Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 5:50 am
I still think they are town... which is why im not going L-1.. Jeez.. Can everyone on the XYZZY train write when they think there scum in a block to try and convince me ? I'd like to know full reasoning..
Page 43 of 116
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:24 am
Jeezus, Naomi, you start out the game telling us that how you play is not indicative of you being scum or town, and then town read xyzzy because their gameplay is similar to yours. We realize you are doing this and that it's a huge towntell on your part, but seriously, follow your own advice.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:26 am
I town read them because I can follow there thought pattern and don't really understand why XYZZY's train is a good one.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:36 am
I just went back and started reading 510 (I did make it a LITTLE further) and I can't imagine that that is true, because 510 is about six posts of xyzzy's that you understand and then a ton you either don't understand or straight-up disagree with. You want to point me to where you starting following their thought pattern?In post 1052, Naomi-Tan wrote:I town read them because I can follow there thought pattern and don't really understand why XYZZY's train is a good one.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:04 am
The top half of 510 and the follow up big post sorted out a bunch of my original issues.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:36 am
like by the end of 510 I felt that they was town enough to not have them as my biggest scum read, then after the next post I was happy :3In post 1053, massive wrote:I just went back and started reading 510 (I did make it a LITTLE further) and I can't imagine that that is true, because 510 is about six posts of xyzzy's that you understand and then a ton you either don't understand or straight-up disagree with. You want to point me to where you starting following their thought pattern?In post 1052, Naomi-Tan wrote:I town read them because I can follow there thought pattern and don't really understand why XYZZY's train is a good one.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:18 am
We had this game pretty much locked, but then everybody went like:
"Let's lynch X!"
"Nah, X is town! Let's lynch Y!"
"Y is town! And so is X! Let's lynch Z!"
"Wow you're so bad!"
"Let's lynch X!"
"Nah, X is town! Let's lynch Y!"
"Y is town! And so is X! Let's lynch Z!"
"Wow you're so bad!"
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:21 am
Is there any way we can agree on a lynch?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:26 am
xyzzy was last online today morning, isn't this enough to be a scumclaim?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:28 am
We can lynch Seraphim.
Stop being so hyper to lynch town.
Stop being so hyper to lynch town.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:32 am
I thought about forcing both to claim.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:46 am
I'd vote xxyzy over Seraphom but I don't have a strong opinion either way. We just need to lynch someone.
I do think there is value in claiming though.
I do think there is value in claiming though.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:47 am
I mean someone is at L-1 and we're waiting for a claim, so yeah.In post 1057, Creature wrote:Is there any way we can agree on a lynch?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:01 am
These last posts are eww by Skelda. If I wasn't convinced BlackStar was scum, these would be setting up red flags that you are Seraphim's partner.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:14 am
I think x being at L-1 is a sign that we're mostly in agreementIn post 1057, Creature wrote:Is there any way we can agree on a lynch?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:16 am
Yeah, no. It's a sign that the wagon stalled. Sera was at or near L minus 1 too but yet no one has given a reason for X being scum while I tied Seraphim to Light. X is a pretty clear counter.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:20 am
I gave like 5 different reasons for why x is scummy, so stop making things up.In post 1065, Blitzkrieg wrote:Yeah, no. It's a sign that the wagon stalled. Sera was at or near L minus 1 too but yet no one has given a reason for X being scum while I tied Seraphim to Light. X is a pretty clear counter.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:21 am
I hate to be that guy but just hammer her lol
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:22 am
Great. Show me where.In post 1066, BlackStar wrote:I gave like 5 different reasons for why x is scummy, so stop making things up.In post 1065, Blitzkrieg wrote:Yeah, no. It's a sign that the wagon stalled. Sera was at or near L minus 1 too but yet no one has given a reason for X being scum while I tied Seraphim to Light. X is a pretty clear counter.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:23 am
I'm a townie, so I suppose standard "at worst we lose a townie" apply here.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:24 am
So should we hammer or force Seraphim to claim too?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:24 am
Look at part 3In post 1019, BlackStar wrote:In post 1001, Blitzkrieg wrote:1) TowncredIn post 967, BlackStar wrote:Blitz, reply to this pleaseIn post 933, BlackStar wrote:What would be the motivation for a scum vig to shoot his scum buddy that was at L-1? It would make much more sense to just vote on the wagon or tell him to claim a pr or something. Wagon form and fall apart quickly on day 1, so it was likely that if I hadn't shot light then he wouldn't have even gotten lynched. No matter how often you say it, Verith is not "obv town". He's null at best and that's being a little generous. Why do you even townread xyzzy? I'm not voting sera right now because you've been illogical throughout the game so far and I don't want to follow someone like that. Yeah, jord was scummy. But sera has been decent. I don't know what to make of him so far. But xyzzy's posts are really awkward and light had them as high up on his reads list without saying why. I think it's better to go after xyzzyyou'd still get towncred from being on the wagon. Why would you waste a big shot instead of voting? Also, it's effing impossible to have a scum day vig in a normal game!
2) Vedith is obvious town. Sorry. No matter how much shade you both throw, he has conflict with all scum so...youre the only one who sees him as obv town, so he's clearly not obv town
3) Because you're pushing him, he's solving the game and you two are desperately deflecting onto anyone scumhunting that is not you. You're attempting to have me prove everyone else town to avoid your terrible association with Light. Then, you just pick the weakest town case and argue it's not enough. Not playing that game.hes not solving the game, almost all of his posts are worded awkwardly, light had him high on his reads list and never said why, he barely posts and he started sheeping you as soon as the wagon on him formed. It's extremely likely that he's scum. I don't have an association with light and you need to stop don't biasing.
4) Here's the mysterious "illogical" insult rather that responding to the case on Sera. The fact I believe you are scum is not a tenet in my case on Sera. You saw they slipped and voted ten. Now that there's another wagon, suddenly I am illogical.its not mysterious or sudden. You've been illogical ever since the vig shot. The normal reaction to someone shooting scum isn't "you must be scum too!" And it's not logical to become 100% convinced of a bs read like this even though it goes against the guidelines of a normal game. You really need to take a step back and look at what you've been doing.
5) It's not better to go after town while you insult me for going after scum. It's the only move you have left as I am not Looney tunes sounding if scum can have a dayvig.you're going after town
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:24 am
oh just realized i wasn't voting
VOTE: xyzzy
hammer'd
have a good night err1.
VOTE: xyzzy
hammer'd
have a good night err1.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:25 am
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:26 am
uh, yeah you were? you haven't included since this post, and the most recent vote count has you voting me.In post 886, Transcend wrote:V is probably town too. I'd explain why but i think it brands the rules.
VOTE: xyzzy