Page 43 of 110
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:50 am
by JarJarDrinks
And really it's more of: I don't think you're trying to get scum lynched.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:51 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 1048, Manuel87 wrote:Because if i understand you correct you think my reads are scummy so please explain to me why you think so.
I don't necessarily think your reads are scummy. It's just that playstyle isn't enough for me to put you above null. If I felt like you were pushing a scum lynch, I'd give u town points for it.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:53 am
by JarJarDrinks
I will reread Naomi cause I may have been a little lazy rereading her ISO since she's been a top townread for so long.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:16 am
by Naomi-Tan
In post 1048, Manuel87 wrote: In post 1046, JarJarDrinks wrote: In post 1024, Manuel87 wrote:Even if most people townread her you should explain that read.Or are you saying you townread her because most ppl townread her?
Just saying that most people are probably seeing what I'm seeing but since ur scumreading her, I'll expound:
Naomi is playing a way where she doesn't care about how her posts look. Something is on her mind and she just spews it out. There's just no carefulness that you almost always see from scumposts.
Not sure who this was directed at; Im just going with how I feel and right now I just feel a little lost I want to push the people I have issues with but I'm uncertain if there scum and I feel that If I push them and it spirals into a 1v1 of a greater intensity than I have already done then tomorrow scum will easily push for my defeat. I also feel this could be the case if RB or Infinity flips scum as I felt consistently that they are both town and that flip will make it look like I was in a team with the other (and as the final of my called trio would be harder to lynch I feel scum would put me to the block second leading town) I think I need to read over the game again today or tomorow (though likely monday as Im more busy today) As I feel that its best that I reafirm my reads again and refresh myself reading through and trying to be unbiest so I can get a more clear read. but for now.. I just feel kinda lost..
In this post she is caring a lot about looking scummy
In post 1046, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 1024, Manuel87 wrote:You say i am scumhunting and interacting so what more do you need? You dont have to agree with my reads i change my reads because of arguments not because some people think differently.
You have a way worse read on rb/FA yet he is a townlean read and i am null? I would like an explanation because i read your argument as "he is town but his reads are bad so he is null".
What more do I need for what? I have you as null.
But who a person reads is certainly alignment indicitive so if you were acting how you were AND had reads that matched mine, I'd probably townread you for it.
[/quote]
So you think scum would not have their scummbuddys in their readlist?
Since i am pretty sure you dont actually mean that you have to explain to me why you would think i am scummy because of my reads.
Because if i understand you correct you think my reads are scummy so please explain to me why you think so.[/quote]
How can you NOT know who it was directed at, he literally quoted you, you literally quoted him quoting you? like this just baffles me, how do you not see him quoting you? what the hell is this even I don't!? This is so very baffling that I stopped mid reading to make this comment like wtf.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:17 am
by Naomi-Tan
Ah I see what happened here as I started to read the quote was broken. I was literally speechless!
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:20 am
by JarJarDrinks
I reread and still townread Naomi.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:25 am
by Naomi-Tan
Yeah this is pretty much how I felt about manuel, when I did my reread I went in thinking I may have gotten it wrong but post read I'm pretty sure there scum.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:27 am
by Infinity 324
@jarjar: wrt LQ, I guess we just weight the interactions with rb differently? Cause I have LQ as strong town after that. It doesn't make sense not to back down or try and appease someone that's trying to policy lynch you, as scum. Note that LQ maintained that rb was in the wrong there, that's just a really bad idea for scum in his position.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:29 am
by kraska77
So you do recognise that rb was just being egotistical and pushing for a policy lynch?
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:32 am
by Infinity 324
Well rb wasn't really consistent, that's the main reason I think he's scum tbh. In some of his posts, he claimed to be convinced LQ was scum, others implied he wasn't sure and just wanted to lynch LQ anyway.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:36 am
by Naomi-Tan
I'd disagree I think he let his emotions get the better of him and just went bearesk on LQ like if you read both there interactions you can see him getting more and more angry and eventually (though he would disagree Im sure) he just blew a fuse and justified in his own mind that he was scum and tried to justify it to everyone else when that failed he admited to himself and us that he didn't care about alignment he just wanted him gone.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:38 am
by Infinity 324
But then he went back to saying he was sure LQ was scum. Not something I can see from town, even if they got very emotional.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:39 am
by Infinity 324
If he was actually town and went back and forth, he would've stated his change in opinion. Not maintain that he had the same opinion all along even though his posts implied otherwise.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:45 am
by Naomi-Tan
Eh I think he was just saying anything to get him lynched at that stage, I don't think we can use the LQ interactions to tell anything other than LQ is probably town.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:53 am
by Infinity 324
I agree with that at least, I suppose we'll have to look at fire as well but I have a hard time seeing rb's actions from a town perspective, even very emotional town.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:04 am
by Manuel87
So it took you 27 minutes to reread 158 posts and you still had sparetime to think about what you were reading afterwards?
I have to say i cant believe that you actually read the posts looking for something but rather just skimmed over it.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:08 am
by LicketyQuickety
In post 1057, Infinity 324 wrote:@jarjar: wrt LQ, I guess we just weight the interactions with rb differently? Cause I have LQ as strong town after that. It doesn't make sense not to back down or try and appease someone that's trying to policy lynch you, as scum. Note that LQ maintained that rb was in the wrong there, that's just a really bad idea for scum in his position.
I felt rb wasn't attacking the right things, I had no reason to back down.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:08 am
by Infinity 324
I agree with you, as scum however I would've expected you to back down to save your skin.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:28 am
by Killthestory
i'm gonna lurk more, but i might do something later today (gamewise) or tomorrow.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:36 am
by LicketyQuickety
Hiplop and Assassin:
Why are you Town?
I can see myself changing my stance on both of you giving some good content, in which case I would be replacing my current Scum reads of you both with others. Prolly KTS and possibly kraska77 or MariaR
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:36 am
by Naomi-Tan
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:48 am
by Killthestory
thats my motto.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:51 am
by JarJarDrinks
@KTS
why are u voting for LQ?
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:51 am
by Killthestory
i am?
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:52 am
by JarJarDrinks
yes