if I am reading this right. He's not saying you're scum for answering his question. He's saying you're scum for answering his question badly.

If you're not scum, you're an idiot with reading comprehension problems. You're arguing (bad) semantics and making distractions. This makes you very likely scum and I agree with AP about it.

- Snork

Whatever. What I am saying is totally valid and my vote is where it belongs. I will go watch a movie or two and get a better mood before analyzing all this stuff again... I stand where I believe I am right. I will not backdown because I am scum read because I know I am town and I know that making my self wo go scum read and lynched for exposing scum is always worth it.

In post 1069, ZZZX wrote:I told you to explain why you are not voting BC but you instead explain why you are not voting BC. Oh Scummy play dodge question much scum.

I told you to explain why you are not voting BC and your response felt oddly short-sighted.

Yes I am reading you as scum over something that did NOT appear in your response and was not something I explicitly asked for:

In post 1049, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:I dislike ZZZX's answer about why he isn't voting. Mostly that he focused specifically on why he isn't voting Charizard rather than explaining why he isn't doing anything with his vote in a more general sense.

But Im probably confirmation biasing at this point.

Snorkel and I officially agree that Titus is town, so if we could not lynch any of these people Today:

PN, Vezok, mastin2, PV, Titus, Doduo, BPC, Mollie***. that'd be fantastic.

In post 898, PeregrineV wrote:Not willing to lynch today:
Majiffy
Titus
Guilty Gunsmith (Snork + AngryPidgeon)
Speedy Saki (Saki + Metal Sonic)
vezokpiraka
Perpetual Nonsense (Bert and SXTLHGaiden)

I'll trade you Majiffy for Mastin, Speedy for Mollie. For today only. Doduo has yet to pop for me, but I can see the potential in Mastin/Mollie.

In post 1072, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Yes I am reading you as scum over something that did NOT appear in your response and was not something I explicitly asked for:

Quote that you asked me about it and I didnt asnwer it.

Oh wait you cant. How sad?