Page 43 of 257
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:59 am
by implosion
In post 1042, Performer wrote:
See what I mean, imp. You don't know NAI yet you know LAMIST. There's something fishy about you . I'm not exactly sure what it is but I'm going to place you in my FoS pile.
See, I thought it was that. But I wasn't sure. So to be sure
I looked it up on the wiki. I also thought I knew what NAI meant (hence asking if it was not alignment indicative, rather than just asking what it was) so I did the same. Guess what happens if you
look up NAI.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:03 am
by Performer
Varsoon, *bats eyelashes* that's a bad vote. Don't make me cry Varsoona.
What in the. ....
Titus I'm curious, what's your read on Varsoon?
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:07 am
by Performer
Lapsa how come Varsoon is a scumread of yours? I found that I agreed with his
705.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:11 am
by Performer
Ugh, only on pg 32. Taking a break and returning to this later. I don't see why Titu is strongly tr on Dunn , Varsoon is against Dunn, I don't like Dunn, yet Titu has a tr on Varsoon. I do have a few tr and only 1 sr , something isn't right. Will come back to this later, maybe the brief off time will spur some thoughts on what's going on this game.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:11 am
by Wake1
—
Mentions
Titus
is hilariously wrong about something (
561), and that
Performer
is a Scumbag. Opines that
Titus
is 'Scum as shit.' Doesn't appear to believe
Titus
is a Mason, either.
I get he doesn't like my play, but that doesn't make him Town or Scum. I'd like him to clarify what exactly Titus was wrong about. Him questioning Titus and her claim makes me feel a little better about him.
—
<10 posts. Finds
Performer
's 'No-Lynch' troubling.
Give me more to work with.
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Wants to vote
implosion
but doesn't, and says
Almost50
's post is bad but doesn't say why (
170). Votes
Zach
with no reason. Has bad vibes from
implosion
, yet doesn't vote him or explains anything. Unvotes
Zach
/says he's better yet doesn't say why. In
840 he chimed in with only one sentence.
I get the feeling that he's lurking and doesn't want to engage. He keeps not explaining anything either, which to me looks like he's not even trying to find Scum.
—
Votes for
sickofit1138
. He's aware of
Titus
' scumminess in
92 and
290. No thoughts on
Agar
. Reaffrims
Nosferatu
's comment that there are bad vibes coming from
implosion
.
I'd like him to post more. Him checking Titus is good, yet I'd like to better understand the bad vibes comment about implosion. Not willing to vote at the moment.
—
—
—
—
Likes
Transcend
and
implosion
(
75). Doesn't explain why he dislikes my interaction with
Titus
. In
185 is unsure whether to heavily Townread or Scumread
Dunnstral
. Votes
Dunnstral
and says every time he posts he dislikes
Dunnstral
less and less—yet again no explanation (
547). Is also betting
Dunnstral
is Scum and is looking for Towncred should
Titus
be lynched.
Like with Nosferatu, he doesn't seem to explain anything. His posts are empty of content. I'd like to know why he shifted against Dunnstral. For now I'd be OK with him being lynched today.
—
—
—
—
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:16 am
by Titus
In post 1051, Performer wrote:Varsoon, *bats eyelashes* that's a bad vote. Don't make me cry Varsoona.
What in the. ....
Titus I'm curious, what's your read on Varsoon?
It's not a tr, just a bad vote. Varsoona isn't posting because of RL as he's not posting much in other games. Varsoon is really good at town when he gets going. I don't see what a pressure vote on Varsoona does since his lurking is IRL oriented and there are actual scummy people in the thread to lynch.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:21 am
by Wake1
In post 1049, AGar wrote:Wake is fine, but so help me god if we have a repeat of Gundam I will smite you so fucking hard.
Well, if a Serial Kills pops up no one had better try to leash the fucker.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:33 am
by Lapsa
well - it's a bad read.
i don't actually know what to think of Varsoon.
kind a null. lurks a lot. similar to nos
i think i put him into scum pool mostly because of that - couldn't remember much
i scumread people by default
consider my null reads:
shannon and boem were both fairly active yet at that point i didn't know what to make out of that
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:13 am
by Transcend
if you believed this, then how come you never added any momentum whatsoever when i tried (and failed) to get some on him?
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:15 am
by Performer
K I'm back for a bit and on pg 34.
OH GREAT.
Titus was that really necessary? I wasn't keeping track of votecount but were you even L-2 or L-1??
---
I somewhat question Varsoon's asking how anyone could possibly see Dunn's play as town; I think even if you see his play as scummy it should be pretty easy to see why people townread him.
imp, explain this to me. How come you questioned Varsoon 's sr on Dunn ? What's your motive for saying that?
---
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:19 am
by Dunnstral
Wake is town but dumb
Zach is possibly town
Transcend is questionable.
Shannon isn't bad enough to vote
Performer town
Agar no clue
Let's rope Sickofit or a50
VOTE: Sickofit
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:23 am
by Transcend
VOTE: sickofitnumbers
gut tells me he's town
but he's been pretty meh so i don't mind adding pressure
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:25 am
by podoboq
OK, I'm gonna go out a huge limb here. Please somebody with significantly more site experience than I look into this.
In Secret Alt Mafia 2, Joey Tribbiani scumslipped by accidentally linking to the Mafia PT. When people clicked the link, they got an error screen that says "You are not authorised to read this topic." This happened because he prepared his wall inside of the Mafia PT, and when he typed (post)74(/post), it linked to the thread he typed it in, not the main thread, where the post he intended to reference lied.
Now it's possible that I'm misunderstanding some of how that works, because I only vaguely know this story from TPP talking about it in Musical Mafia, but I'm seeing the same symptoms of it here. If I'm wrong here, and this is nothing, then sorry I brought it up, we can move on. But if I'm right, and this is the same thing, it's just straight up a scumslip. Like, a real one.
Wake posted a similarly broken url, which leads to a topic I don't have access to:
Here is the slip from Secret Alt Mafia 2. Scroll down to read the explanation of how it's a slip.
Again, apologies if I'm misunderstanding something and this is all nothing.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:27 am
by Dunnstral
VOTE: Transcend
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:28 am
by Transcend
DUN DUN DUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
VOTE: wake
pedit: lol
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:29 am
by Wake1
In post 1062, podoboq wrote:OK, I'm gonna go out a huge limb here. Please somebody with significantly more site experience than I look into this.
In Secret Alt Mafia 2, Joey Tribbiani scumslipped by accidentally linking to the Mafia PT. When people clicked the link, they got an error screen that says "You are not authorised to read this topic." This happened because he prepared his wall inside of the Mafia PT, and when he typed (post)74(/post), it linked to the thread he typed it in, not the main thread, where the post he intended to reference lied.
Now it's possible that I'm misunderstanding some of how that works, because I only vaguely know this story from TPP talking about it in Musical Mafia, but I'm seeing the same symptoms of it here. If I'm wrong here, and this is nothing, then sorry I brought it up, we can move on. But if I'm right, and this is the same thing, it's just straight up a scumslip. Like, a real one.
Wake posted a similarly broken url, which leads to a topic I don't have access to:
Here is the slip from Secret Alt Mafia 2. Scroll down to read the explanation of how it's a slip.
Again, apologies if I'm misunderstanding something and this is all nothing.
As I've been allowed in the past, I've used old PTs of mine that only I have access to to gather my thoughts, collect ISOs, and update my Reads List.
Apparently my Reads List contained a link to that hidden PT. I can't make a new PT, but I can use an old one from my old Large Normal.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:30 am
by Performer
First impression on Titus claim - if she is truth telling - we are screwed big time. Seriously. Masons are important , I recall hosting the only game I hosted so far, where the only PRs were 3 Masons.
---
In post 898, Titus wrote: In post 895, Wake1 wrote: In post 893, Titus wrote:Wake can be vigged. At this point, I have zero desire to rehabilitate Wake (assuming he's town which he may not be) or to get in a long drawn out fight as to why masons are town. Wake's tunnelling on a mason claim based on something that "could be a misunderstanding."
First, you can go on the record saying you've never pulled a Mason gambit.
Second, it sounds like you're saying both you and Dunnstral are Masons.
Third, no one is confirmed unless by the game moderator.
I don't believe I have. I've played so much that I can't remember every single game. So it's possible I forgot, but no I don't believe I have.
Yeah, it sounds like I am. Did you miss the part where I said we were masons?
Blah blah blah.
Wake, though I've never seen Titus pull a fake claim gambit, I wouldn't be surprised if she were pulling one. Regardless, I'm not touching Titus today.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:31 am
by Performer
ebwop: fake claim Mason gambit
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:31 am
by Transcend
UNVOTE:
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:33 am
by Transcend
perf is prob town
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:37 am
by podoboq
In post 1065, Wake1 wrote:As I've been allowed in the past, I've used old PTs of mine that only I have access to to gather my thoughts, collect ISOs, and update my Reads List.
Apparently my Reads List contained a link to that hidden PT. I can't make a new PT, but I can use an old one from my old Large Normal.
That sounds kosher to me. I'll go ahead and just assume it was nothing, then.
If you're telling the truth, which I'll just assume you are, then I'm sorry I brought it up.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:38 am
by Transcend
podo bringing up that slip sounds really towny btw.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:40 am
by Wake1
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:40 am
by podoboq
Actually better yet, real confirmation that Wake is telling the truth:
Post numbers are sorted chronologically. Post 0 in this game is 8019556, but the post that Wake's link directs to is 671742, which has to be far before the mafia PT was created.
Sorry Wake.
I'm gonna go be sad in a corner somewhere.
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:42 am
by Transcend
don't be embarrassed. you were smart to confront him, as opposed to just voting him with that reason in mind.