Mafiascum.net

Hello everyone and shit I have three days to catch up and do something. Reading thru thread rn, if anyone has a brief summary I'd appreciate it.

I've briefly skimmed thru the first couple o pages and I think my "Toxic Player Detector" just got fired up, loads of toxic and insults and cancer and stuff going at each other between LAX (god it's a hydra of a reasonably good player and a player with unholy levels of unreadable post) and James3.
The last time I played in a game where there was such a thing happening a confbiased a lot so if you see me confbiasing please stop me

In post 1050, XnadrojX wrote:Hello everyone and shit I have three days to catch up and do something. Reading thru thread rn, if anyone has a brief summary I'd appreciate it.

You didn't miss anything, just a bunch of people screaming for lynches over superficial bs (us included).

Can I get tl;dr?

In post 784, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 783, D3f3nd3r wrote:Nero is getting his Role PM literally now.

yeah, I had waited to post.

I'm not reading two other games to learn about the mechanics here so otherwise I'll just scumhunt like normal.

Mostly, your stuff happens the next night instead of the night you submit it.

In post 841, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 837, Land of Xanth wrote:Maybe I could forgive you for doing the international mefia synbol.

and whats wrong with a good facepalm? is actually my favorite smiley and is how I feel about most everything posted on this site and most players. I have some really good off site smiles but I have to C+P from photobucket and that takes effort .

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2529
Post them into this thread then you can just link to that image URL. Makes them easier to find for you and allows others to use them.

In post 854, Land of Xanth wrote:

In post 1, D3f3nd3r wrote:A. Actions will, by default, not be resolved until the next Night phase due to the Timeshift.

In the first game, I died night1. In the second game, there was no night1 kill.

In post 857, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Also can someone explain the case on Prep bc I look at his ISO and didn't see anything particular scummy. Maybe I missed something but I don't see him as scum.

You were going to look at the Skelda case. Update on that?

In post 890, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 889, SlySly wrote:Does anyone ever really double check?

I checked because I was so affronted by his strategy but usually I just ignore secondhand meta and go with what I've seen myself.

My issue with James is that when the game started he claimed, then was all gung-ho when his claim was doubted, and said he claimed to because he always does when town, and I ask him if he fake-claimed as scum, and he said yes, then kind of vanished.

His scumhunting has been limited to anyone doubting him, and his claim is kind of the only reason he is still alive.

In post 974, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 972, Vifam wrote:wait for the tl;dr imo

I'm not one to lurk and I don't need to be spoon fed but I still need someone to explain the Ram case.

From what I gather, Ram thinks Sly softed a PR.

I don't read it that way, but I like big fat juicy obvious crumbs in my cereal.

In post 982, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Not quite biting on a Pep lynch. I need to be convinced more for my vote to flip that way

You were going to review the case on Pep.

Then the case on Skelda.

Would like to hear the summary of your reviews, and how you reached the conclusion of "not quite biting on a Pep lynch."

In post 1059, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 974, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 972, Vifam wrote:wait for the tl;dr imo

I'm not one to lurk and I don't need to be spoon fed but I still need someone to explain the Ram case.

From what I gather, Ram thinks Sly softed a PR.

I don't read it that way, but I like big fat juicy obvious crumbs in my cereal.

nah, i misread in rush, when was catching up, it was sarcasm from Sly

Also, would like to hear your reasons to vote Pep

In post 1017, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1012, James3 wrote:I can't say for a certain fact that he's town, but he's definitely not mafia.

if he's not mafia how is he not town?

That's an interesting conundrum. I'll leave you to figure it out.

In post 1050, XnadrojX wrote:Hello everyone and shit I have three days to catch up and do something. Reading thru thread rn, if anyone has a brief summary I'd appreciate it.

Who are your scumbuddies?

In post 1058, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 890, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 889, SlySly wrote:Does anyone ever really double check?

I checked because I was so affronted by his strategy but usually I just ignore secondhand meta and go with what I've seen myself.

My issue with James is that when the game started he claimed, then was all gung-ho when his claim was doubted, and said he claimed to because he always does when town, and I ask him if he fake-claimed as scum, and he said yes, then kind of vanished.

His scumhunting has been limited to anyone doubting him, and his claim is kind of the only reason he is still alive.

Query, are you not reading the thread, or are you a liar?

In post 1028, Firebringer wrote:Fucking hell, this role is the worst.

Whats up folks.
I do not plan to read anything.

What flavor of scum are you?

Firebringer isn't scum (probably anyway). He's just bad at making decisions in general.

In post 1062, Ramcius wrote:Also, would like to hear your reasons to vote Pep

He may be scum.

In post 1063, James3 wrote:Query, are you not reading the thread, or are you a liar?

Prove me wrong.

In post 1065, James3 wrote:Firebringer isn't scum (probably anyway). He's just bad at making decisions in general.

Dude.......

In post 1066, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 1062, Ramcius wrote:Also, would like to hear your reasons to vote Pep

He may be scum.

what makes you think so? Cause at this point anyone can be scum

In post 1007, havingfitz wrote:

In post 1005, Tywin Lannister wrote:It's an obv scum train.

So Pep is for sure town? Why?

In post 1005, Tywin Lannister wrote:If pep flips town

Ok...so there's a chaaaaance he would flip scum? I feel better.

In post 1005, Tywin Lannister wrote:, there's at least 1 scum on that wagon.

So 9 to lynch...and there'll be at least 1 scum on the wagon? Brilliant analysis (regardless of flip I'd say).

In post 1005, Tywin Lannister wrote:It's so obvious that it makes me suspicious of the players who DID give a case, yet haven't grilled any of the players sheeping them.

I'm sheeping LoX and Kyouto because they're my strongest town reads and the Pep wagon has/had traction.

This entire post from HavingFitz is shit. He asks rhetorical questions, makes smartass remarks, and tries to discredit me for calling him out on him not giving a reason for voting Pep. He still hasn't, and he avoided the question/accusation entirely.

HavingFitz: You TRing ssbm and LoX does not = a SR on pep. They are not mutually exclusive. You just admitting to not be SRing pep and only voting him because your two TRs are.

If you don't SR pep, why are you voting him? Not SRing him means you TR him, so you're voting a TR.

If you do SR pep, give your reasons for it. Simple stuff here.

If you are town, you should have no problems with either question. Try actually answering them for once. Also, you are not playing the same as your town meta whatsoever. Why?

In post 1067, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 1063, James3 wrote:Query, are you not reading the thread, or are you a liar?

Prove me wrong.

VI read on this one

In post 1069, Ramcius wrote:

In post 1066, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 1062, Ramcius wrote:Also, would like to hear your reasons to vote Pep

He may be scum.

what makes you think so? Cause at this point anyone can be scum

Gut.

In post 1071, James3 wrote:

In post 1067, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 1063, James3 wrote:Query, are you not reading the thread, or are you a liar?

Prove me wrong.

VI read on this one

Yes, I am a village idiot.

no, just a lurk sack at times.